Micromagnetic modeling and analysis of linear array of square nanomagnets
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We perform an analytical and a numerical micromagnetic study of the magnetostatic interactions and switching behavior in a linear array of square permalloy (Ni80Fe20) elements. The angular anisotropy in the magnetostatic energy of the array is expressed in terms of a shape anisotropy K s arising from the square geometry of individual elements, and a “chain” anisotropy K c due to inter-element dipolar interactions. An analytical model of K c is introduced, which agrees closely with numerical results from the OOMMF micromagnetics package, in the limit of small element separation s. For s = 5 nm , the energy due to K c far exceeds that of K s by a factor of about 20. For larger s , the model is refined to account for the magnetostatic interaction between surface poles on neighboring elements. Based on the refined model, the analytical switching field H sw is derived by assuming coherent rotation. It yields a close correspondence with OOMMF for s larger than s 0 = 80 nm , but significantly overestimates the numerical value for s s 0 . This is due to the onset of sequential reversal at s = s 0 brought about by strong dipolar coupling between elements. The critical nucleation and the propagation fields associated with sequential reversal are also investigated as a function of s .
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Chou · Proc. IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1997 · 85 · 652
2. Cowburn · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 83 · 104210.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1042 ↗
3. Ross · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2001 · 31 · 20310.1146/annurev.matsci.31.1.203 ↗
4. Cowburn · Science (Washington DC, US) · 2000 · 287 · 5146610.1126/science.287.5457.1466 ↗
5. Chou · J. Appl. Phys. · 1996 · 79 · 610110.1063/1.362440 ↗
6. Suess · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2001 · 37 · 196010.1109/20.951021 ↗
7. Cowburn · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1998 · 81 · 541410.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5414 ↗
8. Cowburn · Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 58 · 921710.1103/PhysRevB.58.9217 ↗
9. M. Donahue, D. Porter, version 1.2a3, see http://math.nist.gov/oommf/.
10. Schabes · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 1987 · 23 · 388210.1109/TMAG.1987.1065775 ↗
11. Sandler · J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 85 · 508010.1063/1.370096 ↗
12. Schneider · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 311310.1063/1.1410873 ↗
13. Cowburn · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 72 · 204110.1063/1.121258 ↗
14. Novosad · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 06040210.1103/PhysRevB.65.060402 ↗
15. Ishizaka · J. Magn. Magn. Mater · 2000 · 210 · L1510.1016/S0304-8853(99)00608-3 ↗
16. Aharoni · J. Appl. Phys. · 1998 · 83 · 343210.1063/1.367113 ↗
17. Zhu · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2003 · 39 · 274410.1109/TMAG.2003.815586 ↗