Distribution of residual stress fields in TC6 blade by LSP
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim was to analyse distribution rule of residual stress fields in a TC6 titanium alloy blade with multiple impacts and different spot overlapping ratios by comparing the numerical simulation and laser shock processing (LSP) experiments results. A dynamic model based on the finite element method was presented to simulate multiple impacts and different spot overlapping ratios by single sided LSP with round laser spot, and the distribution rule of residual stress fields based on different process condition was described. Further, LSP experiments of multiple impacts and different spot overlapping ratios were executed to compare the simulation results by measuring and fractographic observation. The results indicated that simulated values were reasonable with experimental values, and the compressive residual stresses were greatly increased and driven deeper below the blade surface with multiple impacts and high spot overlapping ratios on the same spot.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Treatment and Residual Stress · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Erosion and Abrasive Machining
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Air Force Engineering University Xi’ an 710077, China
Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.04.02010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.04.020 ↗
2. Li CG, Fu HZ, Yu Q: ‘Aerospace materials’, 41–55; 2002, Beijing, National Defense Industry Press.
3. 10.1023/A:100669842458810.1023/A:1006698424588 ↗
4. 10.1179/02670840322500756310.1179/026708403225007563 ↗
5. 10.1080/1042691100372076310.1080/10426911003720763 ↗
6. Amarchintal HK · Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2009 · 17 · 1
7. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.01.15010.1016/j.apsusc.2005.01.150 ↗
8. Patrick JG · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2007 · 468 · 15
9. 10.1016/S1006-7191(08)60029-010.1016/S1006-7191(08)60029-0 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.07.00810.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.07.008 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.dental.2008.11.00610.1016/j.dental.2008.11.006 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.03910.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.039 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.10.02010.1016/j.msea.2010.10.020 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.05210.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.052 ↗
15. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.164.42510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.164.425 ↗
16. He WF · J. Aerosp. Power · 2011 · 26 · 1551
17. 10.1016/0921-5093(95)10084-910.1016/0921-5093(95)10084-9 ↗
18. 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-910.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.00910.1016/j.msea.2012.09.009 ↗
20. Xiong AM · Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sinica · 2003 · 24 · 477
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.01710.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.017 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.01010.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.010 ↗