Investigation of Rayleigh region in strip like amorphous FINEMET samples after different heat treatments
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this paper we have investigated the influence of thermal treatment on magnetization processes in the low magnetic field range (Rayleigh region). For this study, rapidly quenched FINEMET ribbons in the as-prepared amorphous state were used. It has been observed that the various annealing temperature lead to the different behavior of a studied material as a consequence of a relaxation of the quenched-in internal stresses in the investigated samples. However, neither of the effects of the atomic diffusion has been observed after low temperature heat-treatments. Moreover, it was detected that the partial elimination of internal stresses has a reduction effect on total magnetic anisotropy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Theoretical and Computational Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Salach · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2012 · 48 · 149310.1109/TMAG.2011.2172589 ↗
2. Kachniarz · 2016 · 473
3. Rayleigh · Sec. R.S. Philos. Mag. Ser. · 1887 · 5 · 22510.1080/14786448708628000 ↗
4. Coey · 2009 · 260
5. Kachniarz · Acta Phys. Pol. A · 2018 · 133 · 105610.12693/APhysPolA.133.1056 ↗
6. Kachniarz · Acta Phys. Pol. A · 2018 · 133 · 66010.12693/APhysPolA.133.660 ↗
7. Recent advances in systems, control and information technology
8. Kachniarz · J. Electr. Eng. - Slovak · 2015 · 66 · 82
9. A. Wodzynski, M. Suliga, K. Chwastek, International Conference on Diagnostics in Electrical Engineering (Diagnostika) Univ West Bohemia, Fac Elect Engn, Dept Technologies & Measurement, Pilsen, Czech Republic Sep 04–07, 2018 2018 International conference on diagnostics in electrical engineering (diagnostika), 2018.https://doi.org/10.1109/DIAGNOSTIKA.2018.8526030.10.1109/DIAGNOSTIKA.2018.8526030 ↗
10. Starodubtsev · Phys. Metals Metallog. · 2018 · 119 · 72810.1134/S0031918X18080136 ↗
11. Kachniarz · Acta Phys. Pol. A · 2017 · 131 · 124410.12693/APhysPolA.131.1244 ↗
12. Gruszka · Mater. Technol. · 2016 · 50 · 707
13. Tsepelev · AIP Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 04770710.1063/1.4994313 ↗
14. Osinalde · Materials · 2018 · 11 · 227810.3390/ma11112278 ↗
15. Starodubtsev · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2019 · 479 · 1910.1016/j.jmmm.2019.02.018 ↗
16. Coey · 2009 · 257
17. Coey · 2009 · 259
18. Chikazumi · 1997
19. Novák · J. Magn. Magn. Matter · 1982 · 26 · 11810.1016/0304-8853(82)90130-5 ↗
20. Kisdi-Koszo · J. Magn. Magn. Matter · 1990 · 92 · 18110.1016/0304-8853(90)90629-5 ↗
21. Kováč · J. Electr. Eng. · 2015 · 66 · 14210.2478/jee-2015-0022 ↗
22. Novák · Acta Phys. Pol. A · 2017 · 131 · 75310.12693/APhysPolA.131.753 ↗
23. Kováč · J. Alloys Compd. · 2018 · 735 · 159110.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.314 ↗
24. Luborsky · J. Appl. Phys. · 1976 · 47 · 364810.1063/1.323173 ↗
25. Herzer · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1990 · 26 · 139710.1109/20.104389 ↗
26. Potocký · Acta Phys. Slov. · 1979 · 29 · 281
27. Zaichenko · J. ASTM Int. · 2010 · 7 · 210.1520/JAI102479 ↗
28. Hono · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1995 · 87–88 · 16610.1016/0169-4332(94)00513-3 ↗
29. Kneller · 1962
30. Yoshizawa · J. Appl. Phys. · 1988 · 64 · 604410.1063/1.342149 ↗