Location-dependent effect of nickel on hydrogen dissociation and diffusion on Mg (0001) surface: Insights into hydrogen storage material design
Source abstract
Abstract
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations have been performed to investigate the hydrogen dissociation and diffusion on Mg (0001) surface with Ni incorporating at various locations. The results show that Ni atom is preferentially located inside Mg matrix rather than in/over the topmost surface. Further calculations reveal that Ni atom locating in/over the topmost Mg (0001) surface exhibits excellent catalytic effect on hydrogen dissociation with an energy barrier of less than 0.05 eV. In these cases, the rate-limiting step has been converted from hydrogen dissociation to surface diffusion. In contrast, Ni doping inside Mg bulk not only does little help to hydrogen dissociation but also exhibits detrimental effect on hydrogen diffusion. Therefore, it is crucial to stabilize the Ni atom on the surface or in the topmost layer of Mg (0001) surface to maintain its catalytic effect. For all the case of Ni-incorporated Mg (0001) surfaces, the hydrogen atom prefers firstly immigrate along the surface and then penetrate into the bulk. It is expected that the theoretical findings in the present study could offer fundamental guidance to future designing on efficient Mg-based hydrogen storage materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Jain · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2010 · 35 · 513310.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.08.088 ↗
2. Han · Mater. Design · 2018 · 158 · 21310.1016/j.matdes.2018.08.036 ↗
3. Chen · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2018 · 6 · 305510.1039/C7TA09289J ↗
4. Chen · J. Catal. · 2019 · 379 · 12110.1016/j.jcat.2019.09.022 ↗
5. Han · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2017 · 394 · 37110.1016/j.apsusc.2016.10.101 ↗
6. Luo · J. Magn. Alloys · 2019 · 7 · 5810.1016/j.jma.2018.12.001 ↗
7. Sun · Energy Storage Mater. · 2018 · 10 · 16810.1016/j.ensm.2017.01.010 ↗
8. Sadhasivam · Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. · 2017 · 72 · 52310.1016/j.rser.2017.01.107 ↗
9. Banerjee · J. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 12910.1063/1.3000673 ↗
10. Pozzo · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2009 · 34 · 192210.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.109 ↗
11. AlMatrouk · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2015 · 40 · 531910.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.01.112 ↗
12. Song · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 1995 · 20 · 22110.1016/0360-3199(94)E0024-S ↗
13. Lv · J. Alloys Compd. · 2015 · 641 · 17610.1016/j.jallcom.2015.04.074 ↗
14. Xie · J. Alloys Compd. · 2009 · 482 · 38810.1016/j.jallcom.2009.04.028 ↗
15. El-Eskandarany · Sci. Rep. · 2016 · 6 · 3733510.1038/srep37335 ↗
16. Hanada · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 718810.1021/jp044576c ↗
17. Liang · J. Alloys Compd. · 1998 · 267 · 30210.1016/S0925-8388(97)00533-1 ↗
18. Shao · J. Alloys Compd. · 2009 · 477 · 30110.1016/j.jallcom.2008.11.004 ↗
19. Kuklin · J. Alloys Compd. · 2014 · 609 · 9310.1016/j.jallcom.2014.04.160 ↗
20. Liu · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2019 · 44 · 2788510.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.045 ↗
21. Pozzo · J. Chem. Phys. · 2008 · 12810.1063/1.2835541 ↗
22. Chen · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2012 · 37 · 30910.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.09.065 ↗
23. Chen · Surf. Sci. · 2012 · 606 · L4510.1016/j.susc.2012.03.008 ↗
24. Banerjee · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 1057410.1021/jp9002092 ↗
25. Wang · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2014 · 305 · 4010.1016/j.apsusc.2014.02.153 ↗
26. Perdew · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
27. Han · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2020 · 50410.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144491 ↗
28. Monkhorst · Phys. Rev. B · 1976 · 13 · 518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
29. Govind · Comp. Mater. Sci. · 2003 · 28 · 25010.1016/S0927-0256(03)00111-3 ↗
30. Han · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2019 · 480 · 24310.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.084 ↗
31. Chen · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2020 · 504
32. Tang · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2019 · 479 · 62610.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.124 ↗
33. Wright · Surf. Sci. · 1994 · 302 · 21510.1016/0039-6028(94)91111-8 ↗
34. Zhang · Sci. China Ser. E Technol. Sci. · 2009 · 52 · 189710.1007/s11431-009-0129-x ↗
35. Lin · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2011 · 115 · 1858210.1021/jp2034467 ↗
36. Hammer · Surf. Sci. · 1995 · 343 · 21110.1016/0039-6028(96)80007-0 ↗
37. Vegge · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 7010.1103/PhysRevB.70.035412 ↗
38. Sprunger · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 1991 · 187 · 55910.1016/0009-2614(91)90436-D ↗
39. Zhang · J. Rare Earths · 2012 · 30 · 57310.1016/S1002-0721(12)60093-3 ↗
40. Luo · 2007
41. Qin · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2008 · 33 · 70910.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.10.029 ↗
42. Jeon · Nat Mater · 2011 · 10 · 28610.1038/nmat2978 ↗
43. Cho · Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1080410.1038/ncomms10804 ↗
44. Jia · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2017 · 42 · 2293310.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.106 ↗
45. Liu · J. Mater. Chem. · 2012 · 22 · 2254210.1039/c2jm34730j ↗
46. Ma · Sustain. Energy Fuels · 2020 · 4 · 469410.1039/D0SE00818D ↗
47. Yao · J. Magn. Alloys · 2020 · 8 · 46110.1016/j.jma.2019.06.006 ↗
48. Li · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2016 · 41 · 1812110.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.170 ↗
49. Ma · ACS Appl. Energy Mater. · 2018 · 1 · 115810.1021/acsaem.7b00266 ↗
50. Hanada · J. Alloys Compd. · 2005 · 404-406 · 71610.1016/j.jallcom.2004.12.166 ↗