journal article·2011-05Open access

The resonance decay function method in the determination of the pre-factor of the Néel relaxation time of single-domain nanoparticles

P.C. Fannin, C.N. Marin, C. Couper

Abstract

Abstract In its simple form, the relaxation time of the Neel relaxation process of the magnetic moment of single-domain particles is given by τ N =τ 0 N exp( σ ), σ being the ratio of anisotropy energy to thermal energy. The pre-factor, τ 0 N , is normally given a value of 10 −9 s, but values ranging from 10 −8 to 10 −12 s have been reported in literature. Here, by means of the field and frequency dependence of the complex magnetic susceptibility, χ ( ω , H ) =χ ′( ω , H ) −iχ ″( ω , H ), of a magnetic fluid sample, in the MHz–GHz range, in conjunction with the determination of the sample decay function, b ( t ), the pre-factor τ 0 N is determined. b ( t ) is readily obtained through the inverse Fourier transformation relationship, which exists between b ( t ) and χ ″( ω ).
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Magnetic properties of thin films · Theoretical and Computational Physics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Rosensweig · 1985
2. L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshitz, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion, 8 (1935) 153, reprinted in Collected Works of Landau, Pergamon Press, London, No. 18 (1965).
3. Relaxation phenomena in condensed matter
4. Fannin · J. Magn. Magn. Mater · 2010 · 320 · 168210.1016/j.jmmm.2009.03.025 ↗
5. Debye · 1929
6. Brown · Phys. Rev. · 1963 · 130 · 167710.1103/PhysRev.130.1677 ↗
7. Raikher · Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. · 1974 · 67 · 1060
8. Dormann · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1999 · 202 · 25110.1016/S0304-8853(98)00627-1 ↗
9. Dormann · J. Phys. Chem. · 1988 · 21 · 2015
10. Dormann · Adv. Chem. Phys. · 1997 · 98 · 28310.1002/9780470141571.ch4 ↗
11. Dormann · Phys. Rev. B · 1996 · 53 · 1429110.1103/PhysRevB.53.14291 ↗
12. Dormann · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1998 · 187 · L13910.1016/S0304-8853(98)00135-8 ↗
13. Hayashi · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1997 · 171 · 17010.1016/S0304-8853(97)00056-5 ↗
14. Zhang · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 39010.1103/PhysRevLett.77.390 ↗
15. Djurberg · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1997 · 79 · 515410.1103/PhysRevLett.79.5154 ↗
16. Fannin · J. Mol. Liq. · 2004 · 114 · 7910.1016/j.molliq.2004.02.020 ↗
17. Scaife · 1998
18. Fannin · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1988 · 21 · 53310.1088/0022-3727/21/3/025 ↗
19. Fannin · Condens. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 473910.1088/0953-8984/15/27/307 ↗
20. Fannin · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 36 · 122710.1088/0022-3727/36/11/301 ↗
21. Fannin · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1995 · 28 · 200310.1088/0022-3727/28/10/001 ↗
22. Fannin · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2010 · 322 · 242810.1016/j.jmmm.2010.02.051 ↗
23. Fannin · Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 55 · 1442310.1103/PhysRevB.55.14423 ↗
24. Kneller · 1962
25. Bickford · Phys. Rev. · 1950 · 78 · 44910.1103/PhysRev.78.449 ↗
26. Marin · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 34 · 146610.1088/0022-3727/34/10/305 ↗
27. Shtrikman · Phys. Lett. · 1981 · 85A · 457