DataVXSurface InnovationsPaper
journal article·2014-09

Common surface potential of two different crystal planes

Nikola Kallay, Tajana Preocˇanin, Marin Sapunar, Danijel Namjesnik

Surface Innovations· Volume 2· Issue 3
Publisher page
Source abstract

Abstract

Crystals have different planes of different structures. In contact with aqueous environment, they exhibit different behaviors and different interfacial equilibriums. Surface potentials of individual crystal planes could be measured with single-crystal electrodes. In reality, these planes are not separated but rather electrically connected through the bulk of the crystal so that common potential is established. The value of common potential lies between values of separated individual planes. In the equilibration process, one plane may dominate. The problem was considered by numerical simulation based on surface complexation model and experimentally. Discussion was extended to one surface with different active surface sites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions · Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Full professor, Department of Chemistry, Division of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Associate professor, Department of Chemistry, Division of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Graduate student, Department of Chemistry, Division of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

Expert assistant, Division of Physical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.5562/cca206210.5562/cca2062 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.08.02710.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.08.027 ↗
3. Hunter R. J. · 1981
4. 10.1016/j.jcis.2006.12.07510.1016/j.jcis.2006.12.075 ↗
5. 10.1006/jcis.1996.024210.1006/jcis.1996.0242 ↗
6. Lützenkirchen J. · 2006
7. 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.09.09010.1016/j.jcis.2007.09.090 ↗
8. 10.1039/b417902a10.1039/b417902a ↗
9. 10.1021/la401509y10.1021/la401509y ↗
10. 10.5796/electrochemistry.77.210.5796/electrochemistry.77.2 ↗
11. 10.1021/la061900h10.1021/la061900h ↗
12. 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.03.15210.1016/j.cplett.2005.03.152 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.gca.2013.06.04210.1016/j.gca.2013.06.042 ↗
14. 10.1126/science.115483310.1126/science.1154833 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.gca.2011.05.01310.1016/j.gca.2011.05.013 ↗
16. 10.1021/la300829c10.1021/la300829c ↗
17. 10.1007/BF0149856810.1007/BF01498568 ↗
18. Bates R. G. · 1973
19. 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.05.05110.1016/j.jcis.2009.05.051 ↗
20. 10.1021/la303584a10.1021/la303584a ↗
21. 10.1006/jcis.1996.005110.1006/jcis.1996.0051 ↗