Effect of the shot peening on the deformation of Al alloy component
Source abstract
Abstract
The surface of Al-based alloy thin-walled component is treated by the shot peening (SP). After the SP, structure deformation and recovery can be observed due to natural aging, which causes the structural instability of component. In this study, the effect of SP on the recovery is investigated with residual stress evolution, surface microhardness and surface roughness. The influence of SP coverage percentage has been studied. The recovery level is associated with the shot coverage percentage, and the recovery ratio of components is up to 25% after the 100% coverage and down to 3% after the 400% coverage. The study shows the coverage percentage is a crucial parameter that makes the surface of materials get adequate plastic deformation and the grain refining. The experiments find that the multiple coverage percentages can improve the surface microhardness and resist plastic deformation, and guarantee the shape stability of the components.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · Erosion and Abrasive Machining · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
SMEE, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, People's Republic of China
SP2M/ICMMO, UMR 8182, Université Paris-Sud 11, Orsay, France
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Aid Program for Science and Technology Innovative Research Team in Higher Educational Institutions of Hunan Province · Scientific Research Fund of CSUFT · National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN)
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/02670836.2016.124227110.1080/02670836.2016.1242271 ↗
2. 10.1080/02670844.2016.126611810.1080/02670844.2016.1266118 ↗
3. 10.1080/02670836.2015.112159810.1080/02670836.2015.1121598 ↗
4. 10.1080/10402004.2015.112131310.1080/10402004.2015.1121313 ↗
5. 10.1179/1743284715Y.000000005710.1179/1743284715Y.0000000057 ↗
6. 10.1007/s12206-016-0635-210.1007/s12206-016-0635-2 ↗
7. 10.1080/02670844.2017.127883810.1080/02670844.2017.1278838 ↗
8. 10.1080/10408436.2015.107671610.1080/10408436.2015.1076716 ↗
9. Zhang H · Surf Eng
10. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.852.17110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.852.171 ↗
11. 10.1080/02670844.2016.119451310.1080/02670844.2016.1194513 ↗
12. Zhang W · Mater Res Innov · 2016 · 19 · 541
13. 10.1080/02670844.2016.119233610.1080/02670844.2016.1192336 ↗
14. 10.1080/02670844.2016.127453610.1080/02670844.2016.1274536 ↗
15. 10.1080/02670844.2016.120408710.1080/02670844.2016.1204087 ↗
16. Xu C · Sci Technol Weld Join
17. 10.1177/095440541557370410.1177/0954405415573704 ↗
18. Zeng D · Tribol Trans.
19. 10.4149/km_2015_4_23910.4149/km_2015_4_239 ↗
20. 10.12913/22998624/5908610.12913/22998624/59086 ↗
21. 10.1080/08940886.2017.131612310.1080/08940886.2017.1316123 ↗
22. HB/Z 26–2011, Shot blasting strengthening technology for aviation parts (Chinese standard).
23. Test Method for Residual Stress analysis by X-ray Diffraction, European standard EN15305, April, 2009.
24. 10.1080/02670836.2017.131824310.1080/02670836.2017.1318243 ↗
25. 10.1179/1743294415Y.000000002810.1179/1743294415Y.0000000028 ↗
26. 10.1080/10402004.2013.81276110.1080/10402004.2013.812761 ↗
27. Zanini A. · Sur Eff Cont Mech XI · 2013 · 78 · 279
28. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.09310.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.093 ↗
29. 10.1080/02670836.2016.124333510.1080/02670836.2016.1243335 ↗