journal article·2018-12

Effect of the shot peening on the deformation of Al alloy component

Xiaodi Zhang, Kai Liao, Vincent Ji, Hui Chen, Lei Hu

Surface Engineering· Volume 34· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

The surface of Al-based alloy thin-walled component is treated by the shot peening (SP). After the SP, structure deformation and recovery can be observed due to natural aging, which causes the structural instability of component. In this study, the effect of SP on the recovery is investigated with residual stress evolution, surface microhardness and surface roughness. The influence of SP coverage percentage has been studied. The recovery level is associated with the shot coverage percentage, and the recovery ratio of components is up to 25% after the 100% coverage and down to 3% after the 400% coverage. The study shows the coverage percentage is a crucial parameter that makes the surface of materials get adequate plastic deformation and the grain refining. The experiments find that the multiple coverage percentages can improve the surface microhardness and resist plastic deformation, and guarantee the shape stability of the components.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Erosion and Abrasive Machining · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

SMEE, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, People's Republic of China

SP2M/ICMMO, UMR 8182, Université Paris-Sud 11, Orsay, France

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Aid Program for Science and Technology Innovative Research Team in Higher Educational Institutions of Hunan Province · Scientific Research Fund of CSUFT · National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN)

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/02670836.2016.124227110.1080/02670836.2016.1242271 ↗
2. 10.1080/02670844.2016.126611810.1080/02670844.2016.1266118 ↗
3. 10.1080/02670836.2015.112159810.1080/02670836.2015.1121598 ↗
4. 10.1080/10402004.2015.112131310.1080/10402004.2015.1121313 ↗
5. 10.1179/1743284715Y.000000005710.1179/1743284715Y.0000000057 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12206-016-0635-210.1007/s12206-016-0635-2 ↗
7. 10.1080/02670844.2017.127883810.1080/02670844.2017.1278838 ↗
8. 10.1080/10408436.2015.107671610.1080/10408436.2015.1076716 ↗
9. Zhang H · Surf Eng
10. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.852.17110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.852.171 ↗
11. 10.1080/02670844.2016.119451310.1080/02670844.2016.1194513 ↗
12. Zhang W · Mater Res Innov · 2016 · 19 · 541
13. 10.1080/02670844.2016.119233610.1080/02670844.2016.1192336 ↗
14. 10.1080/02670844.2016.127453610.1080/02670844.2016.1274536 ↗
15. 10.1080/02670844.2016.120408710.1080/02670844.2016.1204087 ↗
16. Xu C · Sci Technol Weld Join
17. 10.1177/095440541557370410.1177/0954405415573704 ↗
18. Zeng D · Tribol Trans.
19. 10.4149/km_2015_4_23910.4149/km_2015_4_239 ↗
20. 10.12913/22998624/5908610.12913/22998624/59086 ↗
21. 10.1080/08940886.2017.131612310.1080/08940886.2017.1316123 ↗
22. HB/Z 26–2011, Shot blasting strengthening technology for aviation parts (Chinese standard).
23. Test Method for Residual Stress analysis by X-ray Diffraction, European standard EN15305, April, 2009.
24. 10.1080/02670836.2017.131824310.1080/02670836.2017.1318243 ↗
25. 10.1179/1743294415Y.000000002810.1179/1743294415Y.0000000028 ↗
26. 10.1080/10402004.2013.81276110.1080/10402004.2013.812761 ↗
27. Zanini A. · Sur Eff Cont Mech XI · 2013 · 78 · 279
28. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.09310.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.093 ↗
29. 10.1080/02670836.2016.124333510.1080/02670836.2016.1243335 ↗