Comparative study on high temperature deformation behavior and processing maps of Mg-4Zn-1RE-0.5Zr alloy with and without in-situ sub-micron sized TiB2 reinforcement
Source abstract
Abstract
Mg-4Zn-1RE-0.5Zr (ZE41) Mg alloy is extensively used in the aerospace and automobile industries. In order to improve the applicability and performance, this alloy was engineered with in-situ TiB2 reinforcement to form TiB2/ZE41 composite. The high temperature deformation behavior and manufacturability of the newly developed TiB2/ZE41 composite and the parent ZE41 Mg alloy were studied via establishing constitutive modeling of flow stress, deformation activation energy and processing map over a temperature range of 250 °C - 450 °C and strain rate range of 0.001 s−1 - 10 s−1. The predicted flow stress behavior of both materials were found to be well consistent with the experimental values. A significant improvement in activation energy was found in TiB2/ZE41 composite (171.54 kJ/mol) as compared to the ZE41 alloy (148.15 kJ/mol) due to the dispersed strengthening of in-situ TiB2 particles. The processing maps were developed via dynamic material modeling. A wider workability domain and higher peak efficiency (45%) were observed in TiB2/ZE41 composite as compared to ZE41 alloy (41%). The Dynamic recrystallization is found to be the dominating deformation mechanism for both materials; however, particle stimulated nucleation was found to be an additional mode of deformation in TiB2/ZE41 composite. The twinning and stress induced cracks were observed in both the materials at low temperature and high strain rate. A narrow range of instability zone is found in the present TiB2/ZE41 composite among the existing published literature on Mg based composites. The detailed microstructural characterization was carried out in both workability and instability domains to establish the governing deformation mechanisms.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Hu · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2020 · 8 · 84110.1016/j.jma.2020.02.012 ↗
2. Shen · J. Alloys Compd. · 2016 · 686 · 83110.1016/j.jallcom.2016.06.232 ↗
3. Sahoo · Mater. Des. · 2016 · 109 · 30010.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.024 ↗
4. Bhingole · Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. · 2014 · 66 · 20910.1016/j.compositesa.2014.08.001 ↗
5. Khan · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2015 · 3 · 21010.1016/j.jma.2015.08.002 ↗
6. Neil · Corros. Sci. · 2009 · 51 · 38710.1016/j.corsci.2008.11.005 ↗
7. Munro · J. Rerearch Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. · 2000 · 105 · 70910.6028/jres.105.057 ↗
8. Sahoo · J. Alloys Compd. · 2018 · 737 · 57510.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.027 ↗
9. Xiao · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2018 · 710 · 25110.1016/j.msea.2017.10.107 ↗
10. Chen · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2015 · 625 · 35710.1016/j.msea.2014.12.033 ↗
11. Zhu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2013 · 573 · 14810.1016/j.msea.2013.02.051 ↗
12. Sani · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2016 · 4 · 10410.1016/j.jma.2016.05.001 ↗
13. Xia · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2020 · 8 · 91710.1016/j.jma.2020.02.018 ↗
14. Bembalge · Int. J. Mech. Sci. · 2021 · 19110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106100 ↗
15. Prasad · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2009 · 502 · 2510.1016/j.msea.2008.10.041 ↗
16. Sutton · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2020 · 8 · 11110.1016/j.jma.2019.11.007 ↗
17. Prasad · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2009 · 69 · 107010.1016/j.compscitech.2009.01.032 ↗
18. Deng · Mater. Des. · 2015 · 67 · 7210.1016/j.matdes.2014.11.006 ↗
19. Fan · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2021 · 10 · 42210.1016/j.jmrt.2020.11.105 ↗
20. Li · Mater. Charact. · 2021 · 173
21. Wang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2008 · 492 · 48110.1016/j.msea.2008.05.046 ↗
22. Xiao · J. Alloys Compd. · 2019 · 798 · 110.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.244 ↗
23. Sahoo · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2020 · 77310.1016/j.msea.2019.138883 ↗
24. Hadadzadeh · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2017 · 5 · 36910.1016/j.jma.2017.09.002 ↗
25. Zhou · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2017 · 33 · 63710.1016/j.jmst.2015.10.019 ↗
26. Zhang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2017 · 707 · 31510.1016/j.msea.2017.09.056 ↗
27. Zhou · Mater. Des. · 2014 · 64 · 17710.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.039 ↗
28. Zhou · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2010 · 527 · 202210.1016/j.msea.2009.12.009 ↗
29. Shalbafi · J. Alloys Compd. · 2017 · 696 · 126910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.12.087 ↗
30. Spigarelli · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2001 · 321 · 72110.1016/S0921-5093(01)01071-1 ↗
31. Valle · Scr. Mater. · 2007 · 57 · 82910.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.07.002 ↗
32. Ma · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2001 · 61 · 77110.1016/S0266-3538(01)00018-5 ↗
33. Tahreen · Mater. Des. · 2015 · 87 · 24510.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.023 ↗
34. Prasad · JMEPEG · 2003 · 12 · 63810.1361/105994903322692420 ↗
35. Prasad · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 1998 · 243 · 8210.1016/S0921-5093(97)00782-X ↗
36. Xu · Mater. Charact. · 2018 · 145 · 3910.1016/j.matchar.2018.08.028 ↗
37. Goh · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 511510.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.032 ↗
38. Sahoo · J. Alloys Compd. · 2019 · 776 · 86510.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.276 ↗
39. Li · Mater. Des. · 2014 · 56 · 88910.1016/j.matdes.2013.11.037 ↗
40. Zhong · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2014 · 589 · 4110.1016/j.msea.2013.09.062 ↗
41. ION · Acta Mater · 1982 · 30 · 190910.1016/0001-6160(82)90031-1 ↗
42. Zhang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2014 · 612 · 25310.1016/j.msea.2014.06.058 ↗
43. MD · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2016 · 675 · 33810.1016/j.msea.2016.08.077 ↗
44. Nie · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2021 · 9 · 5710.1016/j.jma.2020.08.018 ↗
45. Zhou · J. Alloys Compd. · 2021 · 86810.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159098 ↗
46. ge Fan · Mater. Today Commun. · 2020 · 25
47. Son · 2017 · 695 · 379
48. Wang · J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. · 2014 · 32 · 27010.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.01.011 ↗
49. Sánchez-Martín · Scr. Mater. · 2015 · 104 · 910.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.03.012 ↗
50. Zheng · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2018 · 715 · 20510.1016/j.msea.2018.01.006 ↗
51. Selvam · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2015 · 3 · 22410.1016/j.jma.2015.07.002 ↗