journal article·2026-04Open access

A new perspective on tensile yield plateau formation in extruded Mg-4.83Gd-2.36Nd-0.21Zr alloy

Chunhui Wang, Guangyu Yang, Zhiyong Kan, Wanqi Jie

Abstract

The occurrence of the tensile yield plateau in Mg alloys is relatively rare and its underlying reasons have been controversial. In this study, we systematically investigated the deformation mechanism of an extruded Mg-4.83Gd-2.36Nd-0.21Zr alloy, which exhibited an obvious tensile yield plateau. Quasi-in-situ EBSD analysis revealed that basal slip was the predominant mechanism in the tensile yield stage, which was attributed to the weak rare earth texture that facilitated basal slip activation and the fine recrystallized grains that suppressed twinning. The yield drop resulted from the combined effects of the easy activation of basal slip and the dislocation pinning by solute atoms. Additionally, the random distribution of grain orientations, high grain boundary misorientation angles (GBMA), and small grain sizes hindered intergranular deformation transfer between neighboring grains. The weak deformation transfer contributed to the formation of yield point elongation. This work underscores the role of texture, grain orientations, and GBMA in determining the yield plateau, offering a new perspective on yield plateau formation in Mg alloys.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Bai · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2023 · 11 · 360910.1016/j.jma.2023.09.015 ↗
2. Nie · MMTA · 2012 · 43 · 389110.1007/s11661-012-1217-2 ↗
3. Zeng · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2022 · 10 · 151110.1016/j.jma.2022.03.001 ↗
4. Drozdenko · Mater. Lett. · 2023 · 33010.1016/j.matlet.2022.133315 ↗
5. Li · Mater. Lett. · 2022 · 324
6. Zhang · Acta Mater · 2016 · 120 · 7510.1016/j.actamat.2016.08.037 ↗
7. Li · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2020 · 787
8. Wang · Acta Mater · 2017 · 124 · 1710.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.069 ↗
9. Liu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2024 · 90110.1016/j.msea.2024.146553 ↗
10. Varanasi · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2021 · 82410.1016/j.msea.2021.141816 ↗
11. Wang · Materialia · 2021 · 15
12. Bi · J. Rare Earths · 2023 · 41 · 45410.1016/j.jre.2022.01.011 ↗
13. Barnett · Acta Mater. · 2004 · 52 · 509310.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.015 ↗
14. Wang · Scr. Mater. · 2019 · 160 · 510.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.09.023 ↗
15. Barnett · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 143310.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.022 ↗
16. Brindley · Metall. Rev. · 1970 · 15 · 10110.1179/imr.1970.15.1.101 ↗
17. Hu · Materialia · 2021 · 20
18. Zhang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2021 · 824
19. Tsuchida · Scr. Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 5710.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.09.011 ↗
20. Li · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2024 · 12 · 377210.1016/j.jma.2023.03.002 ↗
21. Li · Scr. Mater. · 2021 · 193 · 14210.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.10.052 ↗
22. Li · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2021 · 818
23. Luo · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 183 · 39810.1016/j.actamat.2019.11.034 ↗
24. Luo · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2025 · 226 · 29010.1016/j.jmst.2024.12.008 ↗
25. Woo · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2022 · 10 · 14610.1016/j.jma.2021.07.003 ↗
26. Zheng · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2024 · 172 · 16610.1016/j.jmst.2023.06.055 ↗
27. Wang · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2022 · 20 · 277110.1016/j.jmrt.2022.08.069 ↗
28. Wang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2017 · 689 · 39510.1016/j.msea.2017.02.067 ↗
29. Wu · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 42 · 17510.1016/j.jmst.2019.10.010 ↗
30. Luo · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 849
31. Cepeda-Jiménez · Acta Mater. · 2015 · 88 · 23210.1016/j.actamat.2015.01.032 ↗
32. Chen · Int. J. Plast. · 2023 · 170
33. Sun · Int. J. Plast. · 2019 · 123 · 12110.1016/j.ijplas.2019.07.014 ↗
34. Wang · Phys. Status Solidi A · 2023 · 22010.1002/pssa.202300434 ↗
35. Fan · Scr. Mater. · 2016 · 112 · 5010.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.09.008 ↗
36. Barnett · Scripta Mater. · 2008 · 59 · 69610.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.05.027 ↗
37. Zheng · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 198 · 3510.1016/j.actamat.2020.07.055 ↗
38. Chandiran · J. Alloys Compd. · 2023 · 93010.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167443 ↗
39. Sun · Acta Mater. · 2019 · 178 · 1010.1016/j.actamat.2019.07.043 ↗
40. Shi · Acta Mater. · 2023 · 24410.1016/j.actamat.2022.118555 ↗
41. Hu · Scr. Mater. · 2014 · 78–79 · 2510.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.01.020 ↗
42. Zheng · Eng. Failure Anal. · 2024 · 163
43. Ni · Int. J. Plast. · 2024 · 18210.1016/j.ijplas.2024.104119 ↗
44. Kan · J. Alloys Compd. · 2024 · 98910.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174291 ↗
45. Luster · MMTA · 1995 · 26 · 174510.1007/BF02670762 ↗
46. Yu · Acta Mater. · 2017 · 128 · 31310.1016/j.actamat.2017.02.044 ↗
47. Sperry · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 193 · 22910.1016/j.actamat.2020.04.037 ↗
48. Bieler · Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 18 · 21210.1016/j.cossms.2014.05.003 ↗
49. Zhao · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2022 · 10 · 168010.1016/j.jma.2022.03.002 ↗
50. Xu · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2022 · 99 · 25110.1016/j.jmst.2021.04.076 ↗
51. Guan · Acta Mater. · 2019 · 173 · 14210.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.016 ↗
52. Herrera-Solaz · Mater. Lett. · 2014 · 128 · 19910.1016/j.matlet.2014.04.144 ↗
53. Xin · Mater. Des. · 2015 · 86 · 65610.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.130 ↗
54. Huang · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2022 · 109 · 3010.1016/j.jmst.2021.07.051 ↗
55. Xu · J. Alloys Compd. · 2014 · 610 · 28810.1016/j.jallcom.2014.05.037 ↗
56. Sarebanzadeh · Acta Mater. · 2023 · 24310.1016/j.actamat.2022.118536 ↗
57. Wang · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2022 · 10 · 178610.1016/j.jma.2022.06.015 ↗