MOFs derived Ni-Mn bimetal nano-catalysts with enhanced hydrogen pump effect for boosting hydrogen sorption performance of MgH2
Source abstract
Abstract
• Highly effective NiMn-MOF derivatives were synthesized using a one-pot method. • Peak dehydrogenated temperature of MgH 2 -NiMn-MOF derivative is 218.2 °C (3 °C/min). • The composite presents remarkable rehydrogenated ability at near room temperature. • The enhancing “hydrogen pumping” mechanism of Mg 6 MnO 8 and Mg 2 NiH 4 /Mg 2 Ni is revealed. In the present work, highly effective Ni-MnO binary nanocomposite catalysts were designed and synthesized using a one-pot method from Ni-Mn based bi-metal organic frameworks (MOFs). These nanocomposites were introduced into MgH 2 through ball milling as catalysts to enhance the hydrogen storage properties of MgH 2 . Through varying the Ni/Mn ratio in the bimetal MOFs, it is found that the Ni 1 Mn 1− MOF derived catalyst showed the best promotion effect on MgH 2 . The MgH 2 –10 wt.% Ni 1 Mn 1− MOF derivative demonstrated favorable overall performance with the low desorption peak temperature (218.2 °C) with a saturated hydrogen capacity of 6.42 wt.% and rapid hydrogen release/uptake kinetics. It can still reabsorb about 1.15 wt.% H 2 within 30 min at a temperature as low as 50 °C. Both performance tests (DSC and TPD) and structural characterizations (XRD, HRTEM, etc.) revealed that the synergistic role of in situ formed Mg 6 MnO 8 and Mg 2 NiH 4 /Mg 2 Ni phases for improving the hydrogen sorption properties of MgH 2 . Theoretical calculations reveal that Mg 6 MnO 8 destabilizes metal-H bonds in MgH 2 and Mg 2 NiH 4 , leading to an enhanced “hydrogen pump” effect of Mg 2 NiH 4 for MgH 2 . This research provides a strategy to rational design and preparation of bimetal MOF derivatives for the development of advanced hydrogen storage materials. The enhancing “hydrogen pumping” effect of in situ formed Mg 6 MnO 8 and Mg 2 NiH 4 /Mg 2 Ni on hydrogen storage performance of MgH 2 is revealed experimentally and theoretically.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Schlapbach · Nature · 2001 · 414 · 35310.1038/35104634 ↗
2. Guan · Energ. Environ. Sci. · 2023 · 16 · 492610.1039/D3EE02695G ↗
3. Yue · Ren. Sustain. Energy Rev · 2021 · 14610.1016/j.rser.2021.111180 ↗
4. Hassan · Ren. Sustain. Energy Rev · 2021 · 14910.1016/j.rser.2021.111311 ↗
5. Luo · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1538510.1038/srep15385 ↗
6. Ouyang · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2020 · 83210.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154865 ↗
7. Han · J. Magnesium Alloys · 2023 · 11 · 389610.1016/j.jma.2023.08.009 ↗
8. Li · J. Magnesium Alloys · 2021 · 9 · 222310.1016/j.jma.2021.11.003 ↗
9. Leng · Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. · 2014 · 39 · 1362210.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.02.131 ↗
10. Li · J. Magnesium Alloys · 2021 · 9 · 192210.1016/j.jma.2021.10.002 ↗
11. Zhang · Mater. Today Nano · 2020 · 9
12. Yang · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2023 · 163 · 18210.1016/j.jmst.2023.03.063 ↗
13. Ren · Nano-Micro Lett · 2023 · 15 · 9310.1007/s40820-023-01041-5 ↗
14. Ren · Chem. Eng. J. · 2022 · 43410.1016/j.cej.2022.134701 ↗
15. Wen · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2022 · 10 · 1694110.1039/D2TA04700D ↗
16. Ma · Chem. Eng. J. · 2021 · 406
17. Li · Chem. Eng. J. · 2024 · 485
18. Xia · Nano Energy · 2016 · 26 · 48810.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.016 ↗
19. Liu · Nano Energy · 2019 · 61 · 54010.1016/j.nanoen.2019.04.094 ↗
20. Ma · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2024 · 14
21. Li · Rare Met. · 2024 · 43 · 167210.1007/s12598-023-02496-6 ↗
22. Zhao · J. Magnesium Alloys · 2024 · 12 · 19710.1016/j.jma.2022.04.006 ↗
23. Han · J. Energy Storage · 2024 · 83
24. Meng · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2023 · 11 · 976210.1039/D3TA01029E ↗
25. Ren · Nano-Micro Lett · 2024 · 16 · 16010.1007/s40820-024-01375-8 ↗
26. Bolarin · J. Magnesium Alloys · 2023 · 11 · 274010.1016/j.jma.2021.11.005 ↗
27. Huang · Chem. Eng. J. · 2021 · 421
28. Wang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2018 · 6 · 1617710.1039/C8TA05437A ↗
29. Zhang · Nanoscale Adv · 2020 · 2 · 166610.1039/D0NA00137F ↗
30. Zhang · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2024 · 146 · 1043210.1021/jacs.3c13970 ↗
31. Huang · Mater. Today Energ. · 2021 · 19
32. Wang · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 18 · 1794110.1039/C6CP02374F ↗
33. Fu · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2023 · 138 · 5910.1016/j.jmst.2022.08.019 ↗
34. Zhang · J. Power Sources · 2018 · 398 · 18310.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.072 ↗
35. Wang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2019 · 7 · 1424410.1039/C9TA03665B ↗
36. Zhang · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2019 · 7 · 562610.1039/C9TA00120D ↗
37. Liu · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2019 · 7 · 527710.1039/C8TA12431K ↗
38. Chen · Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. · 2019 · 44 · 1510010.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.047 ↗
39. Luo · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 44 · 17110.1016/j.jmst.2020.01.022 ↗
40. Pang · Cryst. Growth Des. · 2016 · 16 · 240410.1021/acs.cgd.6b00187 ↗
41. Pang · Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. · 2016 · 41 · 1807210.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.08.018 ↗
42. Luo · J. Magnesium Alloys · 2019 · 7 · 5810.1016/j.jma.2018.12.001 ↗
43. Y.P. Pang and Q. Li, Scripta Mater. 130 (2017) 223–228.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.12.015 ↗
44. Ramzan · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94
45. Li · Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. · 2024