journal article·2016-06Open access

Comparison between simulation and experimentally observed interactions between two magnetic beads in a fluidic system

Olayinka Oduwole, David Tim Grob, Steve Sheard

Abstract

Abstract Continuous flow separation of magnetic particles within a microfluidic device could lead to improved performance of magnetic bead-based assays but the undesirable formation of bead clusters reduces its efficiency; this efficiency refers to the ability to separate bound magnetic beads from a mixture of particles. Such agglomerates are formed due to magnetic binding forces while hydrodynamic interactions strongly influence the particles' movement. This paper presents a model for interactions between a pair of equal sized super-paramagnetic beads suspended in water within a uniform magnetic field. To the best of our knowledge, we present for the first time a comparison between simulated trajectories and the beads' movement captured on video; the beads were suspended in a stationary fluid placed within a uniform magnetic field. In conclusion, the model is a good approximation for beads interacting with their nearest neighbours and is able to predict the trajectory pattern of these particles in a magnetic bead-based assay. Predicting the magnetically induced interaction of nearby beads will help in determining the density of beads in an assay and in avoiding agglomeration over a fixed time duration.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Magnetism and microfluidics
2. Analysis of particle transport in a magnetophoretic microsystem10.1063/1.2164531 ↗
3. Continuous microfluidic immunomagnetic cell separation10.1063/1.1823015 ↗
4. Development of magnetic device for cell separation10.1016/S0304-8853(98)00559-9 ↗
5. Continuous magnetophoretic separation of blood cells in microdevice format10.1063/1.1803628 ↗
6. Y. Zhou, Y. Wang, Q. Lin, A Microchip for Continuous-Flow, Magnetically controlled Capture and Separation of Microparticles, Colombia University, CFD Research Corporation. 〈http://biomems.me.columbia.edu/research/PDFs/jour/ZhouY09_cMACS.pdf〉 (assessed 25.08.15).
7. Analytical model for the magnetophoretic capture of magnetic microspheres in microfluidic devices10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.11.024 ↗
8. On-chip free-flow magnetophoresis: continuous flow separation of magnetic particles and agglomerates10.1021/ac049183o ↗
9. Magnetophoretic velocities of superparamagnetic particles, agglomerates and complexes10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.02.031 ↗
10. Theoretical comparison of magnetic and hydrodynamic interactions between magnetically tagged particles in microfluidic systems10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.01.076 ↗
11. Aggregation dynamics of particles in a microchannel due to an applied magnetic field10.1007/s10404-012-1053-0 ↗
12. Hydrodynamic interaction between two nearby swimming micromachines10.1007/s004660050275 ↗
13. Happel · 1983
14. Hydrodynamic interaction between spheres coated with deformable thin liquid films10.1006/jcis.2002.8376 ↗
15. Gary · 2007
16. Magnetic separation from superparamagnetic particle suspensions10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.01.034 ↗
17. Simulations of dynamic self-assembly of paramagnetic microspheres in confined microgeometries10.1088/0960-1317/15/12/012 ↗
18. Sizing and phenotyping of cellular vesicles using nanoparticle tracking analysis10.1016/j.nano.2011.04.003 ↗
19. Lindfield · 2012
20. T. Ferreira, W. Rasband, Image J user guide, FIJI 1.46, October 2012.
21. Jackson · 1999