Hierarchical carbon-coated FeP derived from FeOOH with enhanced sodium-storage performance
Source abstract
Abstract
As an energy-storage material, iron phosphide (FeP) has always been a research hotspot on account of its high theoretical capacity and low ion intercalation potential. However, its practical application is seriously limited by the structural damage and poor conductivity caused by the large volume expansion in the discharge process. In this work, the authors report a method combining hydrothermal synthesis with calcination to prepare a hollow sea-urchin-like FeP@C nanocomposite. The hollow sea-urchin-like structure can effectively alleviate volume expansion resulting from sodium (Na+)-ion intercalation. Carbon (C) coating not only limits the volume expansion and protects the integrity of the electrode structure but also improves electrical conductivity, promotes electron transmission, improves electrode reaction kinetics and thus improves the cycling performance of the FeP@C electrode. As an anode material of sodium-ion batteries, FeP@C showed good electrochemical performance with a capacity of 284.7 mAh/g after 200 cycles at a current density of 200 mA/g.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Green Catalysis Center, College of Chemistry, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Anyang Ecological Environmental Monitoring Center, Anyang, China
College of Pharmacy, Xinjiang Medical University, Ürümqi, China
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/451652a10.1038/451652a ↗
2. 10.1038/nchem.208510.1038/nchem.2085 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ensm.2015.11.00510.1016/j.ensm.2015.11.005 ↗
4. 10.1002/adfm.20180789510.1002/adfm.201807895 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20200302110.1002/adma.202003021 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.5b0659010.1021/acsami.5b06590 ↗
7. 10.1002/chem.20140251110.1002/chem.201402511 ↗
8. 10.1039/C6TA05238J10.1039/C6TA05238J ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.06010.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.060 ↗
10. 10.1007/s40820-019-0243-710.1007/s40820-019-0243-7 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.14910.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.149 ↗
12. 10.1002/aenm.20180028310.1002/aenm.201800283 ↗
13. 10.1002/adfm.20160132310.1002/adfm.201601323 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.04.01110.1016/j.ensm.2018.04.011 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20140684810.1002/anie.201406848 ↗
16. 10.1039/C8CC03827A10.1039/C8CC03827A ↗
17. Wang L · Electrochimica Acta · 2019 · 314 · 142
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.12.07710.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.12.077 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.9b0477410.1021/acsami.9b04774 ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20180829110.1002/adfm.201808291 ↗
21. 10.1002/aenm.20180256510.1002/aenm.201802565 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.05510.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.055 ↗
23. 10.1002/aenm.20150166610.1002/aenm.201501666 ↗
24. 10.1002/aenm.20170048810.1002/aenm.201700488 ↗
25. 10.1039/C6TA05317C10.1039/C6TA05317C ↗
26. 10.1002/celc.20160010110.1002/celc.201600101 ↗
27. 10.1039/C5RA18314F10.1039/C5RA18314F ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.03.00910.1016/j.ensm.2018.03.009 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0662510.1021/acsnano.7b06625 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.08.01510.1016/j.chempr.2018.08.015 ↗
31. Tang K · Frontiers in Chemistry · 2020 · 8
32. 10.1039/C8TA02863J10.1039/C8TA02863J ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20180049210.1002/adma.201800492 ↗
34. Hou H · Surface Innovations · 2018 · 6 · 56
35. 10.1002/aenm.20160270610.1002/aenm.201602706 ↗
36. 10.1039/C2NR32758A10.1039/C2NR32758A ↗
37. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.09.01010.1016/j.nanoen.2018.09.010 ↗
38. 10.1002/adfm.20160260810.1002/adfm.201602608 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0081610.1021/acsnano.9b00816 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0168110.1021/acsnano.0c01681 ↗
41. Wen L · Surface Innovations · 2018 · 6 · 13
42. 10.1680/jsuin.17.0006810.1680/jsuin.17.00068 ↗
43. 10.1002/aenm.20170028310.1002/aenm.201700283 ↗