Electrochemical stability properties of titanium-doped WO 3 electrochromic thin films
Source abstract
Abstract
Pure, 5% Ti-doped and 10% Ti-doped WO 3 thin films were prepared by the radio frequency magnetron sputtering and characterised by a SEM, an electrochemical workstation and an UV–VIS–NIR spectrophotometer. Research results showed that Ti doping had no apparent influence on the surface morphology and optical band gap. It could also be found that the addition of Ti has little interference with the electrochromic property of WO 3 in both bleached and coloured states at initial cycles from electrochemical and optical test results, while there were apparent differences in the optical transmittance and inserted and extracted charge with increasing cycles. This is attributed that Ti-doped WO 3 thin films allow facile ion interaction/extraction and have less ion residues, which can stabilise the electrochemical cycling performance. Furthermore, the data we have obtained indicate that 5% Ti-doped WO 3 film has the best electrochromic property.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Conducting polymers and applications · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CAS Key Laboratory of Inorganic Coating Materials, Shanghai Institute of Ceramics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200050, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Granqvist C. G., Azens A., Smulko J., and L. B. Kish: ‘Oxide-based electrochromics for energy efficient buildings: materials, technologies, testing, and perspectives’, Conference on Functional Materials and Nanotechnologies, 2007, 93, 1–9.10.1088/1742-6596/93/1/012021 ↗
2. 10.1179/1743294414Y.000000045010.1179/1743294414Y.0000000450 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0927-0248(99)00088-410.1016/S0927-0248(99)00088-4 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.03.02810.1016/j.solmat.2015.03.028 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.10.10510.1016/j.jallcom.2007.10.105 ↗
6. 10.1038/nature1239810.1038/nature12398 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.physb.2014.07.02910.1016/j.physb.2014.07.029 ↗
8. 10.1002/adfm.20100247710.1002/adfm.201002477 ↗
9. 10.1364/AO.47.00C21910.1364/AO.47.00C219 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00340-013-5581-410.1007/s00340-013-5581-4 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.10.02610.1016/j.solmat.2010.10.026 ↗
12. 10.1039/c2jm32742b10.1039/c2jm32742b ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0470710.1021/acs.jpcc.5b04707 ↗
14. 10.1038/nmat436810.1038/nmat4368 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.5b0903510.1021/acsami.5b09035 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0219710.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02197 ↗
17. 10.1109/LED.2015.239700210.1109/LED.2015.2397002 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11665-014-1094-510.1007/s11665-014-1094-5 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20140044710.1002/adma.201400447 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.06.04710.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.06.047 ↗
21. 10.1021/am400625810.1021/am4006258 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10853-012-6591-z10.1007/s10853-012-6591-z ↗
23. 10.1021/am101209d10.1021/am101209d ↗
24. 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.02.03710.1016/j.solmat.2014.02.037 ↗