High performance of Mg3Bi1.5Sb0.5 based materials for power generation: Revealing the counter-intuitive effect of tuning Bi content on the thermoelectric properties
Source abstract
Abstract
Recently, Mg3Sb2-xBix alloys have attracted intensive attention, with the aim of maximizing the electrical transport performance via donor element doping, increasing the grain size, as well as electronic band structure engineering. However, less attention has been paid to other significant factors, like how these intrinsic point defects and accompanied secondary phases influence thermoelectric properties. In this study, the microstructure and thermoelectric transport properties of Mg3.2Sb0.5Bi1.495-xTe0.005 (x = 0 ∼ 0.2) compounds were systematically investigated, where tuning the Bi content shows the counter-intuitive impact on the thermoelectric properties. It was found that the Bi-poor environment associated with Bi impurities facilitated the increment of cation vacancy formation energy and then increased the carrier concentration, leading to the enhancement of power factor. Simultaneously, the reduction of Bi-rich second phase content weakened the carrier scattering by grain boundaries whereas high carrier mobility was maintained. Moreover, the bipolar thermal conductivity decreased obviously due to the increased majority carrier concentration to suppress the intrinsic excitation. The synergistic optimization pushes the average ZT value (300–573 K) up to 0.95 in the Mg3.2Sb0.5Bi1.295Te0.005 sample. Moreover, the calculated single-leg conversion efficiency is increased up to 9.7% with the hot-side temperature of 573 K, as the record-high value in this system.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices · Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys · Thermal Expansion and Ionic Conductivity
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. Zebarjadi · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2012 · 5 · 514710.1039/C1EE02497C ↗
2. Schierning · Nat. Energy · 2018 · 3 · 9210.1038/s41560-018-0093-4 ↗
3. Dresselhaus · Adv. Mater. · 2007 · 19 · 104310.1002/adma.200600527 ↗
4. Bell · Science · 2008 · 321 · 145710.1126/science.1158899 ↗
5. Zhu · Adv. Mater. · 2017 · 29
6. Tan · Chem. Rev. · 2016 · 116 · 1212310.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00255 ↗
7. Mori · Small · 2017 · 1310.1002/smll.201702013 ↗
8. Liu · Materials Lab · 2022 · 1
9. Goldsmid · Br. J. Appl. Phys. · 1954 · 5 · 38610.1088/0508-3443/5/11/303 ↗
10. Goldsmid · Materials · 2014 · 7 · 257710.3390/ma7042577 ↗
11. Ying · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2017 · 2710.1002/adfm.201604145 ↗
12. Zhao · Nano Energy · 2014 · 7 · 9710.1016/j.nanoen.2014.04.012 ↗
13. Liu · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2018 · 11 · 2310.1039/C7EE02504A ↗
14. Shi · Small Methods · 2018 · 210.1002/smtd.201800022 ↗
15. Zhang · npj Comput. Mater. · 2019 · 5 · 7610.1038/s41524-019-0215-y ↗
16. Kauzlarich · Dalton Trans. · 2007 · 209910.1039/b702266b ↗
17. Hu · J. Materiomics · 2020 · 6 · 72910.1016/j.jmat.2020.06.004 ↗
18. Ren · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 143 · 26510.1016/j.actamat.2017.10.015 ↗
19. Xiao · J. Magn. Alloys · 2021
20. Tang · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2020 · 12 · 835910.1021/acsami.9b23059 ↗
21. Tamaki · Adv. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 1018210.1002/adma.201603955 ↗
22. Zhang · Nat. Commun. · 2017 · 8 · 1390110.1038/ncomms13901 ↗
23. Zhou · J. Magn. Alloys · 2022 · 10 · 171910.1016/j.jma.2022.05.021 ↗
24. Zhang · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 8
25. Mao · ACS Energy Lett · 2017 · 2 · 224510.1021/acsenergylett.7b00742 ↗
26. Song · Mater. Today Phys. · 2019 · 8 · 2510.1016/j.mtphys.2018.12.004 ↗
27. Shi · Adv. Mater. · 2019 · 31
28. Imasato · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2018 · 6 · 1994110.1039/C8TA08975B ↗
29. Zhang · Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2020 · 6
30. Shang · Mater. Today Phys. · 2021 · 21
31. Chen · Nano Energy · 2018 · 52 · 24610.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.059 ↗
32. Shuai · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2017 · 10 · 79910.1039/C7EE00098G ↗
33. Luo · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2021 · 31
34. Shu · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2019 · 2910.5772/intechopen.76823 ↗
35. Zhang · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2019 · 30
36. Jun · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2017 · 114 · 1054810.1073/pnas.1700175114 ↗
37. Kanno · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2018 · 11210.1063/1.5016488 ↗
38. Wood · Adv. Mater. · 2019 · 3110.1002/adma.201902337 ↗
39. Imasato · Mater. Horizons · 2018 · 5 · 5910.1039/C7MH00865A ↗
40. Mo · J. Magn. Alloys · 2022 · 10 · 102410.1016/j.jma.2020.11.023 ↗
41. Mao · Science · 2019 · 365 · 49510.1126/science.aax7792 ↗
42. Liu · Joule · 2021 · 5 · 119610.1016/j.joule.2021.03.017 ↗
43. Liu · Nat. Commun. · 2022 · 13 · 112010.1038/s41467-022-28798-4 ↗
44. Shu · Adv. Sci. · 2022
45. Imasato · Adv. Mater. · 2020 · 3210.1002/adma.201908218 ↗
46. Zhang · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2022 · 120
47. Dong · Calphad · 2021 · 74
48. Zhu · npj Comput. Mater. · 2021 · 7 · 11610.1038/s41524-021-00587-5 ↗
49. Chen · Curr. Appl. Phys. · 2021 · 21 · 2510.1016/j.cap.2020.09.019 ↗
50. Ying · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2022 · 15 · 255710.1039/D2EE00883A ↗
51. Imasato · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2019 · 12 · 96510.1039/C8EE03374A ↗
52. Ying · Nat. Commun. · 2021 · 12 · 112110.1038/s41467-021-21391-1 ↗
53. Kuo · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2018 · 11 · 42910.1039/C7EE03326E ↗
54. Wang · Chin. Phys. B · 2020 · 29