journal article·2009-06

Current-confined-path (CCP) giant magnetoresistive (GMR) sensors

Xilin Peng, Paul Kolbo, Konstantin Nikolaev, Shawn Chen, Zhongyan Wang, Tom Boonstra, Paul Anderson, Steven Kalderon, Peter Czoschke, Augusto Morrone, Dimitar Dimtrov, Song Xue, Yonghua Chen

Publisher page

Abstract

Current-perpendicular-to the plane (CPP) giant magnetoresistive (GMR) sensors with a current-confined-path (CCP) layer inserted within the Cu spacer have been manufactured using ultrahigh vacuum PVD sputtering, photolithography, and ion milling processes. Compared with a pure metallic CPP system, the CCP insertion layer enables a substantial increase in sensor resistance with an equivalent or better GMR ratio, and thus a significant improvement in the ΔRA amplitude. Heads with such a sensor have been tested under various bias currents, both quasistatically and on a spinstand. It was found that the resistance of the sensors increases with increasing bias current and voltage, following typical metallic behavior. Also, the CCP insertion layer enables operation at higher bias currents compared with the pure metallic sensors (without the insertion layer) and thus a higher output signal. This effect is attributed to less magnetic instability due to the reduced Ampere fields around the narrow (∼6 nm) current-confined paths. Finally, the CPP-GMR heads with CCP layer were tested under high-density recording conditions using the perpendicular recording media. Bit error rate (BER) as a function of linear density is reported. Microtrack profiles were also recorded to determine track density capability.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. Nagashaka · FUJISHU Sci. Technol. J. · 2001 · 37 · 192
2. Nagashaka · FUJISHU Sci. Technol. J. · 2006 · 42 · 149
3. Nakamoto · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2008 · 44 · 9510.1109/TMAG.2007.911022 ↗
4. Yuasa · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 92 · 264610.1063/1.1499744 ↗
5. Slater · J. Appl. Phys. · 2001 · 90 · 524210.1063/1.1412582 ↗
6. Nikolaev · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 07F53310.1063/1.2839344 ↗
7. Smith · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2005 · 41 · 293510.1109/TMAG.2005.855314 ↗
8. Fukuzawa · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2004 · 40 · 223610.1109/TMAG.2004.829185 ↗
9. Hoshino · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2006 · 42 · 245310.1109/TMAG.2006.878672 ↗
10. Jogo · IEEE Trans. Magn. · 2006 · 42 · 245610.1109/TMAG.2006.878681 ↗
11. K. Nagasaka, Y. Seyama, T. Sugawara, Y. Shimizu, A. Tanaka, US patent application #20030123200 A1, Magneto resistive element, July 3, 2003.
12. M. Carey, J.R. Childress, B.A. Gurney, US patent application #20020114974 A1, Heterogeneous spacers for CPP GMR stacks, August 22, 2002.
13. M. Hosomi, E. Makino, US patent application #20030062981 A1, Mangeto resistance effect element and magneto resistance effect type magnetic head, April 3, 2003.
14. S. Okuno, Y. Ohsawa, S. Haneda, Y. Kamiguchi, T. Kishi, US patent application #20030104249 A1, Magneto resistance effect element, its manufacturing method, magnetic reproducing element and magnetic memory, June 5, 2003.