journal article·2016-09-01

Importance of oxide film in endovascular biodegradable zinc stents

Adam J. Drelich, Patrick K. Bowen, Leslie LaLonde, Jeremy Goldman, Jaroslaw W. Drelich

Surface Innovations· Volume 4· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

A better understanding of the surface oxide film on biodegradable metals could lead to the design of smarter, surface-responsive biodegradable stents with good biocompatibility and controlled degradation rates at different stages of implantation. In this study, the surface finish of zinc was manipulated through different material processing conditions, including oxidation, electropolishing and anodization. Implant wires with oxide films of varying surface characteristics were degraded in a living organism by using a rodent model to understand their response to a biological endovascular environment. It was found that the degradation rate was mainly dependent on the quality and stability of oxide film. Defects/cracks in the oxide film structure appear to serve as local corrosion sites, and their increased density accelerates the biocorrosion rate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1056/NEJM19940825331080210.1056/NEJM199408253310802 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0735-1097(97)00334-310.1016/S0735-1097(97)00334-3 ↗
3. 10.1161/01.CIR.98.18.187510.1161/01.CIR.98.18.1875 ↗
4. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000019071.72887.BD10.1161/01.CIR.0000019071.72887.BD ↗
5. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.65823710.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.658237 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.02.03310.1016/j.ijcard.2007.02.033 ↗
7. 10.1179/174329008X28486810.1179/174329008X284868 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.02510.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.025 ↗
9. 10.1136/heart.89.6.65110.1136/heart.89.6.651 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cossms.2009.04.00110.1016/j.cossms.2009.04.001 ↗
11. 10.1002/adhm.20150101910.1002/adhm.201501019 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20130022610.1002/adma.201300226 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.02210.1016/j.msec.2015.07.022 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0003510.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00035 ↗
15. 10.1002/adhm.20150018910.1002/adhm.201500189 ↗
16. 10.1002/jbm.a.3517910.1002/jbm.a.35179 ↗
17. 10.1002/jbm.b.3192210.1002/jbm.b.31922 ↗
18. 10.1002/jbm.b.3192210.1002/jbm.b.31922 ↗
19. Wang JL · Surface Topography – Metrology and Properties · 2016 · 4 · 9–17
20. 10.1021/jp404411b10.1021/jp404411b ↗