journal article·2023-06

Mechanical optimisation of Ni coatings produced by low-pressure cold spray

Felice Rubino, David Merino-Millan, Fausto Tucci, Pedro Poza

Surface Engineering· Volume 39· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Nickel-based coatings are widely used as thermal barriers in several sectors thanks to their remarkable corrosion and wear resistance and outstanding stability at high temperatures. Recently, Ni coatings, produced with thermal spraying and vacuum techniques, have been investigated for solar power energy applications. In the present manuscript, low-pressure cold spray (LPCS) was used to deposit pure Nickel onto a steel substrate. The influence of gas temperature, nozzle stand-off distance, and advancing speed on morphological and mechanical properties were studied. The optimal deposition conditions were derived by ANOVA analysis. The hardness and the adhesion strength were approximately 160 HV and 26 MPa, respectively. The highest thickness obtained under the optimised deposition with a single pass was around 900 µm.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · High Entropy Alloys Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

DIMME – Durability and Mechanical Integrity of Structural Materials, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles (Madrid), Spain

Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Fisciano (Salerno), Italy

Funding

European Union’s Horizon 2020 research · Comunidad de Madrid

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/met1109137710.3390/met11091377 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.solmat.2022.11183910.1016/j.solmat.2022.111839 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.12957010.1016/j.surfcoat.2023.129570 ↗
4. 10.1080/02670844.2018.155176810.1080/02670844.2018.1551768 ↗
5. 10.1080/02670844.2019.158609610.1080/02670844.2019.1586096 ↗
6. 10.1016/J.WEAR.2020.20333710.1016/J.WEAR.2020.203337 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.35310.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.353 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.503495110.1063/1.5034951 ↗
9. 10.3390/coatings806021910.3390/coatings8060219 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11663-016-0636-710.1007/s11663-016-0636-7 ↗
11. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.91310.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.651-653.913 ↗
12. 10.3390/met608018510.3390/met6080185 ↗
13. 10.1016/J.PMATSCI.2021.10083910.1016/J.PMATSCI.2021.100839 ↗
14. 10.1080/02670844.2021.196702410.1080/02670844.2021.1967024 ↗
15. 10.1080/02670844.2021.192450610.1080/02670844.2021.1924506 ↗
16. 10.1080/02670844.2022.207342410.1080/02670844.2022.2073424 ↗
17. 10.1179/1743294415Y.000000001810.1179/1743294415Y.0000000018 ↗
18. 10.1179/1743294414Y.000000027010.1179/1743294414Y.0000000270 ↗
19. 10.1179/1743294413Y.000000014810.1179/1743294413Y.0000000148 ↗
20. 10.1080/02670844.2017.131222110.1080/02670844.2017.1312221 ↗
21. 10.1080/02670844.2017.128755510.1080/02670844.2017.1287555 ↗
22. 10.1080/02670844.2017.137187210.1080/02670844.2017.1371872 ↗
23. 10.1002/maco.20110638710.1002/maco.201106387 ↗
24. 10.1007/S11666-007-9060-5/FIGURES/1610.1007/S11666-007-9060-5/FIGURES/16 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.06.02610.1016/j.apsusc.2007.06.026 ↗
26. 10.1007/s11666-016-0430-810.1007/s11666-016-0430-8 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.03.04610.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.03.046 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.00110.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.001 ↗
29. 10.1108/ACMM-11-2014-147010.1108/ACMM-11-2014-1470 ↗
30. Montgomery DC. · 2017
31. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11698010.1016/j.compstruct.2023.116980 ↗
32. 10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2008.06.00310.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2008.06.003 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.04.01810.1016/j.corsci.2018.04.018 ↗
34. 10.1007/s11666-018-0695-110.1007/s11666-018-0695-1 ↗
35. 10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2009.07.06110.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2009.07.061 ↗
36. 10.1002/adem.20220060310.1002/adem.202200603 ↗
37. 10.1007/s11666-013-9890-210.1007/s11666-013-9890-2 ↗
38. 10.1007/s11666-017-0636-410.1007/s11666-017-0636-4 ↗