Substitution of Ni for Zn on microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg–Gd–Y–Zn–Mn alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
This study analyzes the effect of substitution of Ni for Zn on microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg–Gd–Y–Zn–Mn alloy. Our results show that the volume fraction of Mg5(Gd, Y) and (Mg, Zn)3RE phase decreased and LPSO phase increased with more substitution of Ni. After homogenization, only α-Mg and LPSO phase existed. In Mg–Gd–Y–Zn–Mn alloys, the LPSO phases mainly consisted of the 14H type. While in Mg–Gd–Y–Ni–Mn alloy, the LPSO phases consisted of the 18R type. In addition, compared with Mg–Gd–Y–Zn–Mn alloy, the mechanical properties of as-extruded Ni-substitution alloys were improved due to the better refinement of the size of grains and LPSO phases. The tensile strength in as-extruded Mg–Gd–Y–Ni–Mn alloy could reach up to 400 MPa with 18% of the elongation to failure. Keywords: Magnesium alloy, Substitution, Microstructure, Mechanical property, LPSO phase
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Leng · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2012 · 540 · 3810.1016/j.msea.2012.01.057 ↗
2. Wang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2010 · 528 · 32310.1016/j.msea.2010.09.004 ↗
3. Wang · J. Alloys Compd · 2012 · 537 · 110.1016/j.jallcom.2012.05.003 ↗
4. John Neil · Int. J. Plasticity · 2009 · 25 · 37910.1016/j.ijplas.2008.05.003 ↗
5. Wang · Int. J. Plasticity · 2013 · 49 · 3610.1016/j.ijplas.2013.02.016 ↗
6. Kawamura · Mater. Transact · 2001 · 42 · 117210.2320/matertrans.42.1172 ↗
7. Itoi · Scr. Mater · 2004 · 51 · 10710.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.04.003 ↗
8. Zhu · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 293610.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.022 ↗
9. Homma · Scr. Mater · 2009 · 61 · 64410.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.06.003 ↗
10. Xu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2012 · 547 · 9310.1016/j.msea.2012.03.087 ↗
11. Wen · J. Magnes. Alloys · 2015 · 3 · 2310.1016/j.jma.2014.12.003 ↗
12. Bi · J. Magnes. Alloys · 2015 · 3 · 6310.1016/j.jma.2014.12.006 ↗
13. Xu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2015 · 643 · 13710.1016/j.msea.2015.07.032 ↗
14. Wang · Mater. Lett · 2013 · 93 · 41510.1016/j.matlet.2012.11.076 ↗
15. Yamasaki · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 679810.1016/j.actamat.2007.08.033 ↗
16. Matsuda · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2004 · 386 · 44710.1016/S0921-5093(04)01017-2 ↗
17. Matsuda · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2005 · 393 · 26910.1016/j.msea.2004.10.040 ↗
18. Zhang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2013 · 585 · 26810.1016/j.msea.2013.07.049 ↗
19. Mezbahul-Islam · Calphad · 2009 · 33 · 47810.1016/j.calphad.2009.01.001 ↗
20. González · Mater. Charact · 2012 · 64 · 5310.1016/j.matchar.2011.12.001 ↗
21. Itoi · Scr. Mater · 2008 · 59 · 115510.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.08.001 ↗
22. Liu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2013 · 585 · 38710.1016/j.msea.2013.07.036 ↗
23. Wang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2014 · 618 · 35510.1016/j.msea.2014.09.015 ↗
24. Yoshimoto · Mater. Transact · 2006 · 47 · 95910.2320/matertrans.47.959 ↗
25. Itoi · Mater. Transact · 2010 · 51 · 153610.2320/matertrans.L-M2010816 ↗
26. Itoi · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2013 · 560 · 21610.1016/j.msea.2012.09.059 ↗
27. Honma · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2005 · 395 · 30110.1016/j.msea.2004.12.035 ↗
28. Nishijima · Mater. Transact · 2006 · 47 · 210910.2320/matertrans.47.2109 ↗
29. Nodooshan · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2014 · 615 · 7910.1016/j.msea.2014.07.056 ↗
30. Kishida · Acta Mater · 2015 · 99 · 22810.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.004 ↗
31. Tane · Acta Mater · 2015 · 96 · 17010.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.005 ↗
32. Gröbner · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 594810.1016/j.actamat.2012.05.035 ↗
33. Saal · Scr. Mater · 2012 · 67 · 79810.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.07.013 ↗
34. Gao · Scr. Mater · 2008 · 58 · 61910.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.11.022 ↗
35. Okuda · Scr. Mater · 2014 · 75 · 6610.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.11.021 ↗