journal article·2023-08-01

Leidenfrost instability in a circular container and its suppression using a rod

Manjarik Mrinal, Xiang Wang, Zhenxue Han, Cheng Luo

Surface Innovations· Volume 11· Issue 6-7
Publisher page

Abstract

Leidenfrost drops have demonstrated promising applications in, for example, drag reduction. However, large Leidenfrost drops may be unstable when their diameters exceed a critical value, leading to less control of such drops in their applications. In this work, through theoretical and experimental investigations, the authors explore the instability of a Leidenfrost drop in a circular configuration, as well as the suppression of this instability using a small rod. There are four findings. First, the diameter of the largest inscribed cylinder inside a rod–container configuration is the critical dimension for determining Leidenfrost instability. Second, in the cases of water and isopropyl alcohol, the threshold value of this diameter is 8.3λ ± 0.3λ, where λ is the capillary length of the liquid. Third, due to the specific interface profile between the liquid drop and the surrounding vapor layer, the threshold diameter of a circular container for instability to occur is slightly larger than its counterpart in the corresponding Rayleigh–Taylor instability problem. Fourth and finally, placing a rod inside a circular container reduces the size of the largest inscribed cylinder in the container. If the diameter of this inscribed cylinder is below the threshold value, the instability inside the container is suppressed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Fluid Dynamics and Thin Films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0017-9310(66)90111-610.1016/0017-9310(66)90111-6 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0142010.1021/acs.langmuir.7b01420 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41598-017-12279-610.1038/s41598-017-12279-6 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41567-018-0275-910.1038/s41567-018-0275-9 ↗
5. 10.1038/nmat165610.1038/nmat1656 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.15450210.1103/PhysRevLett.96.154502 ↗
7. Arter J · Physical Review Letters · 2018 · 113 · article 243704
8. 10.1002/anie.20160589910.1002/anie.201605899 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20060169410.1002/adma.200601694 ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms340010.1038/ncomms3400 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.21450110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.214501 ↗
12. 10.1038/nature1141810.1038/nature11418 ↗
13. Biance AL 2004 Gouttes Inertielles: de la Caléfaction à l'Étalement. PhD thesis University of Paris VI Paris, France
14. 10.1063/1.157216110.1063/1.1572161 ↗
15. 10.1112/plms/s1-14.1.17010.1112/plms/s1-14.1.170 ↗
16. Taylor GI · Proceedings of the Royal Society A · 1950 · 201 · 192
17. 10.1016/0167-2789(84)90510-410.1016/0167-2789(84)90510-4 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.1.05190210.1103/PhysRevFluids.1.051902 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.120310.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1203 ↗
20. 10.1017/S002211209200144710.1017/S0022112092001447 ↗
21. Chandrasekhar S · 1961 · 428
22. Maxwell JC · 1890
23. Yih CS · 1980
24. Bell GI · 1951
25. 10.1115/1.289593810.1115/1.2895938 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.172152910.1063/1.1721529 ↗
27. 10.1209/0295-5075/100/5400610.1209/0295-5075/100/54006 ↗
28. 10.1038/srep0528010.1038/srep05280 ↗
29. 10.1146/annurev-fluid-011212-14070910.1146/annurev-fluid-011212-140709 ↗
30. Adamson AV · 1990
31. 10.1103/PhysRevE.79.03630710.1103/PhysRevE.79.036307 ↗