Synergistic effect of inhibitor mixture based on enhanced electron transfer
Source abstract
Abstract
The inhibition performance of a mixture of an imidazoline quaternary ammonium salt (IM) and octylphenol polyoxyethene ether (OP) (IMO) toward carbon dioxide (CO2) corrosion of L245 steel in 3 wt% sodium chloride (NaCl) solution at 25°C was studied using electrochemical measurements. Notably, the inhibition efficiency of the IMO inhibitor stayed steadily in the long-term immersion test, and the inhibition efficiency increased with time. This was attributed to the improved electron-transfer performance between the inhibitor molecules and the metal surface. OP molecules promoted electrons to the metal, while IM molecules accepted electrons from the metal. The interactions between the inhibitor molecules and metal surface were enhanced, and the relative bonding intensities were improved. Moreover, the adsorption configurations of the mixture of IM and OP facilitated the improvement of the thickness and the compactness of the inhibitor layer. OP and IM showed a good synergistic inhibition effect.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing, People’s Republic of China
College of Safety and Environmental Engineering, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, People’s Republic of China
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.5006/095010.5006/0950 ↗
2. 10.1515/corrrev-2014-006710.1515/corrrev-2014-0067 ↗
3. 10.5006/022210.5006/0222 ↗
4. 10.1179/14784220422501696710.1179/147842204225016967 ↗
5. 10.1179/147842204X287110.1179/147842204X2871 ↗
6. 10.1680/jsuin.18.0001510.1680/jsuin.18.00015 ↗
7. 10.1680/jsuin.19.0006310.1680/jsuin.19.00063 ↗
8. 10.1680/jsuin.15.0001310.1680/jsuin.15.00013 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.09.03310.1016/j.jiec.2014.09.033 ↗
10. 10.1021/ie503508h10.1021/ie503508h ↗
11. 10.5006/085410.5006/0854 ↗
12. 10.5006/177710.5006/1777 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.01.00510.1016/j.arabjc.2015.01.005 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.corsci.2014.11.00710.1016/j.corsci.2014.11.007 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.08.10910.1016/j.apsusc.2013.08.109 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0010-938X(02)00246-910.1016/S0010-938X(02)00246-9 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.01.03110.1016/j.apsusc.2008.01.031 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.corsci.2016.07.00610.1016/j.corsci.2016.07.006 ↗
19. 10.1021/jp980939v10.1021/jp980939v ↗
20. 10.1021/cm500365c10.1021/cm500365c ↗
21. 10.1021/ie301465k10.1021/ie301465k ↗
22. Qiang Y · Chemical Engineering Journal · 2020 · 406
23. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.09.16010.1016/j.electacta.2014.09.160 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.19010.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.190 ↗
25. Han P · Scientific Reports · 2016 · 6
26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.21640510.1103/PhysRevLett.97.216405 ↗
27. 10.1021/ja00035a00110.1021/ja00035a001 ↗
28. 10.1021/ja00332a07310.1021/ja00332a073 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.corsci.2017.05.02610.1016/j.corsci.2017.05.026 ↗