Analysis of element loss, densification, and defects in laser-based powder-bed fusion of magnesium alloy WE43
Source abstract
Abstract
It is well known that laser-based powder-bed fusion (L-PBF) additive manufacturing of magnesium (Mg) and its alloys is associated with high Mg loss due to vaporization (MgLoss) and high incidence of many types of defects in the manufactured parts/samples. Despite this, MgLoss, densification, and defect characteristics have not been holistically considered in the determination of the optimal values of L-PBF processing parameters for Mg and its alloys. This study presents a combined modeling and experimental approach applied for a widely used Mg alloy (WE43) to address this shortcoming in the literature. First, an experimentally calibrated model is proposed to determine MgLoss as a function of the L-PBF processing parameters. The model couples the temperature profile using a double ellipsoidal heat source with a Langmuir vaporization model and is calibrated using the width of the single-track L-PBF process and the measured Mgloss using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Second, the densification of the samples is determined using a modification of the Archimedes method that considers the amount of MgLoss in the calculation of the relative density. Third, a comprehensive and quantitative study is conducted on the relationships between the characteristics of porosity defects and the L-PBF processing parameters. Finally, the optimized L-PBF processing parameters are determined by considering the MgLoss, densification, and the characteristics of defects. The present study yields 0.23 wt.% MgLoss compared to 2 wt.% MgLoss that was reported in the previous studies. Furthermore, more than 99.5% densification is achieved while only ∼2% and ∼0.5% of the total defects are characterized as keyhole and lack of fusion defects, respectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · High Entropy Alloys Studies · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Moosbrugger · ASM Int · 2017 · 1
2. Ni · Adv. Mater. Res. · 2013 · 79410.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.668.794 ↗
3. Shrestha · Surf. Eng. · 2010 · 26 · 31310.1179/026708410X12736782825894 ↗
4. Magnesium Alloys Development towards the 21st Century | Scientific.Net, (n.d.).
5. Frazier · J. Mater. Eng. Perform. · 2014 · 23 · 191710.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
6. Thomas · Acta Mater · 2016 · 108 · 2610.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.025 ↗
7. Pawlak · Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. · 2017 · 17 · 910.1016/j.acme.2016.07.007 ↗
8. Salehi · Powder Technol · 2018 · 333 · 25210.1016/j.powtec.2018.04.026 ↗
9. Hu · Mater. Manuf. Process. · 2015 · 30 · 129810.1080/10426914.2015.1025963 ↗
10. Zhang · Mater. Des. · 2012 · 34 · 75310.1016/j.matdes.2011.06.061 ↗
11. Wei · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2014 · 611 · 21210.1016/j.msea.2014.05.092 ↗
12. Shuai · J. Alloys Compd. · 2017 · 691 · 96110.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.019 ↗
13. Wei · Mater. Lett. · 2015 · 156 · 18710.1016/j.matlet.2015.05.074 ↗
14. Deng · Mater. Charact. · 2020 · 16510.1016/j.matchar.2020.110377 ↗
15. R. Tandon, T. Wilks, M. Gieseke, C. Noelke, S. Kaierle, T. Palmer, Eur. Congr. Exhib. Powder Metall. Eur. PM Conf. Proc., 2015: p. 1.
16. Bär · Acta Biomater · 2019 · 98 · 3610.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.056 ↗
17. Gangireddy · Addit. Manuf. · 2019 · 26 · 53
18. Zumdick · Mater. Charact. · 2019 · 147 · 38410.1016/j.matchar.2018.11.011 ↗
19. Esmaily · Addit. Manuf. · 2020 · 35
20. Hyer · Addit. Manuf. · 2020 · 33
21. Block-Bolten · Metall. Trans. B. · 1984 · 15 · 46110.1007/BF02657376 ↗
22. Klassen · Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2017 · 2510.1088/1361-651X/aa5289 ↗
23. Khan · Metall. Trans. B. · 1984 · 15 · 64110.1007/BF02657284 ↗
24. E.A. Brandes, G.B. Brook, Elsevier Inc., 1992. doi:10.1016/C2009-0-25363-3.10.1016/C2009-0-25363-3 ↗
25. Mukherjee · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 110.1038/s41598-016-0001-8 ↗
26. Ahsan · JOM · 2020 · 72 · 42910.1007/s11837-019-03872-3 ↗
27. Kik · Materials (Basel) · 2020 · 13 · 265310.3390/ma13112653 ↗
28. Fachinotti · Int. j. Numer. Method. Biomed. Eng. · 2011 · 27 · 59510.1002/cnm.1324 ↗
29. Mirkoohi · Materials (Basel) · 2019 · 12 · 205210.3390/ma12132052 ↗
30. Goldak · Metall. Trans. B. · 1984 · 15 · 29910.1007/BF02667333 ↗
31. H. Hyer, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Central Florida, 2020.
32. Cao · J. Mater. · 2006 · 171 · 188
33. Su · J. Alloys Compd. · 2018 · 747 · 43110.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.070 ↗
34. Campanelli · Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. · 2017 · 89 · 88510.1007/s00170-016-9135-x ↗
35. A.B. Spierings, G. Levy, Proc. Annu. Int. Solid Free. Fabr. Symp., Austin, TX, 2009: pp. 342–353.
36. Han · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2020 · 8 · 32910.1016/j.jma.2019.11.014 ↗
37. Smeltzer · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1958 · 105 · 6710.1149/1.2428764 ↗
38. Anisimov · JETP · 1973 · 37 · 441
39. Knight · AIAA J · 1979 · 17 · 51910.2514/3.61164 ↗
40. Asadi · New Featur. Magnes. Alloy. · 2012
41. J.D. Shearouse, B.A. Mikucki, in: SAE Tech. Pap., 1994. doi:10.4271/940776.10.4271/940776 ↗
42. Snell · JOM · 2020 · 72 · 10110.1007/s11837-019-03761-9 ↗