Characterization of magnetic phases in the FexMn0.65−xAl0.35 disordered alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Melted alloys of the Fe x Mn 0.65− x Al 0.35 disordered system, 0.25⩽ x ⩽0.65, were experimentally studied by Mossbauer spectrometry, vibrating sample magnetometry and AC magnetic susceptibility. All the alloys exhibit the BCC structure with a nearly constant lattice parameter (2.92 A). Mossbauer studies at room temperature (RT) show that in the 0.25 ⩽ x ⩽0.45 range the alloys are paramagnetic (P) while in the 0.50⩽ x ⩽0.65 range, they are ferromagnetic. At 77 K, Mossbauer studies show that the alloy with x = 0.25 presents weak magnetic character that is consistent with an antiferromagnetic (AF) behavior due to the high Mn content, while those with 0.30⩽ x ⩽0.40 are paramagnetic, and those in the 0.45⩽ x ⩽0.65 range are ferromagnetic (F) with a mean field increasing with the Fe content. Hysteresis cycles at RT prove the paramagnetic character of the alloys between x = 0.25 and 0.40 and the ferromagnetic character for x ⩾ 0.45 . Complementary measurements using AC magnetic susceptibility permit a magnetic phase diagram to be proposed, with the P phase for high temperature and all the compositions, the AF phase for low Fe content and at low temperature, the F phase for high Fe content above RT and the spin glass phase for all the compositions and at temperatures lower than 46 K. In addition, the mean field renormalization group (MFRG) method, applied to a random competitive and site dilute Ising model with nearest-neighbor, gives rise to magnetic phase diagram, which fairly agrees with previous experimental one.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Theoretical and Computational Physics · Magnetic properties of thin films · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Kayak · Met. Sci. Heat Treatment · 1969 · 2 · 9510.1007/BF00652271 ↗
2. Banerji · Met. Prog. · 1978 · April · 59
3. Bilmes · Rev. Metal. Madrid · 1994 · 30 · 298
4. Pérez Alcázar · Phys. Rev. B · 1988 · 38 · 281610.1103/PhysRevB.38.2816 ↗
5. Chakrabarti · Met. Trans. · 1977 · 8B · 12110.1007/BF02656360 ↗
6. Mohan Babu · Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) · 1996 · 193 · 16710.1002/pssb.2221930119 ↗
7. Rosales Rivera · Phys. Rev. B · 1990 · 41 · 477410.1103/PhysRevB.41.4774 ↗
8. Kobeissi · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 1991 · 3 · 498310.1088/0953-8984/3/26/018 ↗
9. Zamora · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1994 · 137 · 33910.1016/0304-8853(94)90720-X ↗
10. Zamora · J. Appl. Phys. · 1997 · 82 · 616510.1063/1.366500 ↗
11. Bremers · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1995 · 140 · 6310.1016/0304-8853(94)01133-8 ↗
12. Zamora · J. Phys. Condens. Matter. · 2000 · 12 · 61110.1088/0953-8984/12/5/309 ↗
13. González · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2002 · 14 · 653110.1088/0953-8984/14/25/320 ↗
14. Stinchombe · 1982 · vol. 8
15. Belander · Braz. J. Phys. · 2000 · 30 · 682
16. Wolf · Braz. J. Phys. · 2000 · 30 · 79410.1590/S0103-97332000000400030 ↗
17. Pelissetto · Phys. Rep. · 2002 · 368 · 54910.1016/S0370-1573(02)00219-3 ↗
18. Droz · Phys. Lett. · 1982 · 92A · 28710.1016/0375-9601(82)90089-5 ↗
19. Lyra · Physica A · 1989 · 155 · 23210.1016/0378-4371(89)90094-0 ↗
20. Plascak · Braz. J. Phys. · 1999 · 29 · 51910.1590/S0103-97331999000300025 ↗
21. Zamora · Phys. Rev. B. · 1995 · 51 · 932910.1103/PhysRevB.51.9329 ↗
22. Plascak · Phys. Rev. · 2000 · 61 · 318810.1103/PhysRevB.61.3188 ↗
23. Rosales Rivera · Phys. Rev. B · 1990 · 41 · 477410.1103/PhysRevB.41.4774 ↗
24. González · Hyp. Int. · 2002 · 141/142 · 41510.1023/A:1021256926343 ↗
25. F. Varret, J. Teillet, Unpublished MOSFIT Program.
26. Pérez Alcázar · Phys. Rev. B · 1986 · 34 · 194010.1103/PhysRevB.34.1940 ↗