journal article·2022-05-01

Yolk–shell structured sulfur composite cathode for high performance lithium–sulfur battery

Kaikai Tang, Jun Xiao, Mengqi Long, Jun Chen, Hong Gao, Hao Liu

Surface Innovations· Volume 10· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs) suffer from the unavoidable ‘shuttle effects’ of lithium polysulfides (LPSs) and the infinite volume change of the sulfur. Herein, the authors prepared a yolk–shell structured N-doped carbon nanotubes/sulfur/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nanotube (N-CNTs/S@PEDOT) composite as a cathode for LSBs. The yolk–shell structure with void spaces can effectively buffer the volume expansion of sulfur, while the outer ‘shell’ can act as a physical barrier to minimise the ‘shuttle effects’ of LPSs. Moreover, the N-CNTs with high conductivity and superior structural stability are able to improve the electron transfer efficiency and cycling performance. Therefore, the specially designed yolk–shell structured N-CNTs/S@PEDOT composite cathode exhibits an extraordinary rate performance and enhanced cycling stability (602 mAh g−1 after 200 cycles at 0.1 C).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Perovskite Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Joint International Laboratory on Environmental and Energy Frontier Materials, School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China

Joint International Laboratory on Environmental and Energy Frontier Materials, School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China; Centre for Clean Energy Technology, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adfm.20190946910.1002/adfm.201909469 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20200216810.1002/adma.202002168 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10539310.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105393 ↗
4. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0252710.1021/acsenergylett.0c02527 ↗
5. 10.1002/aenm.20210044810.1002/aenm.202100448 ↗
6. 10.1002/aenm.20190393410.1002/aenm.201903934 ↗
7. Zhao M · Advanced Materials · 2021 · 33 · article e200729
8. 10.1016/j.esci.2021.08.00110.1016/j.esci.2021.08.001 ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20190768010.1002/adfm.201907680 ↗
10. 10.1002/advs.20200203710.1002/advs.202002037 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0471910.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04719 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20190395510.1002/adma.201903955 ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20190287210.1002/aenm.201902872 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0611210.1021/acsnano.0c06112 ↗
15. 10.1002/aenm.20200128510.1002/aenm.202001285 ↗
16. 10.1039/D0TA10515E10.1039/D0TA10515E ↗
17. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0799910.1021/acsnano.0c07999 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10455510.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104555 ↗
19. 10.3389/fchem.2020.59597210.3389/fchem.2020.595972 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10389410.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103894 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20170639110.1002/adfm.201706391 ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20170028310.1002/aenm.201700283 ↗
23. 10.1039/D1QM00179E10.1039/D1QM00179E ↗
24. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0712110.1021/acsnano.9b07121 ↗
25. 10.1002/advs.20190071110.1002/advs.201900711 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20200065110.1002/aenm.202000651 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20190635710.1002/adma.201906357 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0390610.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03906 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsnano.9b0662910.1021/acsnano.9b06629 ↗
30. 10.1021/ja409508q10.1021/ja409508q ↗
31. 10.1039/C6EE02364A10.1039/C6EE02364A ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.10.01110.1016/j.ensm.2018.10.011 ↗
33. 10.1039/D0QM00120A10.1039/D0QM00120A ↗
34. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.00110.1016/j.nanoen.2018.10.001 ↗
35. 10.1002/aenm.20180106610.1002/aenm.201801066 ↗
36. 10.1002/aenm.20190355010.1002/aenm.201903550 ↗
37. 10.1002/anie.20191497210.1002/anie.201914972 ↗
38. 10.1038/s41467-017-00575-810.1038/s41467-017-00575-8 ↗