Machine-learning methods to predict the wetting properties of iron-based composites
Source abstract
Abstract
The authors used three different methods of statistical data analysis to establish correlations between the water contact angle (CA) on ductile iron and composition, roughness (grit size), elapsed time between sample preparation and CA measurement and droplet size. The three methods are linear regression analysis (LRA), artificial neural network (ANN) model and multivariate polynomial regression analysis. It was established that the size of the water droplet is statistically insignificant, while correlations with the other three parameters were found. Surface roughness is the most important predictor of CA. A low coefficient of determination of the linear regression indicates that the correlation is non-linear. The ANN model showed much stronger predictive potential than LRA. The authors discuss the correlation with the experimental values of the CA and the physical mechanisms behind the observed trends. It is particularly promising that the ANN can be trained to predict the wetting characteristics. The application of machine-learning methods to synthesize new materials and coatings with desired surface properties, such as self-cleaning, is a technology that may become part of the emergent ‘triboinformatics’ field, related to the application of machine-learning methods to surface science and engineering.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-1-4614-1945-710.1007/978-1-4614-1945-7 ↗
2. Snijders C · International Journal of Internet Science · 2012 · 7 · 1
3. 10.1063/PT.3.188610.1063/PT.3.1886 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conb.2008.08.01010.1016/j.conb.2008.08.010 ↗
5. Berry DM · 2017
6. 10.1109/MMUL.2018.02312116710.1109/MMUL.2018.023121167 ↗
7. Bormashenko E · Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society A · 2020 · 378
8. Pauschitz A · AC2T News · 2019
9. Nosonovsky M · 2011
10. 10.1039/C5CP04462F10.1039/C5CP04462F ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jcis.2010.08.04710.1016/j.jcis.2010.08.047 ↗
12. 10.1179/1743284712Y.000000008810.1179/1743284712Y.0000000088 ↗
13. Montgomery DC · 2010
14. Bluman AG · 2004
15. Montgomery DC · 2017
16. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b0239510.1021/acs.langmuir.9b02395 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.06.16610.1016/j.apsusc.2015.06.166 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0143-8166(00)00007-510.1016/S0143-8166(00)00007-5 ↗
19. 10.1021/la100231u10.1021/la100231u ↗
20. 10.1021/la501832810.1021/la5018328 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.55568810.1063/1.555688 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.07.04310.1016/j.corsci.2013.07.043 ↗
23. 10.1007/978-3-030-36408-3_2610.1007/978-3-030-36408-3_26 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.10054910.1016/j.surfin.2020.100549 ↗
25. 10.1021/ja02242a00410.1021/ja02242a004 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cej.2009.09.01310.1016/j.cej.2009.09.013 ↗
27. 10.1143/JPSJ.48.202210.1143/JPSJ.48.2022 ↗
28. 10.1088/0034-4885/12/1/30810.1088/0034-4885/12/1/308 ↗
29. 10.1021/la047456510.1021/la0474565 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0052210.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00522 ↗