journal article·2016-02

Drag reducing surface fabrication with deformed sharkskin morphology

Y. H. Luo, X. Li, D. Y. Zhang, Y. F. Liu

Surface Engineering· Volume 32· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

The superiority of sharkskin is the consequence of nature selection and self-evolution. The nano/microhierarchical structure covering over sharkskin can match its living surroundings perfectly, whereas the best drag reducing effect cannot be implemented at all circumstances. Therefore, it is necessary to adjust the size and shape of sharkskin morphology to accommodate more potential flowing conditions. In this paper, the stretching deformed fabrication process of sharkskin surface is explored and investigated, and the super-hydrophobic and hydrodynamic drag reduction effect is inspected. The experimental results in the water tunnel indicate that the stretched sharkskin can expand the speed scope of applications with satisfactory drag reduction effect. Additionally, the drag reduction mechanism is explained and derived comprehensively, which has important significance to apprehend sharkskin effect.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Engineering and Applied Science, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA

School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China

Art College, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Luo Y. H. · J. Mech. Med. Biol · 2015 · 15 · 1530084
2. 10.1126/science.202.4369.74710.1126/science.202.4369.747 ↗
3. 10.1088/0960-1317/23/7/07501810.1088/0960-1317/23/7/075018 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1001-6058(10)60105-910.1016/S1001-6058(10)60105-9 ↗
5. 10.1166/jsim.2014.104710.1166/jsim.2014.1047 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00114005069610.1007/s001140050696 ↗
7. 10.1142/S021951941450029810.1142/S0219519414500298 ↗
8. 10.1166/asl.2012.196510.1166/asl.2012.1965 ↗
9. 10.1142/S021951941530002110.1142/S0219519415300021 ↗
10. 10.2514/3.6012610.2514/3.60126 ↗
11. 10.1017/S002211209600467310.1017/S0022112096004673 ↗
12. 10.1017/S002211208900224710.1017/S0022112089002247 ↗
13. Luo Y. · Oil Gas-Eur. Mag · 2012 · 38 · 213
14. Deyuan Z. · Oil Gas-Eur. Mag · 2011 · 37 · 85
15. Zhang D. Y. · Pipeline Gas J · 2011 · 238 · 58
16. Luo Y. · Oil Gas-Eur. Mag · 2014 · 40 · 85
17. 10.1242/jeb.06304010.1242/jeb.063040 ↗
18. 10.1242/jeb.09709710.1242/jeb.097097 ↗
19. 10.1088/1748-3182/3/4/04600510.1088/1748-3182/3/4/046005 ↗
20. 10.4031/MTSJ.45.4.1210.4031/MTSJ.45.4.12 ↗
21. 10.1088/0960-1317/25/1/01700210.1088/0960-1317/25/1/017002 ↗
22. 10.1002/app.3940210.1002/app.39402 ↗
23. 10.1088/0960-1317/23/7/07501810.1088/0960-1317/23/7/075018 ↗
24. 10.1098/rsta.2010.020110.1098/rsta.2010.0201 ↗
25. 10.1088/0953-8984/22/3/03510410.1088/0953-8984/22/3/035104 ↗
26. 10.1007/s11434-008-0219-310.1007/s11434-008-0219-3 ↗
27. 10.1007/s11434-010-4163-710.1007/s11434-010-4163-7 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11431-008-0080-210.1007/s11431-008-0080-2 ↗