journal article·2021-09Open access

Development of a novel electrolytic process for producing high-purity magnesium metal from magnesium oxide using a liquid tin cathode

Tae-Hyuk Lee, Toru H. Okabe, Jin-Young Lee, Young Min Kim, Jungshin Kang

Journal of Magnesium and Alloys· Volume 9· Issue 5

Abstract

The current electrolytic processes for magnesium (Mg) metal have several disadvantages, such as anhydrous magnesium chloride (MgCl2) preparation and generation of harmful chlorine (Cl2) gas. To overcome these drawbacks, a novel Mg production process to produce high-purity Mg metal directly from magnesium oxide (MgO) was investigated in this study. The electrolysis of MgO was conducted using a liquid tin (Sn) cathode and a carbon (C) anode in the eutectic composition of a magnesium fluoride (MgF2) – lithium fluoride (LiF) molten salt under an applied voltage of 2.5 V at 1053 – 1113 K. Under certain conditions, the Mg – Sn alloys with Mg2Sn and Mg (Sn) phases were obtained with a current efficiency of 86.6 % at 1053 K. To produce high-purity Mg metal from the Mg – Sn alloy, vacuum distillation was conducted at 1200 – 1300 K for a duration of 5 – 10 h. Following the vacuum distillation, the concentration of Mg in the Mg – Sn alloy feed decreased from 34.1 to 0.17 mass%, and Mg metal with a purity of 99.999 % was obtained at 1200 K. Therefore, the electrolytic process developed here is feasible for the production of high-purity Mg metal from MgO using an efficient method.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Weiler · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2019 · 7 · 29710.1016/j.jma.2019.02.005 ↗
2. Ali · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2015 · 619 · 63910.1016/j.jallcom.2014.09.061 ↗
3. 2010
4. G.J. Kipouras, D.R. Sadoway, , in: G. Mamantov, C.B. Mamantov, J. Braunstein, (Eds.), Advanced in Molten Salt Chemistry, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987, pp. 127–209.
5. Roskill, Magnesium Metal: . 12th ed., Roskill Information Services Ltd., London, 2016.
6. Friedrich · 2006
7. Pidgeon · Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Met. Eng. · 1944 · 159 · 315
8. Halmann · Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. · 2008 · 47 · 214610.1021/ie071234v ↗
9. Du · J. Clean. Prod. · 2010 · 18 · 11210.1016/j.jclepro.2009.08.013 ↗
10. Ramakrishana · Resour. Conserv. Recycl. · 2004 · 42 · 4910.1016/j.resconrec.2004.02.003 ↗
11. Thayer · JOM · 2001 · 53 · 1510.1007/s11837-001-0128-2 ↗
12. Epstein · Hydrometallurgy · 1976 · 2 · 110.1016/0304-386X(76)90009-8 ↗
13. G. Shekhovtsov, V. Shchegolev, V. Devyatkin, A. Tatakin, I. Zabelin, , in: S.N. Mathaudhu, A.A. Luo, N.R. Neelameggham, E.A. Nyberg, W.H. Sillekens (Eds.), Essential Reading in Magnesium Technology, Springer, Cham, 2014, pp. 97–100.10.1002/9781118859803.ch15 ↗
14. Wada · Sci. Rep. · 2017 · 7 · 4651210.1038/srep46512 ↗
15. Aviezer · Hydrometallurgy · 2017 · 169 · 52010.1016/j.hydromet.2017.03.011 ↗
16. Korenko · Energy · 2017 · 135 · 18210.1016/j.energy.2017.06.044 ↗
17. Chuayboon · J. Clean. Prod. · 2019 · 232 · 78410.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.371 ↗
18. Krishnan · Metall. Mater. Trans. B · 2005 · 36 · 46310.1007/s11663-005-0037-9 ↗
19. Guan · Metall. Mater. Trans. E · 2014 · 1 · 132
20. 2018
21. Lee · Metall. Mater. Trans. · 2020 · 51 · 299310.1007/s11663-020-01976-9 ↗
22. Kong · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · E42910.1149/2.1011913jes ↗
23. Barin · 1995
24. Lee · Calphad · 2018 · 62 · 23210.1016/j.calphad.2018.07.006 ↗
25. Kim · Metals (Basel) · 2020 · 10 · 90610.3390/met10070906 ↗
26. Bale · Calphad · 2016 · 54 · 3510.1016/j.calphad.2016.05.002 ↗
27. Kang · Metall. Mater. Trans. B · 2014 · 45 · 126010.1007/s11663-014-0061-8 ↗
28. Sandlobes · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 301110.1016/j.actamat.2012.02.006 ↗