journal article·2021-09Open access

Tailoring bimodal grain structure of Mg-9Al-1Zn alloy for strength-ductility synergy: Co-regulating effect from coarse Al2Y and submicron Mg17Al12 particles

Yong-Kang Li, Min Zha, Hai-Long Jia, Si-Qing Wang, Hong-Min Zhang, Xiao Ma, Teng Tian, Pin-Kui Ma, Hui-Yuan Wang

Journal of Magnesium and Alloys· Volume 9· Issue 5

Abstract

Grain boundary strengthening is an effective strategy for increasing mechanical properties of Mg alloys. However, this method offers limited strengthening in bimodal grain-structured Mg alloys due to the difficultly in increasing the volume fraction of fine grains while keeping a small grain size. Herein, we show that the volume fraction of fine grains (FGs, ∼2.5 µm) in the bimodal grain structure can be tailored from ∼30 vol.% in Mg-9Al-1 Zn (AZ91) to ∼52 vol.% in AZ91–1Y (wt.%) processed by hard plate rolling (HPR). Moreover, a superior combination of a high ultimate tensile strength (∼405 MPa) and decent uniform elongation (∼9%) is achieved in present AZ91–1Y alloy. It reveals that a desired bimodal grain structure can be tailored by the co-regulating effect from coarse Al2Y particles resulting in inhomogeneous recrystallization, and dispersed submicron Mg17Al12 particles depressing the growth of recrystallized grains. The findings offer a valuable insight in tailoring bimodal grain-structured Mg alloys for optimized strength and ductility.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. Pan · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2016 · 663 · 32110.1016/j.jallcom.2015.12.057 ↗
2. Song · J. Magn. Alloy. · 2020 · 8 · 110.1016/j.jma.2020.02.003 ↗
3. Wang · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2018 · 34 · 24510.1016/j.jmst.2017.07.019 ↗
4. Zheng · J. Magn. Alloy. · 2016 · 4 · 11510.1016/j.jma.2016.04.002 ↗
5. Zha · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2018 · 34 · 25710.1016/j.jmst.2017.11.018 ↗
6. Wang · Sci. Rep. · 2015 · 5 · 1710010.1038/srep17100 ↗
7. Zha · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2018 · 765 · 122810.1016/j.jallcom.2018.04.328 ↗
8. Kang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2017 · 697 · 21110.1016/j.msea.2017.05.017 ↗
9. Zhang · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2019 · 780 · 31210.1016/j.jallcom.2018.11.229 ↗
10. Sun · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2018 · 734 · 48510.1016/j.msea.2018.07.075 ↗
11. Jin · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2020 · 833
12. Xiao · Scr. Mater. · 2020 · 177 · 6910.1016/j.scriptamat.2019.10.012 ↗
13. Yang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2020 · 777
14. Huang · Mater. Des. · 2016 · 111 · 54810.1016/j.matdes.2016.09.012 ↗
15. Robson · Acta Mater. · 2009 · 57 · 273910.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.032 ↗
16. Huang · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2018 · 92 · 28410.1016/j.pmatsci.2017.10.004 ↗
17. Mohri · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2000 · 290 · 13910.1016/S0921-5093(00)00959-X ↗
18. Lutterotti · Acta Mater. · 1998 · 46 · 10110.1016/S1359-6454(97)00222-X ↗
19. Sun · Acta Mater. · 2018 · 151 · 26010.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.003 ↗
20. Chen · Acta Mater. · 2016 · 109 · 20210.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.050 ↗
21. Underwood · 1970
22. Chen · J. Magn. Alloy. · 2015 · 3 · 19710.1016/j.jma.2015.08.003 ↗
23. Huang · Phys. B Condens. Matter · 2012 · 407 · 107510.1016/j.physb.2011.12.132 ↗
24. Qiu · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2014 · 586 · 3910.1016/j.jallcom.2013.10.042 ↗
25. Stanford · Acta Mater. · 2014 · 78 · 110.1016/j.actamat.2014.06.023 ↗
26. Humphreys · 2004 · 219
27. Zha · Acta Mater. · 2015 · 84 · 4210.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.025 ↗
28. Jin · J. Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2019 · 35 · 201710.1016/j.jmst.2019.05.017 ↗
29. Zha · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2017 · 728 · 87210.1016/j.jallcom.2017.09.017 ↗
30. Wen · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 276910.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.036 ↗
31. Tolouie · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2018 · 738 · 8110.1016/j.msea.2018.09.086 ↗
32. Ren · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2017 · 690 · 19510.1016/j.msea.2017.02.102 ↗
33. Zha · Scr. Mater. · 2018 · 155 · 12410.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.06.029 ↗
34. Zha · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2014 · 605 · 13110.1016/j.jallcom.2014.03.126 ↗
35. Humphreys · 2004 · 109
36. Humphreys · 2004 · 302
37. Ma · Acta Mater. · 2019 · 172 · 18510.1016/j.actamat.2019.04.046 ↗
38. Xu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2012 · 547 · 9310.1016/j.msea.2012.03.087 ↗
39. Wang · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2019 · 748 · 10010.1016/j.msea.2019.01.080 ↗
40. Yu · Acta Mater. · 2017 · 128 · 31310.1016/j.actamat.2017.02.044 ↗
41. Nie · Scr. Mater. · 2003 · 48 · 100910.1016/S1359-6462(02)00497-9 ↗
42. Kim · Scr. Mater. · 2009 · 61 · 104010.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.08.020 ↗
43. Jiang · Mater. Des. · 2016 · 108 · 39110.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.116 ↗
44. Cáceres · Philos. Mag. · 2008 · 88 · 97710.1080/14786430801968611 ↗
45. Liu · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 189 · 12910.1016/j.actamat.2020.03.001 ↗
46. Wu · Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. · 2015 · 112 · 1450110.1073/pnas.1517193112 ↗
47. Lin · Acta Mater. · 2020 · 193 · 12510.1016/j.actamat.2020.04.027 ↗
48. Jiang · J. Mater. Process. Technol. · 2010 · 210 · 75110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.12.013 ↗
49. Khani · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2016 · 678 · 4410.1016/j.msea.2016.09.066 ↗
50. Chen · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2008 · 483-484 · 11310.1016/j.msea.2006.10.199 ↗
51. Zha · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2017 · 728 · 68210.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.289 ↗
52. Guo · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2017 · 695 · 39610.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.222 ↗
53. Wang · Mater. Des. · 2016 · 89 · 16710.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.107 ↗
54. Nie · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2015 · 624 · 15710.1016/j.msea.2014.11.076 ↗
55. Pérez-Prado · Mater. Lett. · 2005 · 59 · 329910.1016/j.matlet.2005.04.061 ↗
56. Kim · Scr. Mater. · 2012 · 67 · 68910.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.07.002 ↗
57. Kim · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2016 · 677 · 33210.1016/j.msea.2016.09.063 ↗
58. Kim · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2008 · 460 · 28910.1016/j.jallcom.2007.06.050 ↗