journal article·2004-06

Industrial Application of Pulsed Dc Bias Power Supplies in Closed Field Unbalanced Magnetron Sputter Ion Plating

K.E. Cooke, J. Hampshire, W. Southall, D.G. Teer

Surface Engineering· Volume 20· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Pulsed dc power supplies are now commonly used in the reactive magnetron deposition of dielectric coatings from conductive or partially conductive sputtering targets. Their advantages, particularly the elimination of arcing and enhanced process stability are well recognised. In comparison, the application of pulsed dc power to the biasing of substrates in ion plating processes has received much less attention. The present study draws on experience with a range of pulsed dc bias supplies in industrial coating equipment, exploiting closed field unbalanced magnetron sputtering technology. Pulsed plasma characteristics have an impact on all stages of the coating process, from initial surface cleaning through to interface formation and the coating of components, requiring the appropriate selection of pulsing parameters. The synergistic interaction of pulsed dc bias, dc and pulsed dc closed field magnetron sources is explored. Practical considerations, such as the processing of thermally sensitive materials and the preservation of critical surface characteristics, are also discussed. SE/517
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Teer Coatings Limited, West Stone House, Berry Hill Industrial Estate, Droitwich, Worcestershire WR9 9AS, UK (kevin.cooke@teercoatings.co.uk).

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0257-8972(93)90248-M10.1016/0257-8972(93)90248-M ↗
2. HENDERSON P. S. · Surf Coat. Technol · 2003 · 174
3. MATTOX D. M.: in ‘Deposition technologies for films and coatings’, (ed. Bunshah R. F et al.), 244—287; 1982, New Jersey, Noyes.
4. COOKE K. E. · Surf Coat. Technol · 2004 · 177
5. 10.1116/1.141094910.1116/1.1410949 ↗
6. 10.1016/0257-8972(93)90096-710.1016/0257-8972(93)90096-7 ↗
7. 10.1016/0257-8972(93)90236-H10.1016/0257-8972(93)90236-H ↗
8. 10.1016/S0042-207X(99)00189-X10.1016/S0042-207X(99)00189-X ↗
9. TEER D. G. · US Patent 5,556,519 · 1996
10. 10.1016/S0257-8972(98)00790-710.1016/S0257-8972(98)00790-7 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0257-8972(98)00566-010.1016/S0257-8972(98)00566-0 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01258-010.1016/S0257-8972(01)01258-0 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00634-910.1016/S0257-8972(99)00634-9 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00668-010.1016/S0257-8972(02)00668-0 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0925-9635(02)00296-010.1016/S0925-9635(02)00296-0 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01154-910.1016/S0257-8972(01)01154-9 ↗
17. CARTER D., WALDE H., MCDONOUGH G., and ROCHE G.: Proc. 45th ‘Annual technical conr, 570–577; 2002, Society of Vacuum Coaters, Orlando, FL, USA.
18. Advanced Energies Inc. PinnacleTM Plus user manual’; April 2000, Advanced Energies Industries, Inc., Fort Collins, CO, USA.
19. 10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00990-710.1016/S0257-8972(00)00990-7 ↗
20. 10.1088/0963-0252/11/2/30710.1088/0963-0252/11/2/307 ↗