Influence of the electrical resistivity of a ferromagnetic thin film on its permeability measurement performed with a permeameter
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Complex permeability μ (= μ ′− j ⋅ μ ″) of a Permalloy Ni 80 Fe 20 thin film, deposited on a 0.5 mm thick glass substrate, is investigated in the frequency range from 0.15 to 6 GHz using a single-coil method. The results reveal that the frequency-dependent permeability is affected by the way to determine the RLC parameters, describing the cell, which allow extending this broad band technique up to 6 GHz. We show that the interaction between the electric field E , of the TEM mode propagated by the coil, and the electrical resistivity of the ferromagnetic layer can be taken into account experimentally. In this case, the RLC parameters are determined from a preliminary impedance measurement of the cell loaded with the ferromagnetic thin film along its easy axis. Our results are compared with a theoretical spectral permeability assuming a gyroresonance mechanism and an in-plane uniaxial anisotropy in the Permalloy thin film. A very good agreement is obtained with the experimental results and leads to the determination of a constant K that describes the permeameter. Then, permeability measurements are first performed on a ferrimagnetic composite made of Ni 0.5 Zn 0.5 Fe 2 O 4 spinel ferrite embedding in a non-magnetic matrix. For a 650 μm thick sample, we point out that the single-coil method is well adapted to measure the high-frequency permeability up to 6 GHz of ferrite composite materials without involving long computations and precise clearances for the samples.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic properties of thin films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Queffelec · IEEE Trans. Magn · 1994 · 30 · 22410.1109/20.312262 ↗
2. Fessant · IEEE Trans. Magn · 1993 · 29 · 8210.1109/20.195551 ↗
3. Acher · J. Magn. Magn. Mater · 1994 · 136 · 26910.1016/0304-8853(94)00323-8 ↗
4. J.C. Peuzin, J.C. Gay, in: JCMM Conference Proceedings, Limoges, 1991, p. 75.
5. Pain · J. Appl. Phys · 1999 · 85 · 515110.1063/1.369107 ↗
6. P.M. Jacquart, L. Roux, J.Y. Godebout, J.C. Servol, A. Chevalier, in: JCMM Conference Proceedings, Paris, 2000, p. 91.
7. Grimes · IEEE Trans. Magn · 1995 · 31 · 410910.1109/20.489877 ↗
8. Acher · IEEE Trans. Magn · 1994 · 30 · 453310.1109/20.334139 ↗
9. P.F. Combes, in: Micro-ondes: Lignes, Guides et Cavités, Vol. 1, Dunod, Paris, 1996, pp. 139–140.
10. Moraitakis · J. Magn. Magn. Mater · 2000 · 222 · 16810.1016/S0304-8853(00)00560-6 ↗
11. Moulder · IEEE Trans. Magn · 1998 · 34 · 50510.1109/20.661482 ↗
12. E.O. Hammerstad, in: European Microwave Conference Proceedings, 1975, p. 268.
13. van de Riet · J. Appl. Phys · 1997 · 81 · 35010.1063/1.364118 ↗
14. Rytov · Sov. Phys. JETP · 1956 · 2 · 466
15. Gilbert · Phys. Rev · 1955 · 100 · 1243
16. Ben Youssef · IEEE Trans. Magn · 2002 · 38 · 314110.1109/TMAG.2002.802422 ↗
17. Kasagi · IEEE Trans. Magn · 1999 · 35 · 342410.1109/20.800545 ↗
18. Zhang · J. Magn. Magn. Mater · 2000 · 218 · 6710.1016/S0304-8853(00)00344-9 ↗
19. De Vicente · J. Magn. Magn. Mater · 2002 · 251 · 10010.1016/S0304-8853(02)00484-5 ↗