Recent research progress on magnesium alloys in Korea: A review
Source abstract
Abstract
This review highlights the recent advancements in Mg research in South Korea with a prime focus on high-speed-extrudable Mg–Bi-based alloys for high productivity and strength, innovative techniques utilizing {10–12} twinning for improved mechanical properties, and alloying and processing methods for enhanced corrosion resistance. High-alloyed Mg–Bi-based alloys possess thermally stable α-Mg matrix and secondary phase, which ensures high-speed extrusion of these alloys at elevated temperatures without hot cracking. Consequently, they exhibit outstanding extrudability with a maximum extrusion speed of up to 70 m/min. Furthermore, their high alloying contents offer excellent strength even after high-speed extrusion through strong solid solution hardening and particle hardening effects, making them suitable for high-performance extruded Mg products. The pre-twinning process utilizing {10–12} twinning and the combined process of pre-twinning and subsequent annealing have shown promise in controlling microstructure and texture of wrought Mg alloys and thus enhancing their mechanical properties. The pre-twinning process enhances tensile strength, fatigue properties, and age-hardening rate of Mg alloys. Furthermore, the combined processes of pre-twinning and subsequent annealing considerably improve their ductility, stretch formability, bending formability, and damping capacity. Efforts have been made to improve the corrosion resistance of Mg alloys through alloying additions, process treatments, and surface coatings. Alloying elements like Ca, Sc, and Sm alter the microstructural features (such as secondary phases and grain size) that affect the corrosion phenomenon. Process treatments such as multidirectional forging, screw rolling, and pulse electron beam can also improve the corrosion resistance by refining the microstructure. Furthermore, advanced surface coating technologies can create durable and corrosion-resistant layers for effectively protecting the Mg alloys. All these research activities conducted in South Korea have considerably contributed to the widespread utilization of Mg alloys in diverse applications by overcoming the inherent limitations of Mg alloys such as low extrudability, formability, and corrosion resistance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Kulekei · Int. J. Manuf. Technol. · 2008 · 39 · 85110.1007/s00170-007-1279-2 ↗
2. Musfirah · J. Appl. Sci. Res. · 2012 · 8 · 4865
3. Gu · Front. Mater. Sci. China · 2010 · 4 · 11110.1007/s11706-010-0024-1 ↗
4. Gu · Front. Mater. Sci. · 2014 · 8 · 20010.1007/s11706-014-0253-9 ↗
5. Tsakiris · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2021 · 9 · 188410.1016/j.jma.2021.06.024 ↗
6. C. Bettles, M. Barnett, Advances in Wrought Magnesium Alloys: Fundamentals of Processing, Properties and Applications, Woodhead, Cambridge (2012).10.1533/9780857093844 ↗
7. Mallick · 2021
8. Meng · Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.) · 2019 · 32 · 14510.1007/s40195-018-00871-2 ↗
9. Zeng · Int. Mater. Rev. · 2019 · 64 · 2710.1080/09506608.2017.1421439 ↗
10. Park · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2016 · 667 · 17010.1016/j.jallcom.2016.01.163 ↗
11. Jin · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2023 · 11 · 24910.1016/j.jma.2021.07.009 ↗
12. Go · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2020 · 84310.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156026 ↗
13. Suh · Met. Mater. Int. · 2021 · 27 · 269610.1007/s12540-020-00642-8 ↗
14. Go · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 44 · 6210.1016/j.jmst.2019.10.036 ↗
15. S.C. Jin, J.W. Cha, J.H. Lee, T. Lee, S.H. Han, S.H. Park, J. Magnes. Alloy., 10 (11), 3100–3112.10.1016/j.jma.2021.05.009 ↗
16. Jin · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2022 · 10 · 85010.1016/j.jma.2021.04.015 ↗
17. Jin · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2022 · 10 · 188710.1016/j.jma.2020.11.003 ↗
18. Go · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2020 · 82110.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153442 ↗
19. Jin · Mater. Charact. · 2021 · 18110.1016/j.matchar.2021.111500 ↗
20. Cha · Trans. Mater. Process. · 2022 · 31 · 73
21. Cha · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2022 · 10 · 283310.1016/j.jma.2021.07.007 ↗
22. Cha · Trans. Mater. Process. · 2022 · 31 · 253
23. Cha · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2023 · 86210.1016/j.msea.2022.144490 ↗
24. Jin · Trans. Mater. Process. · 2022 · 31 · 344
25. Li · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2022 · 10 · 233410.1016/j.jma.2022.09.003 ↗
26. Lee · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2014 · 619 · 32810.1016/j.msea.2014.09.097 ↗
27. Hong · J. Mater. Res. · 2010 · 25 · 78410.1557/JMR.2010.0094 ↗
28. Kim · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2021 · 9 · 123310.1016/j.jma.2020.11.015 ↗
29. Lee · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2019 · 787 · 51910.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.080 ↗
30. Coy · Corros. Sci. · 2010 · 52 · 389610.1016/j.corsci.2010.08.006 ↗
31. Zhang · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2015 · 31 · 50410.1016/j.jmst.2014.09.018 ↗
32. Choi · Corros. Sci. · 2016 · 103 · 18110.1016/j.corsci.2015.11.017 ↗
33. Stress corrosion cracking of magnesium alloys
34. Song · Corros. Sci. · 2004 · 46 · 95510.1016/S0010-938X(03)00190-2 ↗
35. Yim · Corros. Sci. · 2015 · 90 · 59710.1016/j.corsci.2014.11.003 ↗
36. Han · Met. Mater. Int. · 2015 · 21 · 19410.1007/s12540-015-1024-6 ↗
37. Han · Corros. Sci. · 2012 · 63 · 31610.1016/j.corsci.2012.06.011 ↗
38. Han · Met. Mater. Int. · 2015 · 21 · 110810.1007/s12540-015-5069-3 ↗
39. Han · Met. Mater. Int. · 2012 · 18 · 24310.1007/s12540-012-2007-5 ↗
40. Ha · Corros. Sci. · 2014 · 82 · 36910.1016/j.corsci.2014.01.035 ↗
41. Liu · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2023 · 11 · 1510.1016/j.jma.2022.12.015 ↗
42. Atwell · Metall. Mater. Trans. A · 2007 · 38 · 303210.1007/s11661-007-9323-2 ↗
43. Misiolek · 2005 · 522
44. Jiang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2016 · 678 · 32910.1016/j.msea.2016.10.007 ↗
45. Cheng · Metals · 2018 · 8 · 76610.3390/met8100766 ↗
46. Shuai · J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. · 2017 · 28 · 130
47. Lu · Vacuum · 2018 · 157 · 18010.1016/j.vacuum.2018.08.041 ↗
48. Nakata · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2015 · 648 · 42810.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.051 ↗
49. Nakata · Scr. Mater. · 2015 · 101 · 2810.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.01.010 ↗
50. Nakata · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2016 · 673 · 44310.1016/j.msea.2016.07.098 ↗
51. Jiang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2016 · 667 · 23310.1016/j.msea.2016.04.093 ↗
52. Nakata · Acta Mater. · 2017 · 130 · 26110.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.046 ↗
53. Nakata · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2018 · 712 · 1210.1016/j.msea.2017.11.085 ↗
54. Nakata · Mater. Charact. · 2022 · 19110.1016/j.matchar.2022.112121 ↗
55. Robson · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 273910.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.032 ↗
56. Humphreys · 2004
57. Dieter · 1986
58. Bohlen · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2010 · 527 · 709210.1016/j.msea.2010.07.081 ↗
59. Park · Korean J. Met. Mater. · 2013 · 51 · 63710.3365/KJMM.2013.51.9.637 ↗
60. Park · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2014 · 598 · 39610.1016/j.msea.2014.01.051 ↗
61. Cha · Met. Mater. Int. · 2022 · 28 · 38510.1007/s12540-021-01101-8 ↗
62. Li · Int. J. Fatigue · 2015 · 80 · 46810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.07.001 ↗
63. HSBD Search for Bismuth Compound toxicology, 2008. Compare this data with a research on lead compounds, Retrieved 8 February 2008. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/toxnet.
64. Luckey · 1977
65. Remennik · Mater. Sci. Eng. B · 2011 · 176 · 165310.1016/j.mseb.2011.07.011 ↗
66. Ando · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2014 · 600 · 14510.1016/j.msea.2014.02.010 ↗
67. Yue · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2016 · 673 · 45810.1016/j.msea.2016.07.085 ↗
68. Zhang · Acta Mater. · 2017 · 133 · 20810.1016/j.actamat.2017.05.034 ↗
69. Song · Mater. Des. · 2014 · 62 · 35210.1016/j.matdes.2014.05.034 ↗
70. Pei · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2012 · 550 · 13810.1016/j.msea.2012.04.046 ↗
71. Godet · Scr. Mater. · 2006 · 55 · 105510.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.07.059 ↗
72. Hong · Acta Mater. · 2010 · 58 · 587310.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.002 ↗
73. Cui · Int. J. Plast. · 2017 · 91 · 13410.1016/j.ijplas.2016.09.014 ↗
74. Zhang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 835
75. Zhang · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2021 · 15 · 532610.1016/j.jmrt.2021.11.020 ↗
76. Su · Mater. Res. Express · 2020 · 7
77. Park · Scr. Mater. · 2010 · 62 · 20210.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.10.027 ↗
78. Jiang · Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 389910.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.006 ↗
79. Carneiro · Mater. Charact. · 2021 · 17510.1016/j.matchar.2021.111050 ↗
80. Wang · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2014 · 594 · 4410.1016/j.jallcom.2014.01.100 ↗
81. Kim · Met. Mater. Int. · 2019 · 25 · 154110.1007/s12540-019-00321-3 ↗
82. Carneiro · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2021 · 80110.1016/j.msea.2020.140405 ↗
83. Wu · Acta Mater. · 2008 · 56 · 68810.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.030 ↗
84. Park · Int. J. Fatigue · 2010 · 32 · 183510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2010.05.002 ↗
85. Song · Scr. Mater. · 2012 · 66 · 106110.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.02.047 ↗
86. Xin · Scr. Mater. · 2011 · 64 · 98610.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.02.010 ↗
87. Song · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2013 · 582 · 6810.1016/j.msea.2013.06.047 ↗
88. Emamy · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 84010.1016/j.msea.2022.142996 ↗
89. Kim · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2020 · 83510.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155257 ↗
90. Wu · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2020 · 42 · 17510.1016/j.jmst.2019.10.010 ↗
91. Jin · Met. Mater. Int. · 2003 · 9 · 45310.1007/BF03027150 ↗
92. Chen · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2010 · 496 · 21810.1016/j.jallcom.2010.03.002 ↗
93. Zhang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2022 · 82910.1016/j.msea.2021.142143 ↗
94. Ayer · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2020 · 79310.1016/j.msea.2020.139887 ↗
95. Kang · J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2008 · 201 · 43610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.305 ↗
96. Wang · Mater. Lett. · 2007 · 61 · 459910.1016/j.matlet.2007.02.067 ↗
97. Kim · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2014 · 596 · 21610.1016/j.msea.2013.12.059 ↗
98. Proust · Int. J. Plast. · 2009 · 25 · 86110.1016/j.ijplas.2008.05.005 ↗
99. Burdzik · J. Vibroeng. · 2013 · 15 · 1680
100. Park · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2017 · 680 · 21410.1016/j.msea.2016.10.093 ↗