How size evaluation of lymph node is protocol dependent in MRI when using ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this study, the volume of susceptibility artifact was evaluated in T1 and T2-weighted spin echo (SE) and gradient echo (GRE) images at various parameters using registration and subtraction methods. In order to state an important misinterpretation problem in lymphography, it was demonstrated that a lymph node size may be enlarged approximately 10 times when a T2*-weighted GRE protocol is used. To overcome this problem a technical consideration using multisequence (GRE and SE) paradigm was suggested to ensure both lymph node detection and metastasis identification in lymphatic system. The paradigm was also extended by post-processing manipulation of the SE images using a registration and subtraction approach for detection of lymphatic lesions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: MRI in cancer diagnosis · Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Harisinghani · N. Engl. J. Med. · 2003 · 348 · 249110.1056/NEJMoa022749 ↗
2. Anzai · Radiology · 1994 · 192 · 70910.1148/radiology.192.3.7520182 ↗
3. Deserno · Radiology · 2004 · 233 · 44910.1148/radiol.2332031111 ↗
4. Rockall · J. Clin. Oncol. · 2005 · 23 · 281310.1200/JCO.2005.07.166 ↗
5. Michel · Radiology · 2002 · 225 · 52710.1148/radiol.2252011605 ↗
6. Weissleder · Radiology · 1989 · 171 · 53510.1148/radiology.171.3.2717761 ↗
7. Sigal · Eur. Radiol. · 2002 · 12 · 110410.1007/s003300101130 ↗
8. Bellin · Curr. Opin. Urol. · 2007 · 17 · 6510.1097/MOU.0b013e32801198a3 ↗
9. Bellin · Radiology · 1998 · 207 · 79910.1148/radiology.207.3.9609907 ↗
10. Vassallo · Radiology · 1994 · 193 · 50110.1148/radiology.193.2.7972768 ↗
11. Weissleder · Radiology · 1990 · 175 · 49410.1148/radiology.175.2.2326475 ↗
12. Kim · Radiology · 1993 · 187 · 73510.1148/radiology.187.3.8497623 ↗
13. Rogers · Magn. Reson. Imaging · 1998 · 8 · 91710.1016/S0730-725X(98)00090-3 ↗
14. Jung · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1999 · 194 · 21010.1016/S0304-8853(98)00578-2 ↗
15. Saksena · Am. J. Roentgenol. · 2006 · 187 · W58210.2214/AJR.05.0873 ↗
16. Tanoura · Am. J. Roentgenol. · 1992 · 159 · 87510.2214/ajr.159.4.1529857 ↗
17. N. Gharehaghaji, M.A. Oghabian, S. Sarkar, et al., J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., in press.
18. Szklaruk · IMAJ · 2007 · 9 · 153
19. Firouznia · Pak. J. Biol. Sci. · 2008 · 11 · 60710.3923/pjbs.2008.607.612 ↗