Effective-field theory on the kinetic spin-3/2 Ising model
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The effective-field theory (EFT) is used to study the dynamical response of the kinetic spin-3/2 Ising model in the presence of a sinusoidal oscillating magnetic field. The effective-field dynamic equations are given for the honeycomb lattices ( Z = 3 ). The dynamic order parameter, the dynamic quadrupole moment are calculated. We have found that the behavior of the system strongly depends on the crystal field interaction D . The dynamic phase boundaries are obtained, and there is no dynamic tricritical point on the dynamic phase transition line. The results are also compared with previous results which obtained from the mean-field theory (MFT) and the effective-field theory (EFT) for the square lattices ( Z = 4 ). Different dynamic phase transition lines show that the thermal fluctuations are a key factor of the dynamic phase transition.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Theoretical and Computational Physics · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Quantum many-body systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Sivardière · Phys. Rev. B · 1972 · 5 · 112610.1103/PhysRevB.5.1126 ↗
2. Krinsky · Phys. Rev. B · 1975 · 11 · 39910.1103/PhysRevB.11.399 ↗
3. Bakchich · Physica A · 1994 · 210 · 41510.1016/0378-4371(94)90089-2 ↗
4. Tahiri · Physica A · 2009 · 388 · 342610.1016/j.physa.2009.05.014 ↗
5. Baran · Physica B · 2013 · 408 · 8810.1016/j.physb.2012.09.043 ↗
6. Kaneyoshi · Phys. Lett. A · 1993 · 177 · 17210.1016/0375-9601(93)90530-D ↗
7. Le Gal · Physica A · 1993 · 195 · 17410.1016/0378-4371(93)90261-2 ↗
8. Jiang · Phys. Status Solidi B · 2000 · 219 · 15710.1002/1521-3951(200005)219:1<157::AID-PSSB157>3.0.CO;2-L ↗
9. Liang · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2003 · 267 · 27510.1016/S0304-8853(03)00269-5 ↗
10. Xing · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2012 · 324 · 364110.1016/j.jmmm.2012.04.038 ↗
11. Bekhechi · Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 56 · 1395410.1103/PhysRevB.56.13954 ↗
12. Xavier · Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · 1157510.1103/PhysRevB.57.11575 ↗
13. Žukovič · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2014 · 354 · 27210.1016/j.jmmm.2013.11.026 ↗
14. Žukovič · Acta Phys. Pol. A · 2014 · 126 · 3610.12693/APhysPolA.126.36 ↗
15. Keskin · Phys. Lett. A · 2006 · 353 · 11610.1016/j.physleta.2005.12.079 ↗
16. Saguia · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 68 · 02040310.1103/PhysRevB.68.020403 ↗
17. Romhanyi · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 18442710.1103/PhysRevB.84.184427 ↗
18. Grandi · Phys. Rev. E · 2004 · 70 · 05610910.1103/PhysRevE.70.056109 ↗
19. Canko · Physica A · 2006 · 363 · 31510.1016/j.physa.2005.08.022 ↗
20. Keskin · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2008 · 320 · 810.1016/j.jmmm.2007.05.005 ↗
21. Keskin · Phys. Lett. A · 2005 · 348 · 910.1016/j.physleta.2005.08.021 ↗
22. Canko · Chin. Phys. B · 2010 · 19 · 08051610.1088/1674-1056/19/8/080516 ↗
23. Keskin · Phys. Rev. E · 2006 · 74 · 01111010.1103/PhysRevE.74.011110 ↗
24. Canko · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2006 · 18 · 6635
25. Keskin · J. Stat. Phys. · 2007 · 127 · 35910.1007/s10955-006-9236-2 ↗
26. Keskin · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2007 · 313 · L110.1016/j.jmmm.2007.01.009 ↗
27. Cengiz · Physica A · 2012 · 391 · 294810.1016/j.physa.2012.01.032 ↗
28. Vatansever · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2013 · 332 · 2810.1016/j.jmmm.2012.11.055 ↗
29. Ertas · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2013 · 348 · 11310.1016/j.jmmm.2013.08.012 ↗
30. Glauber · J. Math. Phys. · 1963 · 4 · 29410.1063/1.1703954 ↗
31. Kaneyoshi · Phys. Rev. B · 1981 · 24 · 48110.1103/PhysRevB.24.481 ↗
32. Kaneyoshi · Physica A · 1992 · 186 · 49510.1016/0378-4371(92)90212-9 ↗