Shape induced magnetic vortex state in hexagonal ordered cofe nanodot arrays using ultrathin alumina shadow mask
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The magnetization reversal process of hexagonal ordered CoFe nanodot arrays was investigated as a function of nanodot thickness ( t d ) varying from 10 to 30 nm with fixed diameter. For this purpose, ordered CoFe nanodots with a diameter of 80 ± 4 nm were grown by sputtering using ultra-thin alumina mask. The vortex annihilation and the dynamic spin configuration in the ordered CoFe nanodots were analyzed by means of magnetic hysteresis loops in complement with the micromagnetic simulation studies. A highly pinched hysteresis loop observed at 20 nm thickness suggests the occurrence of vortex state in these nanodots. With increase in dot thickness from 10 to 30 nm, the estimated coercivity values tend to increase from 80 to 175 Oe, indicating irreversible change in the nucleation/annihilation field of vortex state. The measured magnetic properties were then corroborated with the change in the shape of the nanodots from disk to hemisphere through micromagnetic simulation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures · Photonic Crystals and Applications · Magnetic properties of thin films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Bromwich · Nanotechnology · 2006 · 17 · 436710.1088/0957-4484/17/17/013 ↗
2. Proenca · J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 09390710.1063/1.4794335 ↗
3. Sellarajan · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 12240110.1063/1.4798330 ↗
4. Kulkarni · J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 17390510.1063/1.4829034 ↗
5. Sellarajan · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2016 · 404 · 19710.1016/j.jmmm.2015.12.010 ↗
6. Li · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 92 · 739710.1063/1.1518765 ↗
7. Guo · Adv. Mat. Res. · 2013 · 710 · 80
8. Prejbeanu · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 734310.1063/1.1456041 ↗
9. Kumar · Sci. Rep. · 2014 · 4 · 410810.1038/srep04108 ↗
10. Hoffmann · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 92 · 546310.1063/1.1510559 ↗
11. Scholz · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2003 · 266 · 15510.1016/S0304-8853(03)00466-9 ↗
12. Chung · Phy. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 02441010.1103/PhysRevB.81.024410 ↗
13. Boardman · J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 10E30510.1063/1.1850073 ↗
14. Kim · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 17250810.1063/1.2802038 ↗
15. Li · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 100 · 07431810.1063/1.2356606 ↗
16. Mejia-Lopez · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 100 · 10431910.1063/1.2364599 ↗
17. Roshchin · EPL · 2009 · 86 · 6700810.1209/0295-5075/86/67008 ↗
18. Ivanov · J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2011 · 266 · 012117
19. Ahmad · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 07A33110.1063/1.3566077 ↗
20. Ahmad · J. Supercond. Novel Magn. · 2011 · 24 · 78510.1007/s10948-010-1016-1 ↗
21. Ahmad · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2015 · 378 · 54610.1016/j.jmmm.2014.11.025 ↗
22. Chao · J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. · 2011 · 266 · 012005
23. Ostman · New J. Phys. · 2014 · 16 · 05300210.1088/1367-2630/16/5/053002 ↗
24. Lei · Chem. Mater. · 2005 · 17 · 58010.1021/cm048609c ↗
25. Lei · Prog. Mater Sci. · 2007 · 52 · 46510.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.07.002 ↗
26. Wu · Small · 2010 · 6 · 69510.1002/smll.200902038 ↗
27. Chowdhury · Bull. Mater. Sci. · 2011 · 34 · 42310.1007/s12034-011-0104-6 ↗
28. Chowdhury · Adv. Sci. Lett. · 2012 · 4 · 25310.1166/asl.2012.2018 ↗
29. Chowdhury · AIP Conf. Proc. · 2012 · 1447 · 35710.1063/1.4710027 ↗
30. M.J. Donahue, D.G. Porter, OOMMF User’s Guide, Version 1.0, Interagency report NISTIR 6376, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 1999.10.6028/NIST.IR.6376 ↗