journal article·2024-04Open access

Optimization of chemistry and process parameters for control of intermetallic formation in Mg sludges

Y. Fu, G.G. Wang, A. Hu, Y. Li, K.B. Thacker, J.P. Weiler, H. Hu

Journal of Magnesium and Alloys· Volume 12· Issue 4

Abstract

Intermetallic formation in sludge during magnesium (Mg) melting, holding and high pressure die casting practices is a very important issue. But, very often it is overlooked by academia, original equipment manufacturers (OEM), metal ingot producers and even die casters. The aim of this study was to minimize the intermetallic formation in Mg sludge via the optimization of the chemistry and process parameters. The Al8Mn5 intermetallic particles were identified by the microstructure analysis based on the Al and Mn ratio. The design of experiment (DOE) technique, Taguchi method, was employed to minimize the intermetallic formation in the sludge of Mg alloys with various chemical compositions of Al, Mn, Fe, and different process parameters, holding temperature and holding time. The sludge yield (SY) and intermetallic size (IS) was selected as two responses. The optimum combination of the levels in terms of minimizing the intermetallic formation were 9 wt.% Al, 0.15 wt.%Mn, 0.001 wt.% (10 ppm) Fe, 690 °C for the holding temperature and holding at 30 mins for the holding time, respectively. The best combination for smallest intermetallic size were 9 wt.% Al, 0.15 wt.%Mn, 0.001 wt.% (10 ppm) Fe, 630 °C for the holding temperature and holding at 60 mins for the holding time, respectively. Three groups of sludge factors, Chemical Sludge (CSF), Physical Sludge (PSF) and Comprehensive Sludge Factors (and CPSF) were established for prediction of sludge yields and intermetallic sizes in Al-containing Mg alloys. The CPSF with five independent variables including both chemical elements and process parameters gave high accuracy in prediction, as the prediction of the PSF with only the two processing parameters of the melt holding temperature and time showed a relatively large deviation from the experimental data. The Chemical Sludge Factor was primarily designed for small ingot producers and die casters with a limited melting and holding capacity, of which process parameters could be fixed easily. The Physical Sludge Factor could be used for mass production with a single type of Mg alloy, in which the chemistry fluctuation might be negligible. In large Mg casting suppliers with multiple melting and holding furnaces and a number of Mg alloys in production, the Comprehensive Sludge Factor should be implemented to diminish the sludge formation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Peng · JOM · 2019 · 71 · 223510.1007/s11837-019-03471-2 ↗
2. Zeng · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 153 · 36410.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.032 ↗
3. Fu · J. Magnes. Alloys · 2022 · 10 · 59910.1016/j.jma.2021.11.031 ↗
4. Thorvaldsen · 1991 · 413
5. Holta · 1997 · 75
6. Holta · 1994
7. Corby · Magnes. Technol. · 2004 · 209
8. Ye · J. Alloys Compd. · 2006 · 419 · 5410.1016/j.jallcom.2005.08.111 ↗
9. Sin · Int. Mater. Rev. · 2013 · 58 · 41910.1179/1743280413Y.0000000017 ↗
10. Tartaglia · JOM · 2001 · 53 · 1610.1007/s11837-001-0187-4 ↗
11. Hu · JOM · 1996 · 48 · 4710.1007/BF03223103 ↗
12. Haerle · Light Met. Age · 1996 · 54 · 22
13. Paradis · Int. J. Met. Cast. · 2018 · 12 · 2
14. Bakke · NADCA Trans. · 2001
15. Bakke · J. Mater. Manuf. · 1997 · 106 · 314
16. Bronfin · 2002 · 55
17. Bronfin · Met. Sci. Heat Treat., · 2006 · 48 · 47910.1007/s11041-006-0121-z ↗
18. Jorstad · Die Cast. Eng. · 1986 · 30 · 1
19. Groteke · Die Cast. Eng. · 1985 · 5 · 16
20. Shabestari · Cast Met. · 1994 · 6 · 21710.1080/09534962.1994.11819153 ↗
21. Flores · 1991 · 293
22. Makhlouf · 2002
23. Beygi · Metals · 2023 · 13 · 76810.3390/met13040768 ↗
24. Beygi · J. Manuf. Process. · 2021 · 70 · 15210.1016/j.jmapro.2021.08.049 ↗
25. Pouraliakbar · Mater. Lett. · 2024 · 35510.1016/j.matlet.2023.135548 ↗
26. Ghorbanzadeh · J. Alloys Compd. · 2023 · 96910.1016/j.jallcom.2023.172477 ↗
27. Taguchi · 1986
28. Sun · J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2008 · 199 · 25610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.08.036 ↗
29. Chihara · 2019 · 297