Quantification of grain boundary effects on the geometrically necessary dislocation density evolution and strain hardening of polycrystalline Mg 4Al using in situ tensile testing in scanning electron microscope and HR-EBSD
Source abstract
Abstract
In situ tensile testing in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) in conjunction with high-resolution electron backscatter diffraction (HR-EBSD) under load was used to characterize the evolution of geometrically necessary dislocation (GND) densities at individual grain boundaries as a function of applied strain in a polycrystalline Mg4Al alloy. The increase in GND density was investigated at plastic strains of 0 %, 0.6 %, 2.2 %, 3.3 % from the area including 76 grains and correlated with (i) geometric compatibility between slip systems across grain boundaries, and (ii) plastic incompatibility. We develop expressions for the grain boundary GND density evolution as a function of plastic strain and plastic incompatibility, from which uniaxial tensile stress-strain response of polycrystalline Mg4Al are computed and compared with experimental measurement. The findings in this study contribute to understanding the mechanisms governing the strain hardening response of single-phase polycrystalline alloys and more reliable prediction of mechanical behaviors in diverse microstructures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Chen · Acta Biomater. · 2014 · 10 · 456110.1016/j.actbio.2014.07.005 ↗
2. Prasad · J. Magnes. Alloy · 2022 · 10 · 110.1016/j.jma.2021.05.012 ↗
3. Zhang · Mater. Des. · 2022 · 221
4. Sankaranarayanan · Mater. Today Proc. · 2021 · 39 · 31110.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.220 ↗
5. Wang · Acta Mater. · 2014 · 81 · 8310.1016/j.actamat.2014.08.023 ↗
6. Guan · Acta Mater. · 2019 · 173 · 14210.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.016 ↗
7. Yuan · Scr. Mater. · 2011 · 65 · 99410.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.08.028 ↗
8. Yu · Acta Mater. · 2017 · 128 · 31310.1016/j.actamat.2017.02.044 ↗
9. Nakata · J. Mag. Alloys · 2023 · 11 · 399210.1016/j.jma.2023.08.006 ↗
10. Yoo · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 84010.1016/j.msea.2022.142993 ↗
11. Koike · Acta Mater. · 2003 · 51 · 205510.1016/S1359-6454(03)00005-3 ↗
12. Agnew · Int. J. Plast. · 2005 · 21 · 116110.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.018 ↗
13. Hall · Proc. Phys. Soc. Lond. · 1951 · 64 · 74710.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303 ↗
14. Armstrong · Philos. Mag. · 1962 · 7 · 4510.1080/14786436208201857 ↗
15. Andani · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 200 · 14810.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.079 ↗
16. Andani · Acta Mater. · 2022 · 22610.1016/j.actamat.2021.117613 ↗
17. Lee · Metall. Trans. A · 1990 · 21 · 243710.1007/BF02646988 ↗
18. Shen · Acta Metall. · 1988 · 36 · 323110.1016/0001-6160(88)90058-2 ↗
19. Shen · Scr. Mater. · 1986 · 20 · 921
20. Luster · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 1995 · 26 · 174510.1007/BF02670762 ↗
21. Bayerschen · J. Mater. Sci. · 2016 · 51 · 224310.1007/s10853-015-9553-4 ↗
22. Bieler · Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 18 · 21210.1016/j.cossms.2014.05.003 ↗
23. Bieler · Int. J. Plast. · 2019 · 118 · 26910.1016/j.ijplas.2019.02.014 ↗
24. Ashby · Philos. Mag. · 1970 · 170 · 39910.1080/14786437008238426 ↗
25. Kubin · Scr. Mater. · 2003 · 48 · 11910.1016/S1359-6462(02)00335-4 ↗
26. Hirth · Metall. Trans. · 1972 · 3 · 304710.1007/BF02661312 ↗
27. Taylor · J. Inst. Met. · 1938 · 62 · 307
28. Mecking · Scr. Mater. · 1996 · 35 · 46510.1016/1359-6462(96)00137-6 ↗
29. Caceres · Philos. Mag. · 2008 · 88 · 97710.1080/14786430801968611 ↗
30. Tome · Acta Metall. · 1984 · 32 · 163710.1016/0001-6160(84)90222-0 ↗
31. Bieler · JOM · 2009 · 61 · 4510.1007/s11837-009-0180-x ↗
32. Vachhani · Int. J. Plast. · 2016 · 81 · 8710.1016/j.ijplas.2016.01.001 ↗
33. Song · Acta Mater. · 2023 · 265
34. Abuzaid · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2012 · 60 · 120110.1016/j.jmps.2012.02.001 ↗
35. Jiang · Int. J. Plast. · 2015 · 69 · 10210.1016/j.ijplas.2015.02.005 ↗
36. Lee · Scr. Mater. · 1989 · 23 · 799
37. Lee · Philos. Mag. A · 1990 · 62 · 13110.1080/01418619008244340 ↗
38. Gussev · Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. · 2024 · 2810.1016/j.cossms.2023.101132 ↗
39. Nye · Acta Metall. · 1953 · 1 · 15310.1016/0001-6160(53)90054-6 ↗
40. Muransky · Acta Mater. · 2019 · 175 · 29710.1016/j.actamat.2019.05.036 ↗
41. Sulkowski · Acta Phys. Pol. A · 2012 · 122 · 52810.12693/APhysPolA.122.528 ↗
42. Khosravani · Acta Mater. · 2015 · 100 · 20210.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.024 ↗
43. Dunlap · Ultramicroscopy · 2018 · 184 · 12510.1016/j.ultramic.2017.08.017 ↗
44. Ma · Acta Mater. · 2016 · 116 · 4310.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.023 ↗
45. Ma · Acta Mater. · 2010 · 58 · 469310.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.003 ↗
46. Li · J. Appl. Cryst. · 2012 · 45 · 109810.1107/S0021889812039519 ↗
47. Han · Int. J. Plast. · 2020 · 13110.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102731 ↗
48. jiang · J. Magnes. Alloys · 2020 · 8 · 118610.1016/j.jma.2020.01.002 ↗
49. Guo · Acta Mater. · 2014 · 76 · 110.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.015 ↗
50. Su · Int. J. Plast. · 2016 · 86 · 17010.1016/j.ijplas.2016.08.007 ↗
51. Xiao · Int. J Plast. · 2017 · 90 · 21210.1016/j.ijplas.2017.01.007 ↗
52. Ding · Acta Mater. · 2016 · 103 · 41610.1016/j.actamat.2015.10.023 ↗
53. Lavrentev · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 1975 · 18 · 26110.1016/0025-5416(75)90179-2 ↗
54. Tsivinsky · Krist-Tech · 1975 · 10 · 510.1002/crat.19750100102 ↗
55. Jiang · Ultramicroscopy · 2013 · 125 · 110.1016/j.ultramic.2012.11.003 ↗