journal article·2018-09-01

Influence of both hardfaced and nitrided layers on the durability of hot forging tools

Zbigniew Gronostajski, Paweł Widomski, Marcin Kaszuba, Maciej Zwierzchowski, Marek Hawryluk

Surface Innovations· Volume 6· Issue 4–5
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents the results of preliminary operational tests of forging dies made with a new hybrid technology combining the self-shielded arc surfacing (hardfacing) and gas nitriding operations. Heat-treated and nitrided tools as well as hardfaced tools were tested as a reference. Dies were used for a similar number of forging cycles and then withdrawn from production and analyzed. Analysis covered the measurement of wear geometry using a three-dimensional scanner, macroscopic tests, microstructure study, microhardness analysis and observations under scanning electron microscopy. Test results indicate a beneficial effect of the new technology’s application, since elevated resistance to fatigue cracking and abrasive wear was demonstrated. Results were compared with reference tools prepared by only hardfacing or only nitriding, which were less resistatnt, of which nitriding brought more resistance to wear than hardfacing. These preliminary studies justify further studies leading to the development of this new technology for surface layer treatment of forging tools by hardfacing combined with nitriding.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Advanced materials and composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Wrocław, Poland

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Deshpande M · 2011
2. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.25610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.256 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0142-1123(98)00064-410.1016/S0142-1123(98)00064-4 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0043-1648(96)07442-X10.1016/S0043-1648(96)07442-X ↗
5. 10.1016/j.acme.2014.07.00210.1016/j.acme.2014.07.002 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.acme.2016.06.00110.1016/j.acme.2016.06.001 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.03.02310.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.03.023 ↗
9. 10.1007/s00170-016-9499-y10.1007/s00170-016-9499-y ↗
10. 10.2320/matertrans.MER200762210.2320/matertrans.MER2007622 ↗
11. Loh NH · Precision Engineering – Journal of the International Societies for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology · 1993 · 15 · 100
12. Balu CU · IJAEGT · 2016 · 4 · 1771
13. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.12.01010.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.12.010 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.03.02910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.03.029 ↗
15. 10.1515/amm-2017-023810.1515/amm-2017-0238 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00118-810.1016/S0257-8972(99)00118-8 ↗
17. 10.1179/02670849910151674010.1179/026708499101516740 ↗
18. 10.30657/pea.2017.06.0710.30657/pea.2017.06.07 ↗
19. Pytel S · Archives of Foundry Engineering · 2010 · 10 · 5
20. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.08.02010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.08.020 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.wear.2006.08.02810.1016/j.wear.2006.08.028 ↗
22. Minguez R · 2016 · 811
23. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.05.11310.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.05.113 ↗
24. 10.1080/09507116.2013.79664210.1080/09507116.2013.796642 ↗
25. ISO (International Organization for Standardization) · 2008
26. ISO · 2007
27. ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers) · 2004