Local hardening and asymmetric twin growth by twin-twin interactions in a Mg alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, the role of twin-twin interactions on the distributions of local defects (e.g., dislocations) and stress fields in a magnesium alloy is investigated. A co-zone (101¯2)-(1¯012) tensile twin junction in a deformed Mg-3wt.%Y alloy is analyzed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The results show that the morphology of the impinging (1¯012) twin is asymmetric, and the non-interacting boundary of the recipient (101¯2) twin is irregular. Detailed analysis of TEM images reveals that type-II pyramidal [1¯21¯3](12¯12) dislocations concentrate in the vicinity of the twin-twin junction site. The same 〈c + a〉 dislocations are also observed inside the interacting twin domains along with a few 〈a〉 dislocations. The 〈c + a〉 dislocations emanating from the impinging (1¯012) twin boundary have edge character and are extended with faults parallel to the basal plane. In contrast, the 〈c + a〉 dislocations connected to the recipient (101¯2) twin are predominantly screw orientation and compact. Elasto-viscoplastic fast Fourier transform based crystal plasticity calculations are performed to rationalize the observed twin morphology and local dislocation distribution. The model calculations suggest that the local stress fields generated at the junction site where the two twins meet are responsible for the experimentally observed concentration of 〈c + a〉 dislocations. The calculated stress fields are asymmetric with respect to the junction site, explaining the observed asymmetric morphology of the impinging twin. Overall, these findings show strong effects of twin-twin interactions on the distribution of dislocations as well as the evolution of the twinned microstructure and as such, can help advance understanding of twinning in Mg alloys and their effect on mechanical behavior.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. Kulekci · Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. · 2008 · 39 · 85110.1007/s00170-007-1279-2 ↗
2. Partridge · Metall. Rev. · 1967 · 12 · 16910.1179/imr.1967.12.1.169 ↗
3. Yoo · Metall. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. · 1981 · 12 · 40910.1007/BF02648537 ↗
4. Barnett · Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process. · 2007 · 464 · 110.1016/j.msea.2006.12.037 ↗
5. Beyerlein · Philos. Mag. · 2010 · 90 · 407310.1080/14786435.2010.517966 ↗
6. Hirth · 1992
7. Zaiser · Phys. Rev. B · 2001 · 6410.1103/PhysRevB.64.224102 ↗
8. Madec · Science · 2003 · 301 · 187910.1126/science.1085477 ↗
9. Monnet · Acta Mater. · 2004 · 52 · 431710.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.048 ↗
10. Madec · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2002 · 8910.1103/PhysRevLett.89.255508 ↗
11. Yaddanapudi · Acta Mater. · 2021 · 20410.1016/j.actamat.2020.116514 ↗
12. Chen · Acta Mater. · 2019 · 164 · 44010.1016/j.actamat.2018.10.064 ↗
13. Zhang · Acta Mater. · 2017 · 133 · 20810.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.034 ↗
14. Wang · Acta Mater. · 2019 · 165 · 47110.1016/j.actamat.2018.12.003 ↗
15. Gong · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 155 · 18710.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.066 ↗
16. Gong · J. Mater. Res. · 2020 · 35 · 164710.1557/jmr.2020.65 ↗
17. Bertin · Int. J. Plast. · 2014 · 62 · 7210.1016/j.ijplas.2014.06.010 ↗
18. Ardeljan · Int. J. Plast. · 2017 · 99 · 8110.1016/j.ijplas.2017.09.002 ↗
19. Capolungo · Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process. · 2009 · 513-14 · 4210.1016/j.msea.2009.01.035 ↗
20. Serra · Philos. Mag. A Phys. Condens.Matter Struct. Defects Mech. Prop. · 1996 · 73 · 333
21. Spearot · Phys. Rev. Mater. · 2019
22. Wang · Int. J. Plast. · 2016 · 81 · 6310.1016/j.ijplas.2016.01.012 ↗
23. Serra · Acta Metall. Mater. · 1995 · 43 · 446510.1016/0956-7151(95)00128-I ↗
24. Zhou · Mater. Des. · 2014 · 56 · 96610.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.014 ↗
25. Su · Acta Mater. · 2021 · 20610.1016/j.actamat.2021.116622 ↗
26. Agnew · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2002 · 33 · 85110.1007/s11661-002-0154-x ↗
27. Xu · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2016 · 32 · 123910.1016/j.jmst.2016.08.023 ↗
28. Shi · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2021
29. Shi · Acta Mater. · 2021 · 22110.1016/j.actamat.2021.117442 ↗
30. Roberts · Acta Metall. · 1966 · 14 · 51310.1016/0001-6160(66)90319-1 ↗
31. Jiang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2007 · 445 · 30210.1016/j.msea.2006.09.069 ↗
32. Yu · Scr. Mater. · 2015 · 96 · 4110.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.10.020 ↗
33. Yu · Acta Mater. · 2014 · 77 · 2810.1016/j.actamat.2014.05.030 ↗
34. El Kadiri · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 354910.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.030 ↗
35. Mokdad · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2018 · 737 · 54910.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.043 ↗
36. Morrow · Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process. · 2014 · 613 · 36510.1016/j.msea.2014.06.062 ↗
37. Morrow · Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 45a · 3610.1007/s11661-013-1765-0 ↗
38. Russell · Metals · 2020 · 10 · 140310.3390/met10111403 ↗
39. Yu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2011 · 528 · 781610.1016/j.msea.2011.06.064 ↗
40. Gong · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 159 · 6510.1016/j.actamat.2018.08.004 ↗
41. Kumar · Acta Mater. · 2019 · 168 · 35310.1016/j.actamat.2019.02.037 ↗
42. Lloyd · Materialia · 2020 · 910.1016/j.mtla.2020.100606 ↗
43. Zhang · Mater. Des. · 2020 · 19410.1016/j.matdes.2020.108936 ↗
44. Sun · Mater. Charact. · 2015 · 109 · 16010.1016/j.matchar.2015.09.024 ↗
45. Sandlöbes · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2013 · 576 · 6110.1016/j.msea.2013.03.006 ↗
46. Sandlöbes · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 301110.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.006 ↗
47. Stanford · Acta Mater. · 2015 · 82 · 44710.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.022 ↗
48. Wang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2021 · 81710.1016/j.msea.2021.141373 ↗
49. Lebensohn · Int. J. Plast. · 2012 · 32-33 · 5910.1016/j.ijplas.2011.12.005 ↗
50. Kumar · Acta Mater. · 2015 · 84 · 34910.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.048 ↗
51. Kumar · Acta Mater. · 2016 · 116 · 14310.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.042 ↗
52. Beyerlein · Int. J. Plast. · 2008 · 24 · 86710.1016/j.ijplas.2007.07.017 ↗
53. Simmons · 1971
54. Obara · Acta Metall. · 1973 · 21 · 84510.1016/0001-6160(73)90141-7 ↗
55. Geng · Philos. Mag. · 2015 · 95 · 391010.1080/14786435.2015.1108531 ↗
56. Lentz · Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 45a · 572110.1007/s11661-014-2533-5 ↗
57. Ding · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 146 · 26510.1016/j.actamat.2017.12.049 ↗
58. Leu · Materialia · 2021 · 1710.1016/j.mtla.2021.101124 ↗
59. Geng · Philos. Mag. Lett. · 2014 · 94 · 37710.1080/09500839.2014.916423 ↗
60. Li · Acta Mater. · 2010 · 58 · 17310.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.066 ↗
61. Li · Scr. Mater. · 2017 · 134 · 3710.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.02.040 ↗
62. Christian · Prog. Mater Sci. · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
63. Ostapovets · Philos. Mag. · 2014 · 94 · 282710.1080/14786435.2014.933906 ↗
64. Wang · Mater. Res. Lett. · 2013 · 1 · 8110.1080/21663831.2013.779601 ↗
65. Fernández · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 767910.1016/j.actamat.2013.09.005 ↗
66. Kalidindi · Adv. Eng. Mater. · 2003 · 5 · 22910.1002/adem.200300320 ↗
67. Salem · Mater. Sci. · 2006 · 37a · 259
68. Proust · Int. J. Plast. · 2009 · 25 · 86110.1016/j.ijplas.2008.05.005 ↗
69. El Kadiri · J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2010 · 58 · 61310.1016/j.jmps.2009.12.004 ↗
70. Oppedal · Int. J. Plast. · 2012 · 30-31 · 4110.1016/j.ijplas.2011.09.002 ↗