Laser surface texturing of dies in strip drawing of DP600 steel sheet
Source abstract
Abstract
Friction at the blank-die contact influences material flow, formability, and product surface quality in processes like deep drawing. Surface modification of the dies by laser texturing is a potential technique to alter the tribological characteristics at the interface during sliding of the sheet over the die surface in lubricated condition. In this work, the effect of laser surface texturing of dies has been investigated under high normal loads during strip drawing of dual phase (DP600) steel. The effect of texture parameters and process parameters on the interface friction between the strip and the dies has been studied. It has been found that the friction coefficient reduced, and the surface finish improved significantly with the textured dies when compared to the conventional die. This study emphasises the importance of surface modification of the dies by laser texturing for its potential application in sheet metal forming processes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tribology and Lubrication Engineering · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India
Centre for Innovation in Mobility, Research and Development, Tata Steel Ltd, Chennai, India
Research & Development, Tata Steel Limited, Jamshedpur, India
Funding
Ministry of Education, India · IIT Delhi · Tata Steel R&D, Jamshedpur
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00170-017-0401-310.1007/s00170-017-0401-3 ↗
2. 10.1080/02670844.2020.182157210.1080/02670844.2020.1821572 ↗
3. 10.1177/135065011140604510.1177/1350650111406045 ↗
4. 10.1080/02670844.2020.174246910.1080/02670844.2020.1742469 ↗
5. Merklein M · Dry Metal Forming · 2015 · 1 · 42
6. 10.1080/02670844.2021.195204110.1080/02670844.2021.1952041 ↗
7. 10.1179/1743294414Y.000000024710.1179/1743294414Y.0000000247 ↗
8. 10.3762/bjnano.9.23810.3762/bjnano.9.238 ↗
9. 10.1080/1040200100372888910.1080/10402001003728889 ↗
10. 10.1080/0569819049044090210.1080/05698190490440902 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.12.06810.1016/j.apsusc.2012.12.068 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.11.04110.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.11.041 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.171510410.1115/1.1715104 ↗
14. 10.1179/1743294414Y.000000029310.1179/1743294414Y.0000000293 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.triboint.2007.01.01410.1016/j.triboint.2007.01.014 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.triboint.2011.01.00310.1016/j.triboint.2011.01.003 ↗
17. ASTM G115. Standard guide for measuring and reporting friction coefficients 1.
18. Merklein M, Zoeller F, Sturm V. Experimental and numerical investigations on frictional behaviour under consideration of varying tribological conditions. Adv Mat Res Trans Tech Publications Ltd; 2014. p. 270–278.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.966-967.270 ↗
19. 10.1080/10402004.2019.158602310.1080/10402004.2019.1586023 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.bsbt.2016.05.00210.1016/j.bsbt.2016.05.002 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11249-009-9497-410.1007/s11249-009-9497-4 ↗
22. Zabala A · Metals (Basel) · 2021 · 11
23. 10.1115/1.182807010.1115/1.1828070 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.08.00110.1016/j.ijmachtools.2010.08.001 ↗
25. Shisode M · J Mater Process Technol · 2021 · 291
26. 10.21741/9781644902479-22610.21741/9781644902479-226 ↗