Achieving high ductility and strength in magnesium alloy through cryogenic-hot forming
Source abstract
Abstract
Magnesium alloys are the lightest structural alloys and have attracted substantial research attention in the past two decades. However, their mechanical properties, including ductility and strength, are limited after forming due to the formation of coarse grains and strong texture. This study proposes and proves a new cryogenic-hot forming process concept. Cryogenic deformation is imposed before the hot deformation. The effect of the cryogenic step has been compared with a conventional direct hot deformation process. The mechanical properties, microstructure, and texture of both the novel and conventional process routes have been compared. The cryogenic-hot deformed sample exhibits the highest ductility and fracture strength (ultimate tensile strength: 321 MPa, ductility: 21 %) due to effective grain refinement and texture weakening by cryogenically formed twin-twin interaction induced recrystallisation. The proposed cryogenic-hot forming process can be a potential innovative manufacturing method for producing high-performance magnesium components.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Zeng · Int. Mater. Rev. · 2018 · 64 · 2710.1080/09506608.2017.1421439 ↗
2. Zhang · Mater. Des. · 2019 · 184 · 10816010.1016/j.matdes.2019.108160 ↗
3. Pérez-Prado · JOM · 2020 · 72 · 256110.1007/s11837-020-04051-5 ↗
4. Zhang · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2023 · 25 · 745410.1016/j.jmrt.2023.07.139 ↗
5. Liu · Science · 2019 · 365 · 7310.1126/science.aaw2843 ↗
6. Zeng · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 160 · 9710.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.045 ↗
7. Toda-Caraballo · Acta Mater. · 2014 · 75 · 28710.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.064 ↗
8. Wu · Science · 2018 · 359 · 44710.1126/science.aap8716 ↗
9. Zarandi · 2011
10. Pan · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 186 · 27810.1016/j.actamat.2020.01.017 ↗
11. Zhu · Acta Mater. · 2015 · 82 · 34410.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.006 ↗
12. Imandoust · Acta Mater. · 2017 · 138 · 2710.1016/j.actamat.2017.07.038 ↗
13. Huang · Mater. Des. · 2016 · 111 · 54810.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.012 ↗
14. Al-Samman · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 53710.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.013 ↗
15. Bhattacharyya · Acta Mater. · 2015 · 86 · 8010.1016/j.actamat.2014.12.009 ↗
16. Guan · Acta Mater. · 2017 · 135 · 1410.1016/j.actamat.2017.06.015 ↗
17. Peng · Mater. Res. Lett. · 2022 · 10 · 31810.1080/21663831.2022.2050433 ↗
18. Zhang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2020 · 772 · 13868610.1016/j.msea.2019.138686 ↗
19. Ma · Acta Mater. · 2014 · 67 · 10210.1016/j.actamat.2013.12.025 ↗
20. Kim · Scr. Mater. · 2011 · 65 · 110510.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.09.029 ↗
21. Guan · Acta Mater. · 2017 · 126 · 13210.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.058 ↗
22. Zhang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2021 · 807 · 14082110.1016/j.msea.2021.140821 ↗
23. Zhang · Mater. Des. · 2020 · 193
24. Kabirian · Int. J. Plast. · 2015 · 68 · 110.1016/j.ijplas.2014.10.012 ↗
25. Jain · J. Microsc. · 2011 · 242 · 2610.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03434.x ↗
26. Choi · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2018 · 738 · 7510.1016/j.msea.2018.09.091 ↗
27. Yang · Int. J. Plast. · 2022 · 156 · 10334810.1016/j.ijplas.2022.103348 ↗
28. Zhao · Science · 2021 · 373 · 136310.1126/science.abe7252 ↗
29. Han · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 831 · 14218910.1016/j.msea.2021.142189 ↗
30. Che · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 832 · 14247510.1016/j.msea.2021.142475 ↗
31. Park · Scr. Mater. · 2013 · 69 · 25010.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.04.011 ↗
32. Mohamed · Acta Mater. · 2000 · 48 · 329510.1016/S1359-6454(00)00155-5 ↗
33. Bae · Mater. Charact. · 2016 · 112 · 10510.1016/j.matchar.2015.12.009 ↗
34. Calcagnotto · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2010 · 527 · 273810.1016/j.msea.2010.01.004 ↗
35. Yi · Acta Mater. · 2010 · 58 · 59210.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.038 ↗
36. Wang · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 188 · 21510.1016/j.actamat.2020.02.006 ↗
37. Jiang · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 722710.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.027 ↗
38. Su · Philos. Mag. · 2008 · 88 · 18110.1080/14786430701805566 ↗
39. Guan · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 145 · 39910.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.019 ↗
40. Barnett · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2007 · 464 · 810.1016/j.msea.2007.02.109 ↗
41. Zhang · Mater. Des. · 2020 · 194 · 10893610.1016/j.matdes.2020.108936 ↗
42. Barnett · Acta Mater. · 2004 · 52 · 509310.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.015 ↗
43. Jain · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2008 · 486 · 54510.1016/j.msea.2007.09.069 ↗
44. Kumar · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2020 · 771 · 13864410.1016/j.msea.2019.138644 ↗
45. Wei · Acta Mater. · 2021 · 206 · 11660410.1016/j.actamat.2020.116604 ↗