From macro-, through meso- to micro-scale: Densification behavior, deformation response and microstructural evolution of selective laser melted Mg-RE alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
• Densification of SLM Mg-RE alloy was affected by laser input from conduction to keyhole mode. • 2 VPSC proves that deformation of SLM Mg-RE alloy was governed by the basal < a > and prismatic < a > slips. • Precipitation hardening is the primary mechanism driving the mechanical improvement of SLM Mg-RE alloy. To clarify the densification behavior, deformation response and strengthening mechanisms of selective laser melted (SLM) Mg-RE alloys, this study systematically investigates a representative WE43 alloy via advanced material characterization techniques. A suitable laser output mode fell into the transition mode, allowing for the fabrication of nearly full-density samples (porosity = 0.85 ± 0.021%) with favorable mechanical properties (yield strength=351 MPa, ultimate tensile strength = 417 MPa, the elongation at break = 6.5% and microhardness = 137.9 ± 6.15 HV 0.1 ) using optimal processing parameters ( P = 80 W, v = 250 mm/s and d = 50 µm). Viscoplastic self-consistent analysis and transmission electron microscopy observations reveal that the plastic deformation response of the SLM Mg-RE alloys is primarily driven by basal < a > and prismatic < a > slips. Starting from a random texture before deformation (maximum multiple of ultimate density, Max. MUD = 3.95), plastic stretching led the grains to align with the Z-axis, finally resulting in a {0001}< 10 1 ¯ 0 > texture orientation after fracture (Max. MUD = 8.755). Main phases of the SLM state are mainly composed of α-Mg, Mg 24 Y 5 and β’-Mg 41 Nd 5 , with an average grain size of only 4.27 µm (about a quarter of that in the extruded state), resulting in a favorable strength-toughness ratio. Except for the nano-β’ phase and semi-coherent Mg 24 Y 5 phase (mismatch = 16.12%) around the grain boundaries, a small amount of nano-ZrO 2 and Y 2 O 3 particles also play a role in dispersion strengthening. The high mechanical properties of the SLM state are chiefly attributed to precipitation hardening (44.41%), solid solution strengthening (34.06%) and grain boundary strengthening (21.53%), with precipitation hardening being predominantly driven by dislocation strengthening (67.77%). High-performance SLM Mg-RE alloy components were manufactured and showcased at TCT Asia 2024, receiving favorable attention. This work underscores the significant application potential of SLM Mg-RE alloys and establishes a strong foundation for advancing their use in the biomedical fields.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · High Entropy Alloys Studies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Witte · Acta Biomater · 2010 · 6 · 168010.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.028 ↗
2. Li · Acta Biomater · 2018 · 67 · 37810.1016/j.actbio.2017.12.008 ↗
3. Willbold · J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. · 2016 · 105 · 32910.1002/jbm.a.35893 ↗
4. Davim · 2015
5. Chang · Adv. Powd. Mater. · 2023 · 2
6. Davim · Bioresources · 2024 · 19 · 410.15376/biores.19.1.4-5 ↗
7. 2021
8. Bourell · Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. · 2016 · 46 · 110.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031606 ↗
9. Prashar · J. Clean. Prod. · 2021 · 310
10. Esmaily · Addit. Manuf. · 2020 · 35
11. Hu · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2023 · 27 · 81310.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.306 ↗
12. Bian · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2024 · 198 · 24310.1016/j.jmst.2024.01.075 ↗
13. Dixit · Mater. Design · 2011 · 32 · 365510.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.049 ↗
14. Davim · 2013
15. Chang · 2024 · 413
16. Li · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2023 · 154 · 6510.1016/j.jmst.2022.12.053 ↗
17. Zumdick · Mater. Charact. · 2019 · 147 · 38410.1016/j.matchar.2018.11.011 ↗
18. Kang · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2014 · 2 · 10910.1016/j.jma.2014.01.010 ↗
19. Li · Addit. Manuf. · 2023 · 77
20. Xiaobo Zhang · Mater. Lett. · 2012 · 6 · 209
21. Gangireddy · Addit. Manuf. · 2019 · 26 · 53
22. Suchý · J. Manuf. Process. · 2021 · 69 · 55610.1016/j.jmapro.2021.08.006 ↗
23. Hyer · Addit. Manuf. · 2020 · 33
24. Cegarra · J. Manuf. Mater. Process. · 2023 · 7 · 112
25. Chang · Mater. Letters · 2022 · 30910.1016/j.matlet.2021.131439 ↗
26. Zhou · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2022 · 98 · 8710.1016/j.jmst.2021.03.087 ↗
27. Xiaohua Zhang · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2024 · 29 · 215410.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.274 ↗
28. Dong · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2021 · 73 · 15110.1016/j.jmst.2020.09.031 ↗
29. Fuller · Acta Biomater · 2023 · 166 · 41910.1016/j.actbio.2023.05.013 ↗
30. Plunkett · 2005
31. Zhou · J. Mater. Res. Technol. · 2023 · 22 · 336210.1016/j.jmrt.2022.12.083 ↗
32. Lixiang Yang · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2023 · 11 · 276310.1016/j.jma.2021.08.010 ↗
33. Bär · Acta Biomater · 2019 · 98 · 3610.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.056 ↗
34. Yi · Mater. Characterizat. · 2022 · 19110.1016/j.matchar.2022.112124 ↗
35. Yang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 2007 · 454-455 · 27410.1016/j.msea.2006.11.047 ↗
36. Wen · Scr. Mater. · 2022 · 21010.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114451 ↗
37. Sen Wang · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2023 · 11 · 412810.1016/j.jma.2023.11.002 ↗
38. Nie · Scr. Mater. · 2003 · 48 · 100910.1016/S1359-6462(02)00497-9 ↗
39. Mayumi Suzuki · Mater. Sci. Eng. A. · 1998 · 252 · 24810.1016/S0921-5093(98)00662-5 ↗
40. Wan · Acta Mater · 2020 · 200 · 27410.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.024 ↗
41. Xu · J. Magnes. Alloy. · 2024