Anti-asphalt properties of PPS/PTFE composite coatings at high temperature
Source abstract
Abstract
During the process of preparing coal tar pitch and petroleum asphalt, it is technically difficult to remove adhered asphalt through heating, chemical solvents, mechanical methods, etc. In this paper, polyphenylene sulphide/polytetrafluoroethylene (PPS/PTFE) composite coatings were fabricated on stainless steel specimens to study the adhesion of asphalt. Specimens were immersed in hot asphalt and taken out to calculate the coverage area, which was set as the standard for measuring the anti-asphalt properties. Moreover, the surfaces of the PPS/PTFE composite coatings were investigated by means of scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and energy-dispersive system (EDS). As the FT-IR and EDS results reveal, the PPS generated a severely oxidative reaction, and the PTFE macromolecule chain shifted gradually from the coating's interior to the surface. The PPS/40%PTFE coating exhibited the most adequate performance, which showed the best anti-asphalt behaviour, high temperature performance and strong adherence behaviours.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tribology and Wear Analysis · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ef000180y10.1021/ef000180y ↗
2. 10.1021/ef070089v10.1021/ef070089v ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b0116710.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01167 ↗
4. Ojeyemi MO · International Journal of Pavement Engineering · 2017 · 1 · 1
5. 10.1139/cjce-2016-038310.1139/cjce-2016-0383 ↗
6. 10.1021/ef301239h10.1021/ef301239h ↗
7. 10.3390/app702015610.3390/app7020156 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.18610.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.186 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.13710.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.137 ↗
10. 10.1134/1.140415510.1134/1.1404155 ↗
11. 10.2118/69672-PA10.2118/69672-PA ↗
12. Kulkarni M · J Test Eval · 2003 · 31 · 42910.1520/JTE12370J ↗
13. 10.1166/jnn.2012.658510.1166/jnn.2012.6585 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.04.04910.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.04.049 ↗
15. 10.1007/s00396-016-3914-710.1007/s00396-016-3914-7 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11249-016-0777-510.1007/s11249-016-0777-5 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.09.00110.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.09.001 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10965-014-0447-y10.1007/s10965-014-0447-y ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.33310.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.333 ↗
20. 10.1080/10402004.2013.86156710.1080/10402004.2013.861567 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.486837710.1063/1.4868377 ↗
22. Wu KH · Journal of University of Science & Technology Beijing · 2010 · 32 · 1321
23. Wu KH · Acta Materiae Compos Sinica · 2010 · 27 · 47
24. Ensley EK. · J Appl Chem Biotechnol · 1975 · 25 · 61110.1002/jctb.5020250906 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000086610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000866 ↗
26. 10.1080/15440478.2017.136920710.1080/15440478.2017.1369207 ↗