Inverse method of eigenstrain determination of laser shock peening
Source abstract
Abstract
The determination of eigenstrain from residual stress is a crucial aspect in process predicting and optimizing of laser peen forming. However, direct measurement of eigenstrain is not possible, and therefore an indirect method based on the Fredholm integral equation is proposed for determining eigenstrain from residual stress. The residual stress of full-coverage laser shock peening (LSP) is analyzed, and the governing equation of eigenstrain is derived from the elastic deformation of a linear elastic plate under full-coverage LSP. The governing equation is a second-kind Fredholm integral equation, which can be solved analytically using the weight function method. Since residual stress is difficult to measure accurately in LSP, an inverse method based on the integral governing equation is proposed for determining eigenstrain from an incomplete set of measurements. The validity of this method is demonstrated through simulation and experimental results, highlighting its high efficiency and engineering application value.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Energetic Materials and Combustion · Erosion and Abrasive Machining
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Ji Hua Laboratory, Foshan, China
Funding
Youth Innovation Fund of Ji Hua Laboratory · Development of Interconnection Platform of Continuous scale Preparation and In-situ Characterization of Electron Microscope Samples
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2023.11030110.1016/j.optlastec.2023.110301 ↗
2. Digonta HDA · Theor Appl Fract Mech · 104281
3. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.11785110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117851 ↗
4. Askar’yan G · Sov J Exp Theor Phys · 1963 · 16 · 1638
5. 10.1002/adem.20220145110.1002/adem.202201451 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0267727310.1007/BF02677273 ↗
7. 10.1002/adem.20200121610.1002/adem.202001216 ↗
8. 10.1007/s40516-019-00098-810.1007/s40516-019-00098-8 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11665-022-06857-710.1007/s11665-022-06857-7 ↗
10. 10.3390/met1206103410.3390/met12061034 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jma.2023.04.00410.1016/j.jma.2023.04.004 ↗
12. 10.1115/1.164587810.1115/1.1645878 ↗
13. 10.1007/s00170-022-10064-y10.1007/s00170-022-10064-y ↗
14. 10.1088/0022-3727/45/33/33530410.1088/0022-3727/45/33/335304 ↗
15. 10.1051/epjap:200303710.1051/epjap:2003037 ↗
16. 10.1115/1.400258510.1115/1.4002585 ↗
17. 10.1121/1.38953610.1121/1.389536 ↗
18. Ueda Y · Trans Jwri · 2013 · 21 · 123
19. 10.1063/1.34678310.1063/1.346783 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.11.02710.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.11.027 ↗
21. 10.1115/1.404091410.1115/1.4040914 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.01.05010.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.01.050 ↗
23. Ueda Y · Trans JWRI · 1989 · 18 · 135
24. 10.1137/014403510.1137/0144035 ↗
25. Ueda Y · Trans JWRI · 1991 · 20 · 265
26. 10.1243/03093247JSA14110.1243/03093247JSA141 ↗
27. 10.1243/03093247JSA41710.1243/03093247JSA417 ↗
28. Hu Y · 2017
29. Yang R. Inverse eigenstrain determination for geometry prediction of integral panel by laser peen forming . Degree of Master, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2017.
30. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.11658810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116588 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.11.03710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.11.037 ↗
32. 10.1007/s11340-010-9346-210.1007/s11340-010-9346-2 ↗
33. 10.1007/s12540-023-01517-410.1007/s12540-023-01517-4 ↗
34. 10.1007/s00158-023-03544-610.1007/s00158-023-03544-6 ↗
35. Hochstadt H · 2011
36. 10.1201/978142001055810.1201/9781420010558 ↗