Exchange mechanism of half-metallic ferromagnetism of TiO2 doped with double impurities: A first-principles ASW study
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The electronic structure and ferromagnetic properties of rutile TiO 2 doped with double-impurities Ti 1−2 x Cr x Mn x O 2 has been investigated using first-principles calculations within the density-functional theory (DFT) and the local density approximation (LDA), functional for treating the effects of exchange and correlation. They were performed using the scalar-relativistic implementation of the augmented spherical wave (ASW). The advantages of doping TiO 2 with double impurities instead of single impurities are the increase of the total moment of the system and the exhibition of the half-metallic ferromagnetic nature in Cr- and Mn-doped TiO 2 rutile. These behaviors are due to the hybridization of Cr 3d states and nearest-neighboring O 2p states. The spin–spin interaction between magnetic impurities examined by the total energy between parallel and antiparallel aligned states indicated that the Cr and Mn impurities are energetically favorable to be parallel coupled, which mean that the ferromagnetic state is more stable than the ferrimagnetic one. We proposed a bond magnetic polarons (BMP) model, based on localized carriers, to explain the mechanism of ferromagnetism in these systems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Heusler alloys: electronic and magnetic properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Matsumoto · Science · 2001 · 291 · 85410.1126/science.1056186 ↗
2. Matsumoto · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 2 · 2001 · 40 · L120410.1143/JJAP.40.L1204 ↗
3. Park · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 809310.1063/1.1452650 ↗
4. Wang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 93 · 787010.1063/1.1556122 ↗
5. Wang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 51810.1063/1.1593825 ↗
6. Hong · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 70 · 19520410.1103/PhysRevB.70.195204 ↗
7. Hong · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2004 · 281 · 34710.1016/j.jmmm.2004.04.125 ↗
8. Kim · Solid State Commun. · 2004 · 132 · 47710.1016/j.ssc.2004.08.016 ↗
9. Wang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 738410.1063/1.1667858 ↗
10. Wang · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 738110.1063/1.1667806 ↗
11. Suryanarayanan · J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2005 · 17 · 75510.1088/0953-8984/17/4/017 ↗
12. Inaba · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 2 · 2006 · 45 · L11410.1143/JJAP.45.L114 ↗
13. Bally · J. Phys. D · 1998 · 31 · 114910.1088/0022-3727/31/10/004 ↗
14. Wolf · Science · 2001 · 294 · 148810.1126/science.1065389 ↗
15. de Groot · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1983 · 50 · 202410.1103/PhysRevLett.50.2024 ↗
16. Lewis · Phys. Rev. B · 1997 · 55 · 102510.1103/PhysRevB.55.1025 ↗
17. Watts · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 61 · 962110.1103/PhysRevB.61.9621 ↗
18. Jedema · Nature · 2001 · 410 · 34510.1038/35066533 ↗
19. Soya · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 80 · 82310.1063/1.1446995 ↗
20. Liu · Phys. Rev. B · 2000 · 67 · 17241110.1103/PhysRevB.67.172411 ↗
21. Ya-Qiong · Physica B · 2003 · 329–333 · 1117
22. Yao · Solid State Commun. · 2005 · 133 · 30110.1016/j.ssc.2004.11.016 ↗
23. Xie · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2003 · 91 · 03720410.1103/PhysRevLett.91.037204 ↗
24. Ogawa · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 1999 · 196/197 · 42810.1016/S0304-8853(98)00794-X ↗
25. Yao · Physica B · 2005 · 366 · 6210.1016/j.physb.2005.05.024 ↗
26. Chambers · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 346710.1063/1.1420434 ↗
27. Kim · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 242110.1063/1.1509477 ↗
28. Park · Physica B · 2003 · 328 · 12010.1016/S0921-4526(02)01824-0 ↗
29. Park · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 16120110.1103/PhysRevB.65.161201 ↗
30. Geng · Phys. Rev. B · 2003 · 68 · 12520310.1103/PhysRevB.68.125203 ↗
31. Gao · J. Magn. Magn. Mater. · 2007 · 313 · 21010.1016/j.jmmm.2006.12.027 ↗
32. Errico · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 18442510.1103/PhysRevB.72.184425 ↗
33. Gao · Phys. Lett. A · 2006 · 359 · 52310.1016/j.physleta.2006.06.076 ↗
34. Chen · Phys. Rev. B · 2006 · 74 · 23520710.1103/PhysRevB.74.235207 ↗
35. Zhou · J. Appl. Phys. · 2008 · 103 · 08390710.1063/1.2905236 ↗
36. Vosko · Can. J. Phys. · 1980 · 58 · 120010.1139/p80-159 ↗
37. Williams · Phys. Rev. B · 1979 · 19 · 609410.1103/PhysRevB.19.6094 ↗
38. Eyert · Int. J. Quantum Chem. · 2000 · 77 · 100710.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(2000)77:6<1007::AID-QUA8>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
39. V. Eyert, The Augmented Spherical Wave Method: A Comprehensive Treatment, Lecture Notes in Physics vol. 719, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007.
40. Eyert · Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 57 · 1272710.1103/PhysRevB.57.12727 ↗
41. Eyert · J. Comp. Phys. · 1996 · 124 · 27110.1006/jcph.1996.0059 ↗
42. Blochl · Phys. Rev. B · 1994 · 49 · 1622310.1103/PhysRevB.49.16223 ↗
43. Bolzan · Acta Crystallogr. B · 1997 · 53 · 37310.1107/S0108768197001468 ↗
44. Pascual · Phys. Rev. B · 1978 · 18 · 560610.1103/PhysRevB.18.5606 ↗
45. Gao · Physica B · 2006 · 382 · 1410.1016/j.physb.2006.01.501 ↗
46. Murugan · Meas. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 16 · 24210.1088/0957-0233/16/1/032 ↗
47. Kaminski · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 88 · 24720210.1103/PhysRevLett.88.247202 ↗
48. Timm · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 89 · 13720110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.137201 ↗