journal article·2008-11

CPP-GMR heads with a current screen layer for high areal density

H. Katada, K. Nakamoto, H. Hoshiya, K. Hoshino, N. Yoshida, M. Shiimoto, Y. Sato, H. Takazawa, K. Yasui, M. Hatatani, K. Watanabe, Y. Ikeda, K. Meguro

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract We investigated the potential for high-areal-density recording in current-perpendicular-to-plane giant magnetoresistive (CPP-GMR) heads with a current screen layer. The current screen layer is a nano-oxide layer with confined current paths. We fabricated the current screen CPP-GMR heads with a narrow sensor width of 40–50 nm, a high MR ratio of 17%, and low-resistance-area (RA) product of 0.2 Ω μm 2 . The fabricated heads showed a sufficiently high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 30–40 dB. No extra noise, such as spin-torque noise, was observed. Linear density of 1360 kFCI from the head with the magnetic read width of 45 nm was obtained. Distribution of sensor resistance due to nano-hole area distribution in the current screen layer can be reduced with low-RA film. Spin-torque noise can be suppressed by reducing the current-induced field and controlling the shape anisotropy. Accordingly, the current screen CPP-GMR head is a promising candidate that has the potential for high-areal-density recording.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Fujiwara · Trans. Magn. Soc. Jpn. · 2003 · 3 · 9510.3379/tmjpn2001.3.95 ↗
2. Tanaka · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2004 · 40 · 20310.1109/TMAG.2003.821199 ↗
3. Fukuzawa · IEEE. Trans. Magn. · 2002 · 40 · 223610.1109/TMAG.2004.829185 ↗
4. Hoshino · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2005 · 41 · 292610.1109/TMAG.2005.855313 ↗
5. CPP-GMR heads with a current screen layer for 300Gb/in2 recording10.1109/TMAG.2007.911022 ↗
6. Slonczewski · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1996 · 159 · L110.1016/0304-8853(96)00062-5 ↗
7. Smith · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 78 · 144810.1063/1.1352694 ↗
8. Klaassen · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2005 · 41 · 230710.1109/TMAG.2005.850289 ↗
9. M. Covington, M. AlHajDarwish, Y. Ding, N.J. Gokemeijer, M.A. Seigler, Phys. Rev. B. 69 (2004) 184406-1.10.1103/PhysRevB.69.184406 ↗
10. Zhu · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2004 · 40 · 18210.1109/TMAG.2003.821202 ↗
11. Zhu · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2004 · 40 · 232310.1109/TMAG.2004.829257 ↗
12. Smith · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2005 · 41 · 293510.1109/TMAG.2005.855314 ↗
13. Smith · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2006 · 42 · 11410.1109/TMAG.2005.861783 ↗
14. Katada · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2006 · 42 · 245010.1109/TMAG.2006.878669 ↗
15. Katada · J. Magn. Soc. Jpn. · 2007 · 31 · 3110.3379/jmsjmag.31.31 ↗