journal article·2017-12-01

Substrate temperature effects on structural and photoelectric properties of CdS thin films

Jitao Li, Dingyu Yang, Xinghua Zhu

Surface Innovations· Volume 5· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Cadmium sulfide thin films were deposited on quartz substrates by magnetron sputtering method with varying substrate temperatures. X-ray diffraction patterns of prepared samples showed preferred orientation of (002) with pure hexagonal phase. Atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy images exhibited a surface morphology with uniform and homogeneous grains. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) revealed peaks corresponding to cadmium, sulfur, carbon and oxygen atoms, and the high-resolution XPS surveys for cadmium 3d and sulfur 2p showed an obvious shift to lower binding energy as the substrate temperature raised. Meanwhile, the optical absorption coefficient gradually increased, and the transmittance was approximately 75%. The optical energy gap was as high as 2·40 eV at the substrate temperature of 200°C. Photoconductivity curves presented a rapid response, the lowest conductivity at steady state (only 1·6257 × 10−4 Ω−1 cm−1) and a high solar photoconductivity gain (G p = 296·36) at substrate temperatures of up to 200°C.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Optoelectronic Technology, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, China

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0040-6090(94)06257-L10.1016/0040-6090(94)06257-L ↗
2. 10.1063/1.34149310.1063/1.341493 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.33058310.1063/1.330583 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00124-710.1016/S0040-6090(97)00124-7 ↗
5. 10.1002/1521-3951(200201)229:2<1015::AID-PSSB1015>3.0.CO;2-310.1002/1521-3951(200201)229:2<1015::AID-PSSB1015>3.0.CO;2-3 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.12.00510.1016/j.jmmm.2013.12.005 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.solmat.2007.12.00210.1016/j.solmat.2007.12.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.12210.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.122 ↗
9. Ohyama H · Journal of Applied Physics · 1997 · 36 · 6304
10. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.29810.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.298 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.tsf.2013.10.16810.1016/j.tsf.2013.10.168 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ica.2015.05.02410.1016/j.ica.2015.05.024 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.08910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.089 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2012.06.01410.1016/j.vacuum.2012.06.014 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.11.06510.1016/j.tsf.2014.11.065 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cap.2016.07.00910.1016/j.cap.2016.07.009 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.11710.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.117 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.mssp.2016.11.02310.1016/j.mssp.2016.11.023 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.11.08010.1016/j.tsf.2005.11.080 ↗
20. 10.1134/S106378261005005210.1134/S1063782610050052 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.10.04010.1016/j.solmat.2016.10.040 ↗
22. 10.1021/jp304169210.1021/jp3041692 ↗
23. 10.1039/c2jm31410j10.1039/c2jm31410j ↗
24. 10.1166/jnn.2010.173010.1166/jnn.2010.1730 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.24710.1016/j.jallcom.2015.08.247 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.06.04910.1016/j.ultramic.2005.06.049 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mssp.2016.12.01610.1016/j.mssp.2016.12.016 ↗