journal article·2024-11Open access

More than the barrier effect: Biodegradable Mg-Ag alloy membranes for guided bone/tissue regeneration

Sihui Ouyang, Xiong Wu, Li Meng, Xuerui Jing, Liying Qiao, Jia She, Kai Zheng, Xianhua Chen, Fusheng Pan

Journal of Magnesium and Alloys· Volume 12· Issue 11

Abstract

Magnesium (Mg) and its alloys have emerged as promising candidates for guided bone/tissue regeneration (GBR/GTR) due to their good mechanical properties, biosafety, and biodegradability. In this study, we present a pioneering application of Mg-Ag alloys featuring tunable corrosion behaviors for GBR/GTR membranes, showcasing their in vitro antibacterial effects, cell migration, and osteogenic differentiation abilities. Mg-Ag alloys with different Ag contents were engineered to facilitate the cell migration of murine fibroblasts (L929) and the osteogenic differentiation of rat bone mesenchymal stem cells (rBMSCs). The Mg-Ag alloy consisted of recrystallized α-Mg grains and fine Mg4Ag second phases, with an observable refinement in the average grain size to 5.6 µm with increasing Ag content. Among the alloys, Mg-9Ag exhibited optimal mechanical strength and moderate plasticity (tensile yield strength of 205.7 MPa, elongation of 20.3%, and a maximum bending load of 437.2 N). Furthermore, the alloying of Ag accelerated the cathodic reaction of pure Mg, leading to a slightly increased corrosion rate of the Mg-Ag alloys while maintaining acceptable general corrosion. Notably, compared with pure Mg, Mg-Ag alloys had superior antibacterial effects against Porphyromonas gingivalis (P. gingivalis) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). Taken together, these results provide evidence for the significant clinical potential of Mg-Ag alloys as GBR/GTR membranes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. Shi · Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. · 2019 · 100 · 52310.1016/j.msec.2019.03.039 ↗
2. Bottino · Dent. Mater. · 2012 · 28 · 70310.1016/j.dental.2012.04.022 ↗
3. He · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2022 · 10 · 260210.1039/D1TB02068D ↗
4. Liu · Acta Biomater. · 2020 · 108 · 20710.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.044 ↗
5. Sun · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2022 · 10 · 76510.1039/D1TB02174E ↗
6. Cordeiro · Biomater. Adv. · 2022 · 13910.1016/j.bioadv.2022.212976 ↗
7. Carbonell · Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. · 2014 · 43 · 7510.1016/j.ijom.2013.05.017 ↗
8. Aprile · Adv. Healthc. Mater. · 2020 · 9
9. Wang · Polymers · 2016 · 8
10. Wang · Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. · 2019 · 104
11. Liu · Acta Biomater. · 2022 · 146 · 3710.1016/j.actbio.2022.03.046 ↗
12. Elgali · Eur. J. Oral Sci. · 2017 · 125 · 31510.1111/eos.12364 ↗
13. Zhang · Bioact. Mater. · 2021 · 6 · 975
14. Porrelli · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2021 · 13 · 1725510.1021/acsami.1c01016 ↗
15. Ding · J. Mater. Chem. B · 2014 · 2 · 191210.1039/C3TB21746A ↗
16. Robinson · Acta Biomater. · 2010 · 6 · 186910.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.007 ↗
17. Zhou · Biomater. Sci. · 2021 · 9 · 80710.1039/D0BM01584A ↗
18. Si · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2021 · 9 · 28110.1016/j.jma.2020.09.013 ↗
19. Fan · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2014 · 24 · 393310.1002/adfm.201304202 ↗
20. Zhang · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2023 · 11 · 218210.1016/j.jma.2021.12.006 ↗
21. Bryla · Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. · 2020 · 10910.1016/j.msec.2019.110543 ↗
22. Liu · Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. · 2017 · 2017
23. Chen · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2022 · 10 · 338010.1016/j.jma.2021.05.013 ↗
24. Degner · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2013 · 282 · 26410.1016/j.apsusc.2013.05.115 ↗
25. Shi · Corros. Sci. · 2010 · 52 · 57910.1016/j.corsci.2009.10.016 ↗
26. Principles and prevention
27. ISO 10993-12:2021 Biological evaluation of medical devices— Part 12: sample preparation and reference materials.
28. Bian · Acta Biomater. · 2017 · 64 · 42110.1016/j.actbio.2017.10.004 ↗
29. Chen · Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. · 2016 · 62 · 35010.1016/j.msec.2016.01.081 ↗
30. Ardizzone · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 1997 · 119 · 25310.1016/S0169-4332(97)00180-3 ↗
31. Yang · Corros. Sci. · 2021 · 185
32. Abdelaziz · J. Adv. Res. · 2021 · 28 · 5110.1016/j.jare.2020.06.014 ↗
33. Mu · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2021 · 31
34. Tie · Eur. Cell Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 28410.22203/eCM.v025a20 ↗
35. Mohammadi-Zerankeshi · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2023 · 22 · 167710.1016/j.jmrt.2022.12.026 ↗
36. Wang · Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. · 2010 · 528 · 32310.1016/j.msea.2010.09.004 ↗
37. Xiao · Scripta Mater. · 2021 · 191 · 21910.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.08.040 ↗
38. Xiao · Scripta Mater. · 2020 · 177 · 6910.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.10.012 ↗
39. Zhang · Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. · 2022 · 856
40. Shu · Int. J. Biol. Macromol. · 2023 · 224 · 104010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.189 ↗
41. Mohammadi Zerankeshi · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2022 · 10 · 173710.1016/j.jma.2022.04.010 ↗
42. Tie · Mater. Corros. · 2014 · 65 · 56910.1002/maco.201206903 ↗
43. Jang · Acta Biomater. · 2013 · 9 · 876110.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.026 ↗
44. Shi · Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. · 2020 · 10910.1016/j.msec.2019.110548 ↗
45. Shahed · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2023
46. Chen · Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. · 2017 · 75 · 90610.1016/j.msec.2017.02.142 ↗
47. Zhang · Corros. Sci. · 2022 · 198
48. Sondi · J. Colloid. Interface Sci. · 2004 · 275 · 17710.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.012 ↗
49. Chatzistavrou · Acta Biomater. · 2014 · 10 · 372310.1016/j.actbio.2014.04.030 ↗
50. Wang · Adv. Sci. · 2020 · 7
51. Wang · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2022 · 10 · 332710.1016/j.jma.2022.11.014 ↗
52. Zhao · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2022
53. Hung · Acta Biomater. · 2019 · 98 · 24610.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.001 ↗
54. Luo · Biomater. Sci. · 2023 · 11 · 726810.1039/D3BM01146A ↗
55. Zhao · ACS. Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 1782610.1021/acsami.5b04168 ↗
56. Yang · Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. · 2021 · 119