Low-cycle fatigue behavior of solutionized and aged WE43 magnesium alloys at room temperature
Source abstract
Abstract
The low-cycle fatigue behavior of solutionized (T4) and aged (T6) WE43 magnesium alloys was studied at room temperature. The total strain amplitudes (Δεt/2) were 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7% and 1.0%. Detailed microstructure evolution was characterized by scanning electron microscope (SEM), electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The results showed that plastic strain amplitude decreased with the increasing cycle number in T4 alloy, which is due to the dense persistent slip bands (PSBs) and dynamic precipitates hindering 〈a〉 dislocation slip. In contrast, the plastic strain amplitude increases gradually in T6 alloy, which is attributed to the enhanced activation of pyramidal slip. The low-cycle fatigue life of T6 alloy with larger fatigue ductility coefficient is longer than that of T4 alloy. The Coffin-Manson model can accurately predict the fatigue life of T4 and T6 alloys compared to Jahed-Varvani (JV) energy model. For T4 alloy, the fatigue damage mechanism was dominated by basal slip. For T6 alloy, the enhanced pyramidal slip plays an important role to accommodate plastic deformation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Liu · Mater Design · 2014 · 59 · 46610.1016/j.matdes.2014.03.026 ↗
2. Yan · Scr Mater · 2022 · 20710.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114257 ↗
3. Song · J Magnes Alloy · 2022 · 10 · 86310.1016/j.jma.2022.04.001 ↗
4. Liu · J Magnes Alloy · 2019 · 7 · 59710.1016/j.jma.2019.07.006 ↗
5. Cole · Materials Science Forum · 2003 · 419-422 · 4310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.419-422.43 ↗
6. Luo · Sae Technical Papers · 2005 · 1
7. Potzies · Adv Eng Mater · 2004 · 6 · 28110.1002/adem.200400021 ↗
8. Zeng · J Magnes Alloy · 2022
9. Zhang · J Magnes Alloy · 2018 · 6 · 27710.1016/j.jma.2018.08.001 ↗
10. Pan · J Mater Sci Technol · 2016 · 32 · 121110.1016/j.jmst.2016.07.001 ↗
11. Qian · J Mater Sci Technol · 2018 · 34 · 113210.1016/j.jmst.2017.11.053 ↗
12. Cai · Corros Sci · 2021 · 19310.1016/j.corsci.2021.109872 ↗
13. Peng · Mater Sci Eng · 2014 · 611 · 17010.1016/j.msea.2014.05.085 ↗
14. Li · Mater Sci Eng · 2017 · 695 · 34210.1016/j.msea.2017.04.047 ↗
15. Yue · Mater Charact · 2016 · 111 · 9310.1016/j.matchar.2015.11.013 ↗
16. He · Mater Sci Eng · 2013 · 587 · 7210.1016/j.msea.2013.08.046 ↗
17. Dong · Mater Sci Eng · 2010 · 527 · 605310.1016/j.msea.2010.06.030 ↗
18. Pan · Int J Fatigue · 2019 · 118 · 10410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.08.001 ↗
19. Sun · J Mater Sci Technol · 2022 · 99 · 22310.1016/j.jmst.2021.04.074 ↗
20. Zhang · J Mater Sci Technol · 2020 · 51 · 10210.1016/j.jmst.2020.04.003 ↗
21. Mengucci · Mater Sci Eng · 2008 · 479 · 3710.1016/j.msea.2007.06.016 ↗
22. Kang · Mater Sci Eng · 2015 · 645 · 36110.1016/j.msea.2015.08.041 ↗
23. Ghorbanpour · Mater Sci Eng · 2019 · 747 · 2710.1016/j.msea.2019.01.056 ↗
24. Adams · Int J Fatigue · 2016 · 93 · 37210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.05.033 ↗
25. Hasegawa · Int J Fatigue · 2007 · 29 · 183910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.12.003 ↗
26. Ghorbanpour · Int J Fatigue · 2020 · 14110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105903 ↗
27. Deng · Metallur Mater Trans A · 2021 · 52 · 33210.1007/s11661-020-06083-7 ↗
28. Yin · Int J Plasticity · 2021 · 13610.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102878 ↗
29. Kang · J Magnes Alloy · 2020 · 8 · 10310.1016/j.jma.2019.11.012 ↗
30. Li · Acta Mater · 2018 · 159 · 3110.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.013 ↗
31. Xiang · Mater Sci Eng · 2018 · 710 · 7410.1016/j.msea.2017.10.084 ↗
32. Zhu · Scr Mater · 2014 · 77 · 2110.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.01.007 ↗
33. Antion · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 533510.1016/S1359-6454(03)00391-4 ↗
34. Nie · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 169110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00013-6 ↗
35. Nie · Scr Mater · 1999 · 40 · 108910.1016/S1359-6462(99)00084-6 ↗
36. Zhao · Int J Fatigue · 2020 · 132
37. Karparvarfard · Int J Fatigue · 2019 · 118 · 28210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.03.019 ↗
38. Li · Mater Sci Eng · 2016 · 676 · 37710.1016/j.msea.2016.09.001 ↗
39. Ji · J Magnes Alloy · 2022
40. Zhao · Mater Sci Eng · 2021 · 799
41. Dallmeier · Mater Sci Eng · 2014 · 590 · 4410.1016/j.msea.2013.09.088 ↗
42. Begum · Int J Fatigue · 2009 · 31 · 72610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.03.009 ↗
43. Jahed · Int J Fatigue · 2007 · 29 · 64710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.07.017 ↗
44. Zhu · Mater Design · 2012 · 41 · 20310.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.015 ↗
45. Tan · Mater Sci Eng · 2017 · 699 · 24710.1016/j.msea.2017.05.092 ↗
46. Shi · Acta Mater · 2021 · 22110.1016/j.actamat.2021.117442 ↗
47. Bhattacharyya · Acta Mater · 2018 · 146 · 5510.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.043 ↗
48. Fan · Int J Plasticity · 2018 · 106 · 18610.1016/j.ijplas.2018.03.008 ↗
49. Lentz · Nat Commun · 2016 · 7 · 1106810.1038/ncomms11068 ↗
50. Guo · Scr Mater · 2016 · 110 · 1010.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.034 ↗
51. Sandlöbes · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 42910.1016/j.actamat.2010.08.031 ↗
52. Sandlöbes · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 301110.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.006 ↗
53. Hidalgo-Manrique · Acta Mater · 2017 · 124 · 45610.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.019 ↗
54. Xu · Mater Sci Eng · 2017 · 700 · 53010.1016/j.msea.2017.06.051 ↗