journal article·2017-06

Angle-dependent X-ray magnetic circular dichroism study of enhanced perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in hybrid [CoO/Pd]2[Co/Pd]7 multilayers

D.H. Kim, Eunsook Lee, Hyun Woo Kim, Seungho Seong, Seung-Mo Yang, Hae-Soo Park, JinPyo Hong, Younghak Kim, J.-Y. Kim, J.-S. Kang

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract We have investigated the angle-dependent orbital and spin magnetic moments of the [Co/Pd] multilayer (ML) films with intervening CoO layers under annealing by employing angle-dependent soft X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD). After annealing, the orbital magnetic moments of Co ions are found to be enhanced, with the maximum values along the perpendicular direction of [Co/Pd] ML, providing evidence for the origin of the improved perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA) being the interface spin–orbit coupling. The induced Pd polarization was observed after annealing, demonstrating the strong Co-Pd hybridization arising from the Co-Pd alloy formation near the interface. The angle-dependent coercivity follows the 1 / cos θ behavior, suggesting that the magnetization reversal in the hysteresis curve in [Co/Pd] ML occurs mainly through the pinning mechanism.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Magnetism in coordination complexes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Wolf · Science · 2001 · 294 · 148810.1126/science.1065389 ↗
2. Mangin · Nature Mater. · 2006 · 5 · 21010.1038/nmat1595 ↗
3. Meng · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 17250610.1063/1.2198797 ↗
4. Bandiera · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 07241010.1063/1.4745924 ↗
5. Yakushiji · Appl. Phys. Express · 2015 · 8 · 08300310.7567/APEX.8.083003 ↗
6. Carcia · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1985 · 17 · 17810.1063/1.96254 ↗
7. Draaisma · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1987 · 66 · 35110.1016/0304-8853(87)90169-7 ↗
8. den Broeder · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1988 · 60 · 276910.1103/PhysRevLett.60.2769 ↗
9. Shin · J. Appl. Phys. · 1990 · 67 · 31710.1063/1.345255 ↗
10. Stinson · J. Appl. Phys. · 1990 · 67 · 445910.1063/1.344904 ↗
11. Kim · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1997 · 170 · L710.1016/S0304-8853(97)00060-7 ↗
12. Greidanus · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1989 · 54 · 248110.1063/1.101073 ↗
13. Hashimoto · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1990 · 56 · 106910.1063/1.102568 ↗
14. Zeper · J. Appl. Phys. · 1989 · 65 · 497110.1063/1.343189 ↗
15. Shinjo · Surf. Sci. Rep · 1991 · 12 · 4910.1016/0167-5729(91)90010-U ↗
16. Gay · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1986 · 56 · 272810.1103/PhysRevLett.56.2728 ↗
17. Wang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1993 · 70 · 86910.1103/PhysRevLett.70.869 ↗
18. Daalderop · Phys. Rev. B · 1990 · 42 · 727010.1103/PhysRevB.42.7270 ↗
19. Néel · J. Phys. Radium · 1954 · 15 · 22510.1051/jphysrad:01954001504022500 ↗
20. Lee · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 104 · 02240410.1063/1.4861840 ↗
21. de Groot · Phys. Rev. B · 1990 · 42 · 545910.1103/PhysRevB.42.5459 ↗
22. van der Laan · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 1992 · 4 · 4189
23. Thole · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1992 · 68 · 194310.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1943 ↗
24. Chen · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1995 · 75 · 15210.1103/PhysRevLett.75.152 ↗
25. J.B. Kortright
26. Nakajima · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 81 · 522910.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5229 ↗
27. Koide · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 87 · 25720110.1103/PhysRevLett.87.257201 ↗
28. Kotsugi · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2013 · 326 · 23510.1016/j.jmmm.2012.09.008 ↗
29. Weller · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1995 · 75 · 375210.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3752 ↗
30. Kuch · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 62 · 382410.1103/PhysRevB.62.3824 ↗
31. Sawada · J. Electron. Spec. Relat. Phenom. · 2011 · 184 · 28010.1016/j.elspec.2010.12.021 ↗
32. Bailey · Phys. Rev. B · 2012 · 86 · 14440310.1103/PhysRevB.86.144403 ↗
33. Figueroa · Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 90 · 17442110.1103/PhysRevB.90.174421 ↗
34. Okabayashi · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2014 · 105 · 12240810.1063/1.4896290 ↗
35. Saravanan · RSC Adv. · 2015 · 5 · 1901410.1039/C4RA15683H ↗
36. Yang · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1716910.1038/srep17169 ↗
37. Vivas · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2016 · 400 · 24810.1016/j.jmmm.2015.07.021 ↗
38. Vivas · Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 93 · 17441010.1103/PhysRevB.93.174410 ↗
39. Regan · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 64 · 21442210.1103/PhysRevB.64.214422 ↗
40. Kang · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 19512210.1103/PhysRevB.76.195122 ↗
41. Kim · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 96 · 04720510.1103/PhysRevLett.96.047205 ↗
42. Oguchi · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 70 · 02441210.1103/PhysRevB.70.024412 ↗
43. Meng · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 03390410.1063/1.3611426 ↗
44. θ=22.5° corresponds to the normal incidence of the synchrotron radiation (see Fig. 3amcd(a)), and so the XAS signals might be the largest around θ∼20°±10°.
45. Goering · J. Appl. Phys. · 2000 · 88 · 592010.1063/1.1308095 ↗
46. Kronmüller · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1988 · 74 · 29110.1016/0304-8853(88)90202-8 ↗
47. Givord · J. de Physique IV Colloque · 1992 · 02 · C3
48. In the XMCD data obtained parallel to the surface (θ∼90°), there might be an artifact in the measured XMCD signals due to the tendency of the ejected electrons to fall back onto the sample surface under the applied field.