Factors influencing the nanostructure of obliquely deposited thin films
Source abstract
Abstract
In this piece of work, silica thin films were deposited by RF magnetron reactive sputtering exploiting the mechanism of oblique angle deposition. Here, change in the structure of the films with a change in the oblique angle of deposition and target to substrate distance has been studied with some emphasis on the role of the atomic weight of silicon in influencing the collisional process and directionality of the sputtered atoms. The films deposited at a lower target to substrate distance are compact and possess a columnar structure when deposited at higher oblique angles. The films deposited at higher target to substrate distance do not show any change in the tilt angle of the nanocolumnar structure with change in the oblique angle of deposition. This shows that the mean free path of the sputtered atoms plays a major role in the evolution of the structures of the thin films.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Optical Coatings and Gratings · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Advanced Materials Technology Department, CSIR-Institute of Minerals and Materials Technology, Bhubaneswar, India
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1143/APEX.3.08250210.1143/APEX.3.082502 ↗
2. 10.1143/APEX.4.05250310.1143/APEX.4.052503 ↗
3. 10.1364/OE.16.00518610.1364/OE.16.005186 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.09.09310.1016/j.apsusc.2009.09.093 ↗
5. 10.1002/adfm.20120103210.1002/adfm.201201032 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0269253810.1007/BF02692538 ↗
7. 10.1080/02670844.2016.123175810.1080/02670844.2016.1231758 ↗
8. 10.1080/02670844.2017.129270410.1080/02670844.2017.1292704 ↗
9. 10.1080/10426914.2014.89297310.1080/10426914.2014.892973 ↗
10. 10.1179/1743294414Y.000000039910.1179/1743294414Y.0000000399 ↗
11. 10.1179/1743294415Y.000000008110.1179/1743294415Y.0000000081 ↗
12. 10.1038/nphoton.2007.2610.1038/nphoton.2007.26 ↗
13. 10.1364/OL.31.00060110.1364/OL.31.000601 ↗
14. 10.1016/0921-4526(94)90273-910.1016/0921-4526(94)90273-9 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.162171710.1063/1.1621717 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.physb.2010.05.07510.1016/j.physb.2010.05.075 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.11.00610.1016/j.apsusc.2013.11.006 ↗
18. 10.1116/1.160161010.1116/1.1601610 ↗
19. Nieuwenhuizen JM · Philips Tech Rev · 1966 · 27 · 87
20. 10.1016/0040-6090(93)90378-310.1016/0040-6090(93)90378-3 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.06.07310.1016/j.tsf.2011.06.073 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.36732510.1063/1.367325 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.369195010.1063/1.3691950 ↗
24. 10.3938/jkps.57.165710.3938/jkps.57.1657 ↗
25. 10.1116/1.276408210.1116/1.2764082 ↗
26. 10.1166/sam.2016.289510.1166/sam.2016.2895 ↗
27. 10.1143/JJAP.33.114010.1143/JJAP.33.1140 ↗
28. 10.1557/JMR.1999.016210.1557/JMR.1999.0162 ↗
29. Machlin ES. · 1995
30. 10.1088/0022-3727/46/4/04530610.1088/0022-3727/46/4/045306 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.272025710.1063/1.2720257 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.201060910.1063/1.2010609 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.239283010.1063/1.2392830 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.06.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.06.003 ↗
35. 10.1021/am201462910.1021/am2014629 ↗