journal article·2025-08Open access

Statistical investigation on the tension-compression asymmetry of slip behavior and plastic heterogeneity in an aged Mg-10Y sheet

Ran Ni, Huashen Liu, Shen Hua, Hao Zhou, Ying Zeng, Dongdi Yin

Journal of Magnesium and Alloys· Volume 13· Issue 8

Abstract

• The T-C asymmetric slip behavior was statistically studied in an aged Mg-10Y sheet. • The estimated compression CRSS pyr II /CRSS bas was ∼3 times larger than that for tension. • Pyramidal II 〈 c + a 〉 slip was more active when slip plane was under tension. • The activity of multiple slip, cross slip and slip transfer, as well as the GND density were also T-C asymmetric. The grain-scale tension-compression (T-C) asymmetric slip behavior and geometrically necessary dislocation (GND) density in an aged and twin-free Mg-10Y sheet were statistically studied using slip trace analysis and electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis. A significantly asymmetric slip activity, i.e., higher tensile slip activity and proportion of non-basal slip, was manifested. Prismatic 〈a〉 (37.1%) and basal 〈a〉 (27.6%) slips dominated the tensile deformation, followed by pyramidal II 〈 c + a 〉 slip (20.0%). While during compression, basal 〈a〉 slip (61.9%) was the most active slip mode, and only 6.9% pyramidal II 〈 c + a 〉 slip was observed. The critical resolved shear stress (CRSS) ratio was estimated based on ∼800 sets of the identified slip traces, which suggested that the CRSS pyr II /CRSS bas for compression was ∼3 times than that of tension. The pyramidal II 〈 c + a 〉 slip was more active when the slip plane was under tension than under compression, which was consistent with the calculated asymmetric CRSS pyr II /CRSS bas . The activity of multiple slip, cross slip and slip transfer, as well as the GND density were also T-C asymmetric. This work thoughtfully demonstrated the T-C asymmetric slip behavior and plastic heterogeneity in Mg alloys which was believed to be responsible for the macroscopic T-C asymmetry when twinning was absent. The present statistical results are valuable for validating and/or facilitating crystal plasticity simulations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. Yang · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2022 · 10 · 19510.1016/j.jma.2020.08.021 ↗
2. Xie · Mater. Res. Lett. · 2023 · 11 · 37410.1080/21663831.2022.2158048 ↗
3. Wang · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2024 · 12 · 404510.1016/j.jma.2024.07.009 ↗
4. Zhu · Nat. Commun. · 2022 · 13 · 583810.1038/s41467-022-33480-w ↗
5. Jiang · Acta Metall. Sin. -Engl. Lett. · 2024 · 37 · 130110.1007/s40195-024-01706-z ↗
6. Robson · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2014 · 45 · 522610.1007/s11661-014-2453-4 ↗
7. Yin · Int. J. Plast. · 2021 · 13610.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102878 ↗
8. Liu · Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China · 2014 · 24 · 91510.1016/S1003-6326(14)63143-5 ↗
9. Yang · Acta Mater · 2023 · 24810.1016/j.actamat.2023.118766 ↗
10. Barnett · JOM · 2009 · 61 · 1910.1007/s11837-009-0115-6 ↗
11. Park · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2014 · 617 · 27710.1016/j.jallcom.2014.07.164 ↗
12. Hidalgo-Manrique · Acta Mater · 2017 · 124 · 45610.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.019 ↗
13. Cepeda-Jiménez · Acta Mater · 2018 · 145 · 26410.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.021 ↗
14. Wang · Acta Mater · 2018 · 146 · 1210.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.025 ↗
15. Vasilev · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2020 · 51 · 385810.1007/s11661-020-05841-x ↗
16. Davis · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2019 · 744 · 52510.1016/j.msea.2018.12.060 ↗
17. Bohlen · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2010 · 527 · 709210.1016/j.msea.2010.07.081 ↗
18. Xiao · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2021 · 801
19. Lu · J. Mater. Sci. · 2016 · 51 · 1046410.1007/s10853-016-0266-0 ↗
20. Li · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2024
21. Oyinbo · Nanotechnol. Rev. · 2024 · 13 · 22310.1515/ntrev-2024-0082 ↗
22. Singhaneka · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2023 · 23010.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112458 ↗
23. Ganesan · Int. J. Plast. · 2021 · 13710.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102917 ↗
24. Bhattacharyya · Acta Mater · 2018 · 146 · 5510.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.043 ↗
25. Ni · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2022 · 53 · 53510.1007/s11661-021-06523-y ↗
26. Yang · Acta Mater · 2024 · 27810.1016/j.actamat.2024.120231 ↗
27. Hestroffer · Acta Mater · 2022 · 22610.1016/j.actamat.2022.117627 ↗
28. Kawano · Int. J. Plast. · 2020 · 12710.1016/j.ijplas.2019.12.001 ↗
29. Di Gioacchino · Int. J. Plast. · 2015 · 74 · 9210.1016/j.ijplas.2015.05.012 ↗
30. Kamaya · Mater. Charact. · 2012 · 66 · 5610.1016/j.matchar.2012.02.001 ↗
31. Poole · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2021 · 81310.1016/j.msea.2021.141176 ↗
32. Ni · Int. J. Plast. · 2024 · 18210.1016/j.ijplas.2024.104119 ↗
33. Hua · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2021 · 82510.1016/j.msea.2021.141927 ↗
34. Long · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2020 · 51 · 273810.1007/s11661-020-05712-5 ↗
35. Xu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 841
36. Wei · Acta Mater · 2021 · 206
37. Ni · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2021 · 80410.1016/j.msea.2021.140738 ↗
38. Zhao · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2019 · 7 · 67210.1016/j.jma.2019.09.004 ↗
39. Hielscher · J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2019 · 52 · 98410.1107/S1600576719009075 ↗
40. Bachmann · Solid State Phenom · 2010 · 160 · 6310.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.160.63 ↗
41. El-Dasher · Scripta Mater · 2003 · 48 · 14110.1016/S1359-6462(02)00340-8 ↗
42. Deng · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2021 · 52 · 33210.1007/s11661-020-06083-7 ↗
43. Jiang · Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China · 2023 · 33 · 7910.1016/S1003-6326(22)66092-8 ↗
44. Yin · Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China · 2023 · 33 · 297010.1016/S1003-6326(23)66311-3 ↗
45. Imandoust · J. Mater. Sci. · 2017 · 52 · 110.1007/s10853-016-0371-0 ↗
46. Solomon · Mater. Lett. · 2018 · 216 · 6710.1016/j.matlet.2017.12.149 ↗
47. Liu · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 45310.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.044 ↗
48. Nie · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2012 · 43 · 389110.1007/s11661-012-1217-2 ↗
49. Wu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2014 · 593 · 4810.1016/j.msea.2013.11.029 ↗
50. Selvarajou · Acta Mater · 2017 · 127 · 5410.1016/j.actamat.2017.01.015 ↗
51. Wang · Acta Mater · 2018 · 155 · 13810.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.065 ↗
52. Li · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 755510.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.042 ↗
53. Luster · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 1995 · 26 · 174510.1007/BF02670762 ↗
54. Sperry · Acta Mater · 2020 · 193 · 22910.1016/j.actamat.2020.04.037 ↗
55. Muránsky · Acta Mater · 2019 · 175 · 29710.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.036 ↗
56. Albrecht · Phys. Rev. Mater. · 2021 · 5 · 4360210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.043602 ↗
57. Wu · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. · 2016 · 113 · 1113710.1073/pnas.1603966113 ↗
58. Nogaret · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 433210.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.022 ↗
59. Oyinbo · Eng. Sci. · 2023 · 25 · 931
60. Zhang · Mater. Res. Lett. · 2024 · 12 · 44210.1080/21663831.2024.2342511 ↗
61. Wu · Nature · 2015 · 526 · 6210.1038/nature15364 ↗
62. Matsumoto · Scripta Mater · 2024 · 25210.1016/j.scriptamat.2024.116235 ↗
63. Dai · Comput. Mater. Sci. · 2019 · 17010.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109183 ↗
64. Long · Scripta Mater · 2018 · 153 · 9410.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.04.043 ↗
65. Jones · Acta Metall · 1981 · 29 · 95110.1016/0001-6160(81)90049-3 ↗
66. Cai · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 40710.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.020 ↗
67. Hidalgo-Manrique · Acta Mater · 2015 · 92 · 26510.1016/j.actamat.2015.03.053 ↗